As a long-standing member of the SAS (Starling Appreciation Society) I've read these threads with interest as those who take to starlings seem quite ready to say why, but those against don't seem to be precise as to what it is that they don't like about them. For me, as some of the posts say, they are an absolute delight to have in the garden, arriving, as they do, suddenly in flocks of 15-40, staying for around 10-15 minutes and then leaving as quickly as they came. Why do I like them? - well as the 'for' posts say, they are so cheerfully comic, whether feeding, bathing, or sitting in the trees going through their amazing repertoire of clicks, whistles, and imitations. They say that laughter is good for you, and I just can't help having a broad smile on my face for the time they are there; whereas much as like all the other avian vistors they don't make me laugh like starlings do. And mostly they seem to get on well with the other garden birds, particularly the sparrows who often seem to wait for their arrival and then follow them on to the feeders.
I do think some of the points made about their decline in some areas are good ones. I've also seen them in large numbers at Marshside, and the wet pasture there is very much a disappearing feature from our countryside.
Could some of the 'anti's' say what it is they don't like about them in the garden?
Alan Hill