Under exposed for unknown reason (1 Viewer)

Thank you VERY much Fugl. I just read the description. This is a lot smaller than a Cooper's Hawk, almost Pigeon sized. It had white spots on the back and no eyebrow line, so I was uncertain. Now, if I remember, the red eyes weren't mentioned in the description of the Merlin. I have zero experience with any of this, just watching my feeders, but one thing at a time, that's how things get done. I don't know why I couldn't find the Sharp-shinned. It's a perfect example, isn't it?

jmepler said:

If this was shot in near darkness it is certainly not underexposed. As Roy pointed out, the whites are actually overexposed. Overall it looks pretty good for a shot in low light.

Mike

Click to expand...

Agree.

This is underexposed. Beavers are active at night. This shot was in darkness, it is dark for the required shutter speed. I could not see it in the finder at all, I had to trust the AF to lock it.