What says the Annual Report ... isn´t the Original?I have never seen the original of these names. ...
I meant I've never seen the annual report.What says the Annual Report ... isn´t the Original?
Thanks, Mark! :t:
Both are wrong.Rostratulidae - I've seen both these authorships cited, but can't find either:
Rostratulidae Mathews, 1911 - only Mathews I can find is dated 1921, not 1911; in the 1921 edition cites himself and Ridgway on p. 119, but without extra info.
Rostratulidae Ridgway, 1919 - more widely cited, but no mention in this Ridgway, 1919 other than a name (subfamily Rostratulinae) without description on p. 145. Did he publish other papers in that year?
Thanks!
Agree on Reichenbach.Excellent, thanks!
Do you also have any details for Pluvianidae, please? Again, seen two citations, MacGillivray, 1852 and Reichenbach, 1848 (but suspect the latter may be a mis-citation of Pluvialidae).
Now [here].
...comprises 119 titles including 512 volumes (70,933 pages) of open access biodiversity materials from Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (LKCNHM) and the NUS Libraries.