• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Caprimulgiformes (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------
Braun & Huddleston 2009. A Molecular Phylogenetic Survey of Caprimulgiform Nightbirds Illustrates the Utility of Non-coding Sequences. Mol Phyl Evol: in press.

Abstract: The order Caprimulgiformes comprises five bird families adapted to nocturnal activity. The order has been regarded as monophyletic, but recent evidence suggests that swifts and hummingbirds (Apodiformes) belong within it. To explore the group’s phylogeny, we obtained more than 2000 bp of DNA sequence from the cytochrome b and c-myc genes for 35 taxa, representing all major lineages and outgroups. Non-coding sequences of the c-myc gene were unsaturated, readily alignable and contained numerous informative insertions and deletions (indels), signalling broad utility for higher level phylogenetics. A 12 bp insertion in c-myc links Apodiformes with owlet-nightjars, confirming paraphyly of the traditional Caprimulgiformes. However, even this rare genomic change is homoplasious when all birds are considered. Monophyly of each of the five traditional families was strongly confirmed, but relationships among families were poorly resolved. The tree structure argues against family status for Eurostopodus and Batrachostomus, which should be retained in Caprimulgidae and Podargidae, respectively. The genus Caprimulgus and both subfamilies of Caprimulgidae appear to be polyphyletic. The phylogeny elucidates the evolution of adaptive traits such as nocturnality and hypothermia, but whether nocturnality evolved once or multiple times is an open question.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...serid=10&md5=8b9fc4a72ad65921a774705d83daec64

Richard
 
Last edited:
also:

Sigurdsson, S., American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA, [email protected] ;
Cracraft, J., American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA, [email protected]

RESOLVING THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AND TEMPORAL HISTORY OF THE CAPRIMULGIFORMES
Recent molecular work supports the monophyly of Caprimulgiformes (including an embedded Apodiformes) but basal relationships have remained difficult to resolve. We combined available molecular sequences and a new morphological data set in order to investigate basal relationships and to place a number of fossil taxa within the caprimulgiform tree, a goal being to estimate the temporal history of the group. Our results support the monophyly of Caprimulgiformes with an included “apodiform” clade, with some reservations regarding the inclusion of Steatornis. The relationships among the families outside the “apodiform” clade are not congruent across the different analyzes due to a fundamental difference in the molecular and morphological results regarding the relationship of the Caprimulgidae with Nyctibiidae and Podargidae. The inclusion of numerous fossil taxa in the morphological data set, and as constraints for molecular dating analyses adds important information regarding the temporal history, suggesting a Cretaceous origin of the Caprimulgiformes with the “apodiform” clade evolving in the early Palaeogene and the modern hummingbirds (Trochilidae) in the Eocene.

AOU meeting 12-15 august 2009 Philadelphia
Abstract (5552)
 
I have now read (most of) the paper by Braun & Huddleston, and there is an exaggeration in their abstract: according to my dictionary, elucidate means "explain", or "make clear", but in the text of the paper, they write it is not clear if the trait of nocturnality developed once or twice; once if all details including lowly supported nodes are correct, but twice if it actually turns out the Owlet-nightjars is a sister to Apodiformes.

One logical consequence of the two abstracts would be to embed Apodiformes within Caprimulgiformes, but Braun & Huddleston mentions two other possibilities: (1) Transfer Owlet-nightjars to Apodiformes, or (2) Make a new supraordinal taxon that contains Apodiformes and Aegothelidae. Which of the total of three options would be preferable and why? I think my personal preference would be to have 2-several orders that better reflected the biology of the included species, but I assume the argument for the enlarged Caprimulgiformes would be to better display the evolutionary history?

Thanks
Niels
 
Last edited:
Sigurdsson, 2013. The systematics and evolution of the nightjars and their allies (Aves: Caprimulgiformes). Dissertation.

