My 40D had finally given up the ghost. Even though it's three years old, it has only had 19,100 shutter actuations and has been well looked after, and it's supposed to be good for 100,000 actuations. I find this rather unsatisfactory in a £1,000 camera.
Anyway, I'm now faced with the dilemma of just getting the 40D repaired or buying a 7D as an upgrade.
The trouble is that, while there are many online glowing reviews of the 7D, there are also a number of more, shall I say, "equivocal" verdicts which suggest it is not the be all and end all.
So, should I take the plunge and buy a 7D or should I just do without a camera until I can get the 40D repaired?
I'm interested in seeing the opinions of those who have had one/both of these cameras.
Thanks in advance,
Malcolm
Anyway, I'm now faced with the dilemma of just getting the 40D repaired or buying a 7D as an upgrade.
The trouble is that, while there are many online glowing reviews of the 7D, there are also a number of more, shall I say, "equivocal" verdicts which suggest it is not the be all and end all.
So, should I take the plunge and buy a 7D or should I just do without a camera until I can get the 40D repaired?
I'm interested in seeing the opinions of those who have had one/both of these cameras.
Thanks in advance,
Malcolm