swarovision EL 10x32 or 10x42 (1 Viewer)

bh46118 · Jan 22, 2015

I usually only often reference and belove SOBs that I actually own.

I guess Swarovski is all mixed up, I could have sworn that they market the SV as their flagship model.:h?:

brocknroller said:
your beloved and often referenced SOB :smoke:
<B>

bh46118 · Jan 22, 2015

Better low light performance at dusk isn't something a lot of binocular aficionados fixate on ?

brocknroller said:
giving the EL better low light performance. I don't watch birds at night, so that doesn't matter to me. :smoke:
<B>

jan van daalen · Jan 22, 2015

Hermann said:
You're right, of course. But I don't really worry about that at all myself. Something like 3-3,5m is quite enough, as far as I'm concerned.

Hermann

Take a look at a butterfly (with a 10x) from a distance of 17.5 cm or 35 cm. It looks like it aint much but it's a world of difference.

Jan

pimpelmees · Feb 1, 2015

i have tested the x32 and x42 , and found that i had to turn the focussing a lot more in the x32 than the x42 , so for example; a bird that i was following was in focus at different distances without re focusing on the x42 , on the x32 i had to re focus a lot !!

swarovision EL 10x32 or 10x42 (1 Viewer)

More options

bh46118

Well-known member

bh46118

Well-known member

jan van daalen

Well-known member

pimpelmees

Well-known member

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread