• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

ID confirmation needed (Poland) (1 Viewer)

Can we go back to page four of this thread, and post 94?

The picture of the Tit, identified as Willow, seems odd to me. The bird appears on my screen to have a black nape extending round onto the lower rear cheeks, and also a really extensive black bib. A bit like a Sombre tit, which although it shouldn't be in Poland, isn't far off to the south.

Can someone look at the photo for me and tell me why I am seeing it so wrongly?

Was the bird calling, Namq?

Sean
 
Ghostly Vision said:
Was the bird calling, Namq?

Unfortunately not. As for Sombre Tit - it would be the first observation in Poland, so I rather think not :)

As for the Knot - I've just checked in my book and it's the size of a Redshank... I didn't think so. In Polish the names for Little Stints and a Knot are similar ('biegus malutki' and 'biegus rdzawy') which suggests that their size do not differ that much :)
 
namq said:
In Polish the names for Little Stints and a Knot are similar ('biegus malutki' and 'biegus rdzawy') which suggests that their size do not differ that much :)

But still, despite the polish names, they are respectively the smallest and the biggest of our common calidris species.
I think the bird in 3502 stretched its body unusually and that's why its figure resembles Ruff or some tringa waders, but otherwise it looks like a Knot.
 
Maybe this time I get everything right :)
Photos taken today.

1 (4291). Wood Sandpiper ?
2 (4307). Dunlin (foreground), Curlew Sandpiper (background) ?
3 (4358). Temminck's Stint ?
4 (4366). Little Stint ?
5 (4385). Red-necked Phalarope ?

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • _MG_4291.jpg
    _MG_4291.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 68
  • _MG_4307.jpg
    _MG_4307.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 75
  • _MG_4358.jpg
    _MG_4358.jpg
    104.8 KB · Views: 81
  • _MG_4366.jpg
    _MG_4366.jpg
    77 KB · Views: 75
  • _MG_4385.jpg
    _MG_4385.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 92
Photos taken yesterday. Northern Poland. Thanks in advance!

1 (5538): Larus fuscus ?
2 (5669): Larus cachinnans ?
3 (5717): Rock Pipit ?
4 (5740): Larus cachinnans ?
 

Attachments

  • _MG_5538.jpg
    _MG_5538.jpg
    192.2 KB · Views: 51
  • _MG_5669.jpg
    _MG_5669.jpg
    119 KB · Views: 57
  • _MG_5717.jpg
    _MG_5717.jpg
    125.4 KB · Views: 58
  • _MG_5740.jpg
    _MG_5740.jpg
    189.6 KB · Views: 58
hi namq,

1. baltic gull (l. fuscus fuscus)
2. herring gull
3. rock pipit but i'm not totally sure i can exclude meadow pipit, there are some strange MPs looking like RP... some with better knowledge on structure should confirm this. did you notice its leg colour in the field?
4. i think it is a herring gull either although it has a long bill and quite plain coloured scapulars. head looks almost like yellow-legged gull. greater coverts and tertials could fit caspian. but the head structure doesn't strike me as being caspian. i'm not sure on this. is it the same ind. like in photo nr. 2?? edit: hm, obviously not. possibly a male cachinnans, i must check further!
 
Last edited:
plumage looks actually ok for cachinnans! just that head + not really small looking eye, and, though not reliable to say but primary projection looks a bit short for cachi.
shouldn't caspian have some more scaps moulted by this time of the year?
 
There are some second generation scapulars, six that I can see from this side, but I can´t see any covert moult. Some are later, not that uncommon. But being from Poland, with such a jizz, hybrids do exist, so...

JanJ
 
JANJ said:
There are some second generation scapulars, six that I can see from this side, but I can´t see any covert moult. Some are later, not that uncommon. But being from Poland, with such a jizz, hybrids do exist, so...

JanJ

haha! i didn't want to throw that hated word in..;)
 
Some photos from my trip to southern Poland (Tatra mountains region).

1 (9055). Honey Buzzard ?
2 (9477). Lesser Spotted Eagle ?
3 (9648). Common Buzzard ?
4 (9893). Meadow Pipit ?
5 (9959). L. cachinnans ?
 

Attachments

  • _MG_9055.jpg
    _MG_9055.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 98
  • _MG_9477.jpg
    _MG_9477.jpg
    233.3 KB · Views: 95
  • _MG_9648.jpg
    _MG_9648.jpg
    162.8 KB · Views: 86
  • _MG_9893.jpg
    _MG_9893.jpg
    246.5 KB · Views: 82
  • _MG_9959.jpg
    _MG_9959.jpg
    130.4 KB · Views: 104
Some more:

1 (8860). Common Kestrel ?
2 (8870). Common Buzzard ?
3 (8901). Marsh Harrier f ?
4 (9500). Common Buzzards ?

Thanks in advance for all.
 

Attachments

  • _MG_8860.jpg
    _MG_8860.jpg
    222.2 KB · Views: 115
  • _MG_8870.jpg
    _MG_8870.jpg
    211 KB · Views: 88
  • _MG_8901.jpg
    _MG_8901.jpg
    313.6 KB · Views: 88
  • _MG_9500.jpg
    _MG_9500.jpg
    163.9 KB · Views: 74
I'd agree with all of your ID's, except the first one, which i think is also a Common Buzzard. And the Marsh Harrier is a juvenile, and the gulls could be a mix, but i'll leave that one for others.
 
Hi again!

Some photos taken today:

1 (1682). Little Grebe ?
2 (1759). Linnet ?
3 & 4 (1794 & 1795). Peregrine Falcon ?

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • _MG_1682.jpg
    _MG_1682.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 89
  • _MG_1759.jpg
    _MG_1759.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 95
  • _MG_1794.jpg
    _MG_1794.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 128
  • _MG_1795.jpg
    _MG_1795.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 122
1 and 2 above I'd have as Little Grebe and Linnet alright.

3 & 4 I wouldn't want to call on the basis of these quality shots but it looks plausibly Peregrine-like in 4.
 
3rd picture shows pale brown upperparts and off white with little buff colouring to the underparts; no patterning to it and a closed 'sjawl' The head shows a crown and nape being white,which means it cant be a Peregrine,
4th picture is probably the same bird and may look like a Peregrine (a bit much actually but if it is the same bird as 3, Ill keep my 'no' instead of a Peregrine)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top