Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Something distracted me , turned round and they disappeared so only this.
we have them but I would have said too much white/lighter parts to be scoter.
Could they possibly be Velvet Scoters with a few with the white wing patches exposed?
I'm far from convinced but I just dont get a Tuftie feel from them.
They look a little small compared to the Shelduck in the background. A tricky one but Ill go for Goldeneye I think the one furthest forward looks pretty good for a female
Agreed. Often a struggle to ID birds from really poor image (no offence capdegat) but download it and enlarge, and Brent subsequently looks the obvious conclusion.
Brent Geese, agreed. On the image supplied, middle two birds especially look good ( and not really like any other options). Apparent smaller size down to zoomed-in illusion.
i agree with scoters, especially as there is a very clear pale spot on at least one cheek and obvioustly the white wings, although i have to say the far right bird looks like a coot!
My first thought when I saw this picture was of Brent Geese - having waited and read a few other people's thoughts I think my mind is unchanged. Please put me down for another Brent vote :t:
Do Scoters hang out so close to the shore? I've never seen any scoters (yet), but my impression is that they keep over 50ft from the shoreline.
Personally, I don't see enough white for Brant, but I do believe behavior can further narrow down the ID.