Abstract

TiF Update October 16:

I made some adjustments to the Nightjars and Nighthawks based on Sigurdsson (2013). He confirmed that the Setopagis did not form a clade (also suggested by Han et al., 2010). As a result, Setopagis, Eleothreptus, Systellura, and Macropsalis have been submerged into Hydropsalis. Further, three species have been split from the Band-winged Nightjar, Hydropsalis longirostris. They include Tschudi's Nightjar, Hydropsalis decussata, and Tepui Nightjar, Hydropsalis roraimae, both also advocated by Cleere (2010), and Rufous-naped Nightjar, Hydropsalis ruficervix. Sigurdsson (2013) has identified several other taxa that seem to be phylogenetic species (including subspecies of the Lesser Nighthawk and Pauraque). I'm not yet convinced they are biological species and have not included them here.
 
Could someone with access please elaborate (eg, the scope of the suggested PSC species within Lesser Nighthawk and Pauraque)

In Lesser Nighthawk, they recommend elevating the northern subspecies texensis to species, on the basis of it's the most genetically divergent subspecies of C. acutipennis and:
Individuals of C. a. texensis are noticeably larger in size and have a lighter plumage than most other subspecies of C. acutipennis
The range split is roughly in central Mexico, with texensis to the north and the rest of acutipennis to the south in Central and South America. That's about the extent of the evidence given, in my personal opinion it's a pretty weak split.

Pauraque is split into three phylogenetic species groups, split roughly into N. merrilli in Central America, N. albicollis in northern South America and southern Central America (potentially overlapping with merrilli), and N. derbyanus in southern South America. Here is the summary of morphology given:

The external morphology of the Pauraque has been studied extensively (Hartert, 1892; Griscom 1929; Grant, 1965). Hartert (1892) suggested that there is clinal variation in plumage morphology, with individuals in the wet tropics being darker and smaller in size than individuals in more arid regions. However, morphological variability also falls along subspecies-lines and the three phylo-species proposed in this study differ in morphology from one another. N. albicollis is the smallest of the three phylo-species. It is overall the darkest with a soot-grey head but also has distinct brown markings on its back and coverts. N. derbyanus is the largest of the three phylo-species and most conspicuously reddish-brown in color with the crown, back and coverts rustic-brown. Nyctidromus merrilli is intermediate in size and the plumage is both lighter and greyer than in the other two phylo-species, with a slate-gray coloration on the crown and back being particularly noticeable. There are also conspicuous black patterns on the coverts of merrilli, which in both albicollis and derbyanus tend to be browner. Some individuals in arid areas of Mexico are slightly more reddish in color, but overall the three named forms within N. merrilli (insularis, merrilli and yucatanensis) are similar to one another. The only subspecies of the ‘old’ Nyctidromus albicollis that was not sampled, N. a. gilvus, is similar in size to the nominate form but considerably lighter in color. Genetic data are needed to address its taxonomic status.
 
Sigurdsson, 2013. The systematics and evolution of the nightjars and their allies (Aves: Caprimulgiformes). Dissertation.

Abstract

Sigurðsson, S. and Cracraft, J. (2014), Deciphering the diversity and history of New World nightjars (Aves: Caprimulgidae) using molecular phylogenetics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170: 506–545. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12109

[Abstract]
 
Sigurðsson & Cracraft 2014

Sigurðsson, S. and Cracraft, J. (2014), Deciphering the diversity and history of New World nightjars (Aves: Caprimulgidae) using molecular phylogenetics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170: 506–545. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12109 [Abstract]
South American aspects: AOU-SACC...
1. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014), with extensive taxon-sampling, found that the family consists of seven major clades, three of which occur in South America: a "poorwill" clade (which includes Antrostomus and Nyctiphrynus), a "nighthawk" clade, and a "South American" clade (all other genera). SACC proposal needed for new linear sequence.

3a. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) treated the subspecies latifascia of extreme s. Venezuela as a separate species from N. leucopyga. SACC proposal badly needed.

3e. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) confirmed the sister relationship of nacunda and pusillus, but redefined Podager to include C. pusillus. Proposal needed.

4b. [Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) treated Nyctidromus albicollis as consisting of three phylogenetic species.]

