A few opinions on the Nikon E IIs and SEs. Have had a number go through my hands and have kept the 10x35 EII and 8x32 SE and 12x50 SE. The 8x30 EIIs have that wonderful field and the 10x35 EIIs seem somewhat special in overall resolution. But there is one significant difference between the EIIs and the SEs, and it isn't the optics. The SEs are simply more robust. The 8 EIIs are too stubby for my extra large hands, and the recessed covering more for cosmetics - certainly not for function. And they don't stay glued. Any binocular with uncovered metal lids and beauty rings will accentuate the shock when they bang into hard objects, which seem to be always present when using binoculars. For the ultra careful user, the EIIs will be just fine. But they won't take the banging around when compared to the SEs. I've managed to drop the EIIs and the SEs, and can speak from experience the EIIs can't take the punishment the SEs will absorb.
Why Nikon didn't cover the EIIs with rubber is one of those mysteries only they can explain. My Zeiss 8x32 FL is for wet conditions and my 8x32 SE for general use. The 10x35 EII is my "house" glass for use from the deck. I consider the NIkon EIIs to be really good glasses handicapped only by their exterior construction. John
I personally like the leatherette covering the EII's. I like the way it feels in my hands, I like the classic retro look of it and it makes them lighter than the SE's. I agree they might not take being dropped, as well as, the SE but I personally have never dropped any of my binoculars. I guess it depends on how rough you are with your binoculars. It is kind of like a fine firearm. You wouldn't want to drop it anyway. I like the exposed classic beauty of the EII's. I guess for me it comes down to the view also. I am willing to risk a little more damage if I drop the binocular for the big FOV and easy eye placement of the EII's versus the SE's. When going back to the SE's the FOV seems like a small tunnel compared to the EII's. Nikon warranties them for 25 years right. If you drop them and screw them up send them back to Nikon and for $10.00 they fix them. Heck, they are only $400.00 compared to $2000.00 plus for todays alphas. I still would worry less about an EII versus a Swarovision. There is a signifigant difference in the optics between the two. Nikon designed their optics differently for a different view. I personally prefer the view through the EII's. One is not better than the other it just depends on what type of view you prefer. To me the EII's seem more lifelike and real when I look through them. To me one of the best views I have ever seen. I am like you though. The EII's are my fair weather binocular and the Zeiss 8x32 FL's are my bad weather and all purpose binocular. Isn't it funny how we have both come down to two binoculars that we like and our choice is almost the same.