Many thanks HermitIbis
My problem is that I may not be able to replace the SX50 easily here . . . and I have a trip to Kenya coming in less than 3 weeks. So I need either a new primary camera with the SX 50 as a backup or a complete replacement.
I understand that the RX10iii is bigger and substantially more expensive, but the versatility to do great landscape pix, plus macros and have great image quality seems an attractive option, with the SX50 (which I still thoroughly enjoy) retained for the longer range stuff.
I found the reviews of the P900 and the RX10iii by Stephen Ingraham to be very useful as his focus on point and shoot nature photography is close to my own mix of interests.
Cheers
Mike
Here's a few more SX50 pix from the Spring.
Mike,
I have the Sony rx10M11 and it's a quality camera. Better results than from the SX50 or 60. The extra zoom of the Mark 111 version would cover 90% of your needs ( except the for the longer telephoto for birds). The 4k video mode is excellent too and would enable you take quality stills from the clips.
I wouldn't go the P900 route as it's AF is a bit iffy in low light and no raw. The Canon/Sony image stabilising is a bit better than Nikon.
Africa is a very special place it's always good to take the best camera that you can afford and a backup camera.
Have a good trip,
Neil.