Just interested to know why camera shake will be more of a problem with a 1.6 crop. Once a full frame is enlarged to 1.6x surely the subject blur will be the same?
I'm confused as to why all the magazines etc still refer to the reciprocal of focal length as a minimum shutter speed, surely that was based on full frame uncropped images? Seems to me we now need to add in the sensor crop factor plus any image editing crop too?
I'm also interested to know how the resolving power of lenses matches the pixel size. Presumably we get to a point where the number of pixels is so large that they are so small that they fall below the lens resolution. Is it worth having more and more pixels? What is the useful limit?
I'm confused as to why all the magazines etc still refer to the reciprocal of focal length as a minimum shutter speed, surely that was based on full frame uncropped images? Seems to me we now need to add in the sensor crop factor plus any image editing crop too?
I'm also interested to know how the resolving power of lenses matches the pixel size. Presumably we get to a point where the number of pixels is so large that they are so small that they fall below the lens resolution. Is it worth having more and more pixels? What is the useful limit?