Hi All,
I'm "still" looking at purchasing my first spotting scope, main use hunting/nature observation plus occasional range use.
After looking thru a few threads I get the idea that anything over 40 mag. is a bit excessive unless real top quality gear. Also read a few comments that large objective will brighten up a view significantly given everything else is equal.
Scopes I'm considering vary from a 12-36x50 (Wedgetail -nice compact and reasonable quality) to 18-54x55 (Olivon -middle ground compromise) to 20-60x80 (Acuter pro series - bigger is better type thing).
Given I can always just use the 20-60x80 on say 40x and make use of the large objective I'm starting to think that may be my best option?
There is always the comment "buy the best you can afford" in this case the 12-36x50 may give me a better view at x36 but is hampered by a smaller objective lens?
So does size trump a potential small increase in quality?
Cheers,
Waldyo
I'm "still" looking at purchasing my first spotting scope, main use hunting/nature observation plus occasional range use.
After looking thru a few threads I get the idea that anything over 40 mag. is a bit excessive unless real top quality gear. Also read a few comments that large objective will brighten up a view significantly given everything else is equal.
Scopes I'm considering vary from a 12-36x50 (Wedgetail -nice compact and reasonable quality) to 18-54x55 (Olivon -middle ground compromise) to 20-60x80 (Acuter pro series - bigger is better type thing).
Given I can always just use the 20-60x80 on say 40x and make use of the large objective I'm starting to think that may be my best option?
There is always the comment "buy the best you can afford" in this case the 12-36x50 may give me a better view at x36 but is hampered by a smaller objective lens?
So does size trump a potential small increase in quality?
Cheers,
Waldyo