Non-Swarovision EL 8.5x42 (1 Viewer)

P

Petrus82

Well-known member

• Jun 19, 2014

• #1

How good is the non-swarovision EL? Is there much of a difference between the two?

 

J

jan van daalen

Well-known member

• Jun 19, 2014

• #2

Petrus82 said:

How good is the non-swarovision EL? Is there much of a difference between the two?

Click to expand...

The EL has no fluorite (triple) objective lens. It has no field flatterer lens. Therefor it has no RB effect. It has a better balance. The FOV is a little bit smaller and the tubes of the SV are slimmer so it is more lightweight.
The SV has also a higher lighttransmission.

The EL is a hell of a bin IMO and the SV is the upgraded version with a lot of pro's and some cons.

Jan

 

E

edwincjones

Well-known member

• Jun 19, 2014

• #3

it is a money issue-for me

I am happy with my nonSV 8.5x42

I considered upgrading, but decided the degree of improvement
would not be worth the cost

as Jan said "it is one hell of a binocular"
but the SV may be a little bit better

edj

 

M

MPeoples

Well-known member

• Jun 19, 2014

• #4

You would be very happy with them, enjoy.

 

G

GeeJayW

Well-known member

• Jun 27, 2014

• #5

I was very impressed with the non-SV EL 8.5/42 that I used for a week up in the Scottish highlands. Am delighted with my SV ELs though I'm sure I would have been happy with the ELs too..