Fedster,
I owned both the 30x and the 20x60x zoom for several years (I still have the 30x). I spent quite a bit of time trying to determine if the 30x had any optical advantage over the zoom set at 30x, besides the obviously wider field and longer eye relief. My eyepieces were bought about the same time, so they came with the same generation of Swarovski coatings.
Extensive side by side testing convinced me that the 30x was not perceptibly brighter than the 20-60x set at 30x. How could the 30x have been "much brighter"? Both eyepieces had the same coatings and the same number of lens elements. The 20-60x zoom is at a very slight disadvantage because its seven elements are in five groups rather than the 30x's four groups, but the two extra glass/air surfaces couldn't possibly reduce its light transmission by more than 1% compared to the 30x, probably less.
Henry
Well, I am reporting something I was told (please note that the colleague in question is an experienced birder -- he is in fact making a living out of it in a way -- hence why I take his opinion seriously). That's why I mentioned we are going to do side by side testing in poor light[1] to sort the issue out!
[1] poor light brightness is the only thing I care about -- for midday birding the 25-50 is perfectly fine.