• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Tengchong, Yunnan, China ... Part 3 (1 Viewer)

Frogfish

Well-known member
Just back from a trip and a host of unknowns ! Hoping you can help me ID these new-to-me birds.

Sorry for the lo-res photos. Either heavy crops or taken very early/late and so very noisy.

Altitude : Around ca. 1,700 - 2,000m (5,600 - 6,600ft). Yunnan province near the border with Burma.

Last of the Unknowns from Days 1&2 at Tengchong. Next moving onto Gaoligongshan ;)

Note that #3 is from Gaoligongshan at around 1,650m.
Note #5 I am assuming is a Large Hawk-cuckoo as I heard them calling. However can you confirm ? I one other poor shot from the rear if required.

Thanks !
Kevin
 

Attachments

  • Unknown%20GGS%20A%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    Unknown%20GGS%20A%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 76
  • Unknown%20D%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    Unknown%20D%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    132.2 KB · Views: 62
  • Unknown%20GGS%20B%20-%20Gaoligongshan%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    Unknown%20GGS%20B%20-%20Gaoligongshan%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    142.8 KB · Views: 61
  • Unknown%20Raptor%20A%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    Unknown%20Raptor%20A%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    58.1 KB · Views: 66
  • Unknown%20E%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    Unknown%20E%20-%20Tengchong%2C%20Yunnan%20%231-L.jpg
    127.3 KB · Views: 66
Sorry Mark - I have 3 or 4 but all of the bird in the same backlit position with no other features shown. From a distance I had originally thought Grey Bushchat (F) but on over-exposing the shot I can see that my assumption may be mistaken.

Agree on #3.

Many thanks again !
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top