Hi there 'Real Grosser',
Given that we can all be mistaken, including you, there is never really any need for triumphalism when it comes to bird identification, never mind such dismissive and arrogant comments directed towards some of those who have commented on here in good faith.
I have seen acknowledged experts make bad calls based on record shots and even in the field, but these people tend to realise that the mistake was made when more evidence comes to light, and learn from this as a result. Would you just dismiss them (and I'm talking about really big names here!) the same way that you did to those singled out earlier?
I have absolutely no problem with you, rather the manner in which you chose to express yourself. I would urge you, man to man, to read back over what you had said and ask how you would feel if such a post was aimed at you.
For the record, I will freely admit to having been unable to make a call on the harrier based solely on the initial video-grabs, mainly due to the relatively poor quality of these. Now that I have seen the video, I do feel that it may well have been a 2nd cal Montagu's Harrier, as you say (it certainly seems to be one), but still find myself unable to see the barred axilliaries (and I tried, as they would, if present, sort out the ID straight away!) and find the exact wing formula difficult to make out...perhaps this is due to my relative lack of experience with Monty's, some failing/ ineptitude on my part or maybe it just isn't possible to see these?
I have seen a few Montagu's in Spain, 2 here, 2 juvs in Bulgaria and 1 in Morocco, loads and loads of Hen Harriers of all ages and a few Pallids in Bulgaria, though could do with seeing more of the smaller species.
Regards,
Harry
Given that we can all be mistaken, including you, there is never really any need for triumphalism when it comes to bird identification, never mind such dismissive and arrogant comments directed towards some of those who have commented on here in good faith.
I have seen acknowledged experts make bad calls based on record shots and even in the field, but these people tend to realise that the mistake was made when more evidence comes to light, and learn from this as a result. Would you just dismiss them (and I'm talking about really big names here!) the same way that you did to those singled out earlier?
I have absolutely no problem with you, rather the manner in which you chose to express yourself. I would urge you, man to man, to read back over what you had said and ask how you would feel if such a post was aimed at you.
For the record, I will freely admit to having been unable to make a call on the harrier based solely on the initial video-grabs, mainly due to the relatively poor quality of these. Now that I have seen the video, I do feel that it may well have been a 2nd cal Montagu's Harrier, as you say (it certainly seems to be one), but still find myself unable to see the barred axilliaries (and I tried, as they would, if present, sort out the ID straight away!) and find the exact wing formula difficult to make out...perhaps this is due to my relative lack of experience with Monty's, some failing/ ineptitude on my part or maybe it just isn't possible to see these?
I have seen a few Montagu's in Spain, 2 here, 2 juvs in Bulgaria and 1 in Morocco, loads and loads of Hen Harriers of all ages and a few Pallids in Bulgaria, though could do with seeing more of the smaller species.
Regards,
Harry