Mitchelle
Well-known member
At this point, picking things up from the premise that what has been done has been done, and apparently no laws were broken, I would like Robert Moyle, Chris Filardi, Paul Sweet, and Tyrone Lavery to each explain what role they played in the decision, how the decision was made, and what is the expected potential resulting from the decision: the decision to kill the Moustashed Kingfisher.
It wouldn’t be a matter of questioning for judgmental purposes. Judgment has already been rendered: some condemn the decision, some support the decision. The questioning would be for the purpose of obtaining firsthand knowledge as to exactly why the decision was made.
Given an honest detailed explanation, whether liked or not, a figurative silent walkaway and polite closing of the door on them could then be appropriate.
It wouldn’t be a matter of questioning for judgmental purposes. Judgment has already been rendered: some condemn the decision, some support the decision. The questioning would be for the purpose of obtaining firsthand knowledge as to exactly why the decision was made.
Given an honest detailed explanation, whether liked or not, a figurative silent walkaway and polite closing of the door on them could then be appropriate.
