Well after some shifting around of my collection of binoculars I ended up with a better diversity of my collection.
An 8x32 EL SV
Trinovid 10x42
And the newest member the Ultravid HD 12x50
My main contenders for the 12x50 were the Meostar 12x50hd - good reviews, good price/performance ratio. I owned the 10x42hd and liked it.
Ultravid - few reviews, strong reputation for the line, high dollar, replaced by the HD+. I have a Trinovid and like it.
EL Sv - many good reviews, strong reputation EL SV line, high dollar, I have the 8x32 EL sv and like it.
Well I came across a NIB pair of the Ultravid HD for the price of a Meostar so I took the plunge.
I will start with a general first impression. Leica builds a sexy well built binocular. They feel great in your hands and are beautiful just to look at. Accessories include objective covers that aren't as well built as Swarovski provides. The rain guard is a basic construction rubber. I have an extra Swarovski rain guard that I will use. These are much better constructed in my opinion. The next strap is on par with Swarovski, with the edge going to Swarovski for the easier installation and adjustment features. Leica provides a basic nylon or cordura case, but again not the quality of a Swarovski. I would like to see Leica cut back on the shiny box and formed rubber packaging inside and improve their accessory package. Swarovski seems to provide a better package. This is a minor critique, that shouldn't sway a purchase decision.
These binoculars feel great in my hands and hand a well placed thumb ridge instead of the indents found on many other brands. They are noticeably heavier than a typical 42mm. I think i will try a harness system if they are going to get use on longer hikes. I do think I can hold them from my hand comfortably for short periods, which was a pleasant surprise. The eyecups have 4 click stop positions. The diopter adjustment is excellent and a smooth focus wheel. My initial feel is that they balance better when holding them a little further down the barrel, but when I did this the focus wheel reach wasn't as comfortable. This will need some further experimenting and may not matter if they are used more on a tripod.
Crystal clear image with minor pincushion distortion around the edge. The close focus was tested at the reported 10 ft. The FOV seems very good, I didn't have a tunnel vision feeling with the 300'. I checked out the night tonight under the full moon light and the 50mm objective really lets the light in.
I think these will really shine on a tripod and I can't wait to spend more time behind them.
I will spend more time looking through them in upcoming weeks and share more thoughts.
An 8x32 EL SV
Trinovid 10x42
And the newest member the Ultravid HD 12x50
My main contenders for the 12x50 were the Meostar 12x50hd - good reviews, good price/performance ratio. I owned the 10x42hd and liked it.
Ultravid - few reviews, strong reputation for the line, high dollar, replaced by the HD+. I have a Trinovid and like it.
EL Sv - many good reviews, strong reputation EL SV line, high dollar, I have the 8x32 EL sv and like it.
Well I came across a NIB pair of the Ultravid HD for the price of a Meostar so I took the plunge.
I will start with a general first impression. Leica builds a sexy well built binocular. They feel great in your hands and are beautiful just to look at. Accessories include objective covers that aren't as well built as Swarovski provides. The rain guard is a basic construction rubber. I have an extra Swarovski rain guard that I will use. These are much better constructed in my opinion. The next strap is on par with Swarovski, with the edge going to Swarovski for the easier installation and adjustment features. Leica provides a basic nylon or cordura case, but again not the quality of a Swarovski. I would like to see Leica cut back on the shiny box and formed rubber packaging inside and improve their accessory package. Swarovski seems to provide a better package. This is a minor critique, that shouldn't sway a purchase decision.
These binoculars feel great in my hands and hand a well placed thumb ridge instead of the indents found on many other brands. They are noticeably heavier than a typical 42mm. I think i will try a harness system if they are going to get use on longer hikes. I do think I can hold them from my hand comfortably for short periods, which was a pleasant surprise. The eyecups have 4 click stop positions. The diopter adjustment is excellent and a smooth focus wheel. My initial feel is that they balance better when holding them a little further down the barrel, but when I did this the focus wheel reach wasn't as comfortable. This will need some further experimenting and may not matter if they are used more on a tripod.
Crystal clear image with minor pincushion distortion around the edge. The close focus was tested at the reported 10 ft. The FOV seems very good, I didn't have a tunnel vision feeling with the 300'. I checked out the night tonight under the full moon light and the 50mm objective really lets the light in.
I think these will really shine on a tripod and I can't wait to spend more time behind them.
I will spend more time looking through them in upcoming weeks and share more thoughts.