• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Yellow-rumped Warbler complex (1 Viewer)

I did not go back and read the comments on the AOU proposal re splitting yellow-rumped warblers: does this study address the doubts put forward by some of the committee members?

Niels
 
On the ID frontiers Siler/ABA deal this paper is described as "This isn't a taxonomic paper". Thank goodness.
 
from http://www.aou.org/committees/nacc/proposals/2010_A_votes_web.php
the need for more study in the contact between auduboni and nigrifrons, suggests that it's premature to split these
Given the information presented in this proposal, my vote will ultimately go to option 4: treating coronata, auduboni/nigrifrons, and goldmani as three species. But I think we need to stick with our rules and wait for formal publication of all relevant genetic data before making this change, as without those particular analyses it is much less clear where to draw the lines.
Await publication of work in progress

My take is that even if this paper does not explicitly mention taxonomic consequences, the data in the paper to a large extent covers the deficits of knowledge regarding what is going on in the auduboni/nigrifrons contact region. Those are clearly not two species.

A few of the comments seemed to think that there was a lack of knowledge about the last form (goldmani). This paper obviously do not address that.

Niels
 
Brelsford A., Toews D.P.L. & Irwin D.E., 2017. Admixture mapping in a hybrid zone reveals loci associated with avian feather coloration. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 284: 20171106, 1-9.

Abstract

Identifying the genetic bases for colour patterns has provided important insights into the control and expression of pigmentation and how these characteristics influence fitness. However, much more is known about the genetic bases for traits based on melanin pigments than for traits based on another major class of pigments, carotenoids. Here, we use natural admixture in a hybrid zone between Audubon's and myrtle warblers (Setophaga coronata auduboni/S. c. coronata) to identify genomic regions associated with both types of pigmentation. Warblers are known for rapid speciation and dramatic differences in plumage. For each of five plumage coloration traits, we found highly significant associations with multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome and these were clustered in discrete regions. Regions near significantly associated SNPs were enriched for genes associated with keratin filaments, fibrils that make up feathers. A carotenoid-based trait that differs between the taxa—throat colour—had more than a dozen genomic regions of association. One cluster of SNPs for this trait overlaps the Scavenger Receptor Class F Member 2 (SCARF2) gene. Other scavenger receptors are presumed to be expressed at target tissues and involved in the selective movement of carotenoids into the target cells, making SCARF2 a plausible new candidate for carotenoid processing. In addition, two melanin-based plumage traits—colours of the eye line and eye spot—show very strong associations with a single genomic region mapping to chromosome 20 in the zebra finch. These findings indicate that only a subset of the genomic regions differentiated between these two warblers are associated with the plumage differences between them and demonstrate the utility of reduced-representation genomic scans in hybrid zones.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top