KenM
Well-known member
what's that ken? the bird in your pics is a common buzzard!
How do you explain the head Lou, it's the same shape in all the shots, protruding, pointed and small?
what's that ken? the bird in your pics is a common buzzard!
FIWW...the '' variable wing geometry'' of a passing Buteo video clip for consumption!
It has been suggested that the shots are ''noisey'', I have to agree, although this doesn't alter the perceived structure of the wings/tail, which are nonetheless subject to much ''aerial'' movement during flight mode.
The head shape however is IMO a much more reliable feature to consider, on the shots where the head is ''noisely'' seen, it can be no ''arte-factual'' coincidence, that it is of a shape that might best be described as always looking conical, or that which would fit neatly into an Isosceles triangle, quite the opposite of Buteo buteo, which fits neatly into a Bowler hat!
I would consider that head shape is indeed ''set in stone'' and demonstrably different when comparing the two candidates, supporting features being determined by flight variability and observer subjectivity, thus on balance I would suggest that the Buteo's candidature is weighed more towards HB than CB.
Cheers
https://youtu.be/hk8MmGh5MFs
If you go to this website:
http://www.goingbirding.co.uk/hants/photos.asp
and search for Honey Buzzard, you fill get a fair impression of what adults can look like. They never have dark bellies in combination with white breast bands, a pattern which is characteristic of adult common buzzards, as illustrated in your photos.
cheers, alan
I searched other photos of Buzzards being mobbed by other species and found photos with a similar long necked, small headed appearance, due to the bird's neck being stretched out to improve visibility of the mobbing birds as they approached. (There were Honey Buzzard photos came up in the search also, but these tended to be very obviously different).
I also found a few of my own photos where the lighting on the back of the head/neck meant that this particular area seemed to melt into the background (unless you zoomed close enough in to see the detail). This was compounded when the bird was further from the camera.
I've attached 3 other stills from your video, which don't show the particular features you've chosen to focus on. Based on these 3 what would you say it was?
I've attached 3 other stills from your video, which don't show the particular features you've chosen to focus on. Based on these 3 what would you say it was?
A very interesting response so far!
Presumably there may have been a ''different'' reaction, had this been the only image posted (as is often the case on this forum) for ID purposes, therefore I'll put the same question to you?
Cheers
Presumably there may have been a ''different'' reaction, had this been the only image posted (as is often the case on this forum) for ID purposes, therefore I'll put the same question to you?