• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Philippine species limits (1 Viewer)

relocatin...
Spiderhunters
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.152...urnalCode=tauk

Apparently reiterates the call for splitting off the 2 Philippine Little Spiderhunters

The Auk 128(4):777-788. 2011
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.11019

Diversification of an Endemic Southeast Asian Genus: Phylogenetic Relationships of the Spiderhunters (Nectariniidae: Arachnothera)

Robert G. Moyle,1,5 Sabrina S. Taylor,2 Carl H. Oliveros,1 Haw Chuan Lim,3 Cheryl L. Haines,3 Mustafa A. Rahman,4 and Frederick H. Sheldon3
 
Philippine scops owls

Miranda, H. C. Jr. et al., 2011. Phylogeny and taxonomic review of Philippine lowland scops owls (Strigiformes): parallel diversification of highland and lowland clades. Wilson J. Orn. 123 (3): 441-452.

Abstract: ... Based on molecular and morphological evidence, we recognize the following Otus megalotis subspecies as full species: Luzon Lowland Scops Owl (O. megalotis), Mindanao Lowland Scops Owl (O. everetti), and Visayan Lowland Scops Owl (O. nigrorum). We also propose reassigning the Giant Scops Owl (Mimizuku gurneyi) to the genus Otus for phyletic consistency.
 
Rafe M. Brown, Cameron D. Siler, Carl H. Oliveros, Jacob A. Esselstyn, Arvin C. Diesmos, Peter A. Hosner, Charles W. Linkem, Anthony J. Barley, Jamie R. Oaks, Marites B. Sanguila, Luke J. Welton, David C. Blackburn, Robert G. Moyle, A. Townsend Peterson, and Angel C. Alcala, 2013. Evolutionary Processes of Diversification in a Model Island Archipelago. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol. 44: 411 -435.

Abstract
 
Yes, there is a malware warning for the site link that should have the list, but the web people are on holiday :eek!:
Des
 
Owing to some spelling mistakes (thanks to Thomas Kuenzel for alerting us to some of them) and other issues, the file has been replaced with an updated version.
 
Hosner et al

Hosner, Sánchez-González, Peterson & Moyle (in press). Climate-driven diversification and Pleistocene refugia in Philippine birds: evidence from phylogeographic structure and paleo-environmental niche modeling. Evolution. [abstract] [supp info]
... Each focal taxon (Harpactes ardens, Ceyx melanurus, Pachycephala philippinensis, Pycnonotus urostictus, Irena cyanogastra, Dicaeum hypoleucum, Prionochilus olivaceus, Aethopyga pulcherrima) has traditionally been considered a single species (Dickinson et al. 1991; Kennedy et al. 2000; Gill and Donsker 2013); although under lineage-focused species recognition criteria, each could be considered a suite of allopatric replacement species (Peterson 2006; Moltesen et al. 2012; Andersen et al. 2013; Hosner et al. 2013a). ...
...
Using congruence between operational criteria from both genetic markers (strongly supported monophyly, strong genetic differentiation between geographically-circumscribed groups) and phenotypic characters (fixed, diagnosable differences in plumage/morphology; assessed from museum specimens), the eight focal species would instead be partitioned into 16: C. melanurus partitioned into Ceyx melanurus, C. samarensis, and C. mindanensis (Collar 2011; Andersen et al. 2013); I. cyanogastra partitioned into I. cyanogastra I. ellae, and I. melanochlamys (including hoogstraali; Moltesen et al. 2012); D. hypoleucum partitioned into D. hypoleucum (including mindanense), D. pontifex, and D. obscurum (including cagayanense); Aethopyga pulcherrima, partitioned into A. pulcherrima A. jeffreyi, and A. decorosa (Hosner et al. 2013a). Two species require further evaluation because evidence from molecular markers and phenotype do not agree. Pachycephala philippinensis is genetically highly structured, yet the only populations differing in fixed plumage characters are the two distinctive populations inhabiting Calayan and Camiguin Norte islands to the north of Luzon, making phenotypically similar populations from the Luzon and Mindanao PAICs paraphyletic. Similarly, Luzon and Mindanao PAIC populations of P. olivaceus are each distinctive and diagnosable in plumage, but we recovered birds from Samar as sister to the Luzon PAIC populations rather than to Mindanao populations. Harpactes ardens and P. urostictus each include strongly differentiated populations genetically, but differences in appearance are subtle; populations are not diagnosable by fixed plumage or morphological differences.
 
Last edited:
Richard Klim posted in Picidae thread...
Dryocopus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Philippe
Winkler, H., A. Gamauf, F. Nittinger & E. Haring, 2013. Relationships of Old World woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae) – new insights and taxonomic implications. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 116: 69-86.
Winkler et al...
Quote:
The island form hodgei from the Anadamans [sic] is usually considered as a species (Short 1982) which is confirmed here. As Fig. 2 shows, confusus from Luzon, and possibly some of the other island forms, deserve species status by the same token. We also claim species status to the isolated Chinese form khamensis of the black woodpecker which is well separated from the nominate martius form.
 
Yellow-bellied Whistler

Hosner, Sánchez-González, Peterson & Moyle (in press). Climate-driven diversification and Pleistocene refugia in Philippine birds: evidence from phylogeographic structure and paleo-environmental niche modeling. Evolution. [abstract] [supp info]
Hosner. Resolving the complex evolutionary history of a Philippine songbird with genome-wide markers. Evolution 2014. (p194)
Inferring historical relationships between lineages of organisms can be a major challenge, especially when different data sources conflict. In the yellow-bellied whistler (Pachycephala philippinensis), a polytypic bird species found in the Philippine archipelago, phylogenetic inference based on mitochondrial DNA resulted in puzzling relationships that contradicted subspecies boundaries (based on plumage variation) and prevailing biogeographic hypotheses. To infer population structure, topology, and population sizes in whistlers, we selected 40 individuals from 12 islands (including all ten mitochondrial clades and seven described subspecies) for genomic sequencing. We used a genotype by sequencing approach, which recovered 15,000 high coverage loci. Assessments of population structure suggest discordance between mitochondrial and genomic DNA. Individuals from central Mindanao Island share mtDNA with western Mindanao, but share their genomic DNA with Eastern Mindanao. The topology of the population genomic species tree is also discordant with the mitochondrial genealogy. The genomic species tree supports a colonization scenario shaped by Pleistocene aggregate island boundaries, whereas the mitochondrial tree supports a stepping-stone colonization model. Estimates of effective population size are strongly correlated with island size. Distinctive populations inhabiting small, peripheral islands are recently derived from large-island populations, suggesting rapid phenotypic change on small islands and stasis on large islands.
[With thanks to Nick Sly.]​
 
Last edited:
Aethopyga, Robsonius...

Peter A. Hosner, 2014. Geographic drivers of avian diversification in the Philippine archipelago. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas.

[PDF] (35,2 MB!)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 1 year ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top