Pinewood
New York correspondent
This thread started out by which Model is better. The problems some have had with the
loose rubber armor on the E II, easily tells me the SE is better. I think the view through the
SE is superb.
Hello ND Hunter,
I am going to write on my experiences with the 8x32 SE and the 8x30 EII.
Every binocular is a design compromise: optics, ergonomics and price are all considerations for the designer. The SE, as Henry Link may have written, is a $400 binocular with $250 eyepieces, or something similar. However,the trade off was between good resolution across almost the whole field, in the SE and a rather wide field of view in the EII. It would seem that the SE uses longer focal length objectives, which might help in reducing chromatic aberrations. The leatherette on the EII, as opposed to rubber like armouring is probably a cost cutting measure.
Some people find the SE to be too unfriendly and a few people find the EII's wider field to be unpleasant or disturbing. Some folks cannot afford the SE and others cannot abide the leatherette and compact size of the EII.
I found that both had a fault for wearers of spectacles, who keep the eyecups down: annoying reflections off the eyepiece from strong backlight or side lighting, especially in the winter. I might have kept my EII but I preferred the total package of the Zeiss FL 8x32, which among other things is probably more robust than the EII.
Needless to write, your needs and preferences differ from mine.
Happy bird watching,
Arthur Pinewood :egghead: