• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

gulls (1 Viewer)

Here are two more pics with the second bird from the post #1576.
BTW, we don't accept comments from drunken guys! 8-P
 

Attachments

  • PB236770m.jpg
    PB236770m.jpg
    182.4 KB · Views: 61
  • PB236772m.jpg
    PB236772m.jpg
    166.3 KB · Views: 66
how could i restrain myself since your bloddy pik shows a llala smithinnanicharmegentini? and now find out the geografukal mass center B :)B :)B :)B :)B :)B :)
 
Lou, I hope you had a light hangover and you're "full operational" again.
I'm trying to age this michahellis (pic taken on November 27th - more pics available, if needed). In my humble opinion, the options are 2cy or 3cy...
 

Attachments

  • PB277685m.jpg
    PB277685m.jpg
    110 KB · Views: 222
Last edited:
hi cristian,

it seems that you misinterpreted my linguistic larid quiz from last night. :gh:
for your micha there's only one option and that is 3rd cycle, 3cy in this case. no such large p10 mirrors, no adult like inner primaries with broad white edges in a 2nd cycle bird. 3rd and 4rth cycles are often more difficult to separate but this one has many immature plumage traits, so a 3cy.
more pics always welcomed, especially of the bunch of caspians that you promised - take your time to process them...:t:

cheers,
 
I was joking, Lou.
Here are some pics (2 and 3 - same bird; 4 and 5 - same bird). Is it the first one a 3cy Caspian?
 

Attachments

  • PB277663m.jpg
    PB277663m.jpg
    131.8 KB · Views: 222
  • PB277702m.jpg
    PB277702m.jpg
    111.8 KB · Views: 219
  • PB277709m.jpg
    PB277709m.jpg
    125.6 KB · Views: 202
  • PB277759m.jpg
    PB277759m.jpg
    173.7 KB · Views: 212
  • PB277760m.jpg
    PB277760m.jpg
    133.9 KB · Views: 207
Last edited:
yes, looks like a 3cy caspian - quite retarded in many respects, especially mirror developement, pale ventral tongues, black down to p3 and brown secondaries.

then a nice 2cy pontic (is that the same in 2 and 3, guess so, looks like it has a mirror only on left wing)

and a 3cy - cach with no mirrors???? mich??? probably mich with such a wing. caspian like appearance of rounded head, dark smusged bill and dark eye but a 3rd cycle with just a tiny ghosty mirror can be only a michahellis! also, ventral p10 tongue is curved not rectangular.

cheers
 
Last edited:
A few more pics.
 

Attachments

  • PB278038m.jpg
    PB278038m.jpg
    118.7 KB · Views: 220
  • PB277801m_f.jpg
    PB277801m_f.jpg
    111 KB · Views: 201
  • PB278063m.jpg
    PB278063m.jpg
    128.6 KB · Views: 216
  • PB278026m.jpg
    PB278026m.jpg
    120.2 KB · Views: 238
1 and 5 seem to be the same ad cach with bloody pale irises.#
2 both birds should be michahellis. 1st is similar to #1588.4-5: with such a small mirror = 3cy mich, second with narrow tail band, clean darker grey mantle and scaps, yellowish bill base = a 2cy
3 another ad cach, also pale eyed.

interesting
 
Last edited:
i knew kentbirders are perverse but drunkbirder really stretches things.
i'd never endulge on saving pics of yellow legged/caspian gulls and their nasty offspring on my computer! B :)
 
i knew kentbirders are perverse but drunkbirder really stretches things.
i'd never endulge on saving pics of yellow legged/caspian gulls and their nasty offspring on my computer! B :)

Once I was out of my cell, I went straight back out into the field and digiscoped this....

A YLG, I reckon.

Cheers,

Andy.
 

Attachments

  • 1st win YLG.JPG
    1st win YLG.JPG
    93.1 KB · Views: 63
  • 1st win YLGv2.JPG
    1st win YLGv2.JPG
    82 KB · Views: 71
  • 1st win YLGv3.JPG
    1st win YLGv3.JPG
    117.4 KB · Views: 56
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top