9a. ... [Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) elevated ruficervix and the subspecies roraimae to species rank based on PSC rationale.] ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) showed that decussatus (of coastal Peru and Chile) is only distantly related to S. longirostris despite morphological similarities. SACC proposal badly needed.

9b. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) expanded Hydropsalis to include Systellura and Eleothreptus. SACC proposal badly needed.

9c. [Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) treated the subspecies albicauda (with apertus and insularis) as a separate species from H. cayennensis based on PSC rationale.]

10. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) expanded Hydropsalis to include Eleothreptus and Uropsalis. SACC proposal badly needed.

12a. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) expanded Hydropsalis to include the species here included in Setopagis. SACC proposal badly needed.

14. ... Sigurdsson & Cracraft (2014) found that nigrescens and hirundinaceus are sister species and that they are sister to Nyctidromus as currently defined; they included nigrescens and hirundinaceus in Nyctidromus. SACC proposal badly needed.
 
Last edited:
White, Faircloth & Braun. The use of ultra-conserved elements in resolving nightbird (caprimulgiformes) phylogeny. Evolution 2014. (p293–294)
A surprising finding of recent avian phylogenetics is the statistically unambiguous grouping of the diurnal order Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds) within the nocturnal order Caprimulgiformes (i.e. nighthawks and nightjars; hereafter called "Caprimulgiformes"). The pairing of the two orders in monophyly raises questions about the evolution of nocturnality in birds, especially how many times it occurred, what adaptations made it possible, and what genetic and molecular variation underlies those adaptations.

Previously mentioned phylogenies reconstructed this clade with modest datasets. I have used a novel massively parallel sequencing approach to resolve the "Caprimulgiformes" phylogeny using a dataset based on the informative flanking regions of ~5,000 ultra-conserved element (UCE) loci. I will present analyses that seek to extract the most phylogenetic information from this dataset using currently available techniques, including efforts to assign UCE loci to functional categories.
[With thanks to Nick Sly.]​
 
Last edited:
"A surprising finding of recent avian phylogenetics is the statistically unambiguous grouping of the diurnal order Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds) within the nocturnal order Caprimulgiformes (i.e. nighthawks and nightjars; hereafter called "Caprimulgiformes")."

I obviously missed this first time around - Is this the Eared Nightjars from the "typical Nightjars" or is it more complex? Any accessible refs welcome.

cheers, alan
 
"A surprising finding of recent avian phylogenetics is the statistically unambiguous grouping of the diurnal order Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds) within the nocturnal order Caprimulgiformes (i.e. nighthawks and nightjars; hereafter called "Caprimulgiformes")."
I obviously missed this first time around - Is this the Eared Nightjars from the "typical Nightjars" or is it more complex?
eg, Cracraft 2013 (H&M4) includes superfamily Trochiloidea (Aegothelidae, Apodidae, Trochilidae) within Caprimulgiformes.
 
The source of confusion, I think, is the phrase "within the nocturnal order Caprimulgiformes (i.e. nighthawks and nightjars;": this suggests they are using Caprimulgiformes in the restricted sense (nighthawks and nightjars only, no frogmouths, potoos, oilbirds, etc.). They presumably meant "nighthawks, nightjars, and allies", ie., a broad Caprimulgiformes.
 
Band-tailed Nighthawk

Sigurðsson, S. and Cracraft, J. (2014), Deciphering the diversity and history of New World nightjars (Aves: Caprimulgidae) using molecular phylogenetics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170: 506–545. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12109 [Abstract]
Sigurðsson & Cracraft 2014. [pdf]

AOU-SACC Proposal #673 (Robbins, Jul 2015): Recognize Nyctiprogne leucopyga latifascia as a species.
Perhaps Cryptic Nighthawk might be an appropriate name given that it was genetic data that revealed the unrecognized species.
Cleere 1999 (HBW 5).

Cleere 2010 (Nightjars of the World)...
N. l. latifascia differs from other subspecies in having unmarked primaries and a more proximal white tail band, and may prove to be a full species.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top