• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Pocket super zoom for record shots (1 Viewer)

Neil Hagley

Well-known member
I have a DSLR with zoom lenses etc, so I know that will be better than anything in the pocket/bridge category. I am however a field birder and tend to travel light with my lovely Leica binoculars and that's it, but I would love to have a pocket camera to take record shots with (I'm thinking something of the size of Sony Cyber-shot HX80).

I'm looking for a genuine pocket super zoom camera that I could pull out and operate quickly to capture reasonable images of say a raptor overhead? Capable of 'burst frame'?

I guess what I'm looking for is a camera that could capture something like this (below) if that was 200 metres or so up.
 

Attachments

  • Honey.jpg
    Honey.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 198
129 views but no replies! Does that mean pocket superzooms are incapable of capturing birds in flight overhead?

I wouldnt say incapable but not easy and maybe folks have not tried it,i can get most cameras to come close to doing what i want but never tried a pocket camera for more than the odd static shot.

I would have thought a bridge camera could work but its not pocketable.
 
Others may be more optimistic, but IMHO you would be doing very well to get an image as clear and clean as your Honey-buzz example with any of the current bridge superzooms, and I doubt it would be possible routinely with any pocket zoom. Writing as someone who has tried and been disappointed. Currently using m4/3 which for me is a fair compromise between potential image quality and portability!
Brian
 
This photo of a kestrel in a distance of 100m (according to Google Maps) was taken with a Canon SX50. Not so easy to beat this superzoom bridge with a camera weighing less than 560g or cheaper than 150 Euro.
 

Attachments

  • SX50.jpg
    SX50.jpg
    207.4 KB · Views: 157
I guess I can't answer unless you clarify..."pocket superzoom" is a non-camera. Do you want a pocket cam, or a superzoom/bridge camera.|:p|

For bridge superzoom, I do just fine with an SX60 (1365mm equivalent), and you can check my gallery for results there, which include birds in flight. I've done it for birds out at 80m and at 130m.

For pocket cams, really I can only suggest the Sony RX100 series, especially the MK-III, MK-IV, and MK-V. But their zoom isn't very far (70mm equivalent). There are good consumer pocket cameras with better zoom (my Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS is 240mm equivalent), but I'm not going to claim it can do birds in flight at range easily if at all.

If you could find a consumer-grade, high-zoom pocket camera that let you have direct control over shutter speed you might improve your chances quite a bit for making one work for BiF.
 
Last edited:
Here's an article with an overview of some of the recent "consumer" long-zoom cameras, some pocketable and some not. It discusses the Sony mentioned by the OP.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/2016-roundup-consumer-long-zoom-compacts

The problem you run into is that any truly pocketable long-zoom camera has to use a small sensor to maximize the crop factor, which compromises image quality. So the trend now for "enthusiast" zooms is to use larger 1" sensors, but that means the zoom is not so super--at least not what is ideal for bird photography.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top