idaviesbird
eBird Project Coordinator
Yes.
First, it's unacceptable imperialism, forcing people outside the USA to use USA spellings that they detest.
Second, a lot of users won't be familiar with the Americanisms, and will be unable to enter their data.
Solution: ebird must accept that Old World species should be corrected in their database to have Old World English spellings (grey, coloured, etc.). I have no objection to e.g. Gray Catbird, but I do have strong objections to being told that I'm too thick and stupid to be able to spell Grey Heron correctly. It isn't yours to dictate what it is called.
Hi Nutcracker, everyone,
Thanks for the comments—we always appreciate feedback.
As others have mentioned, we do actually support the UK spelling of bird names. We have 28 different languages supported as well as 23 regional variations (e.g,. UK English, Australian English, South African English), and you can even view the species using IOC names. Full list here: http://help.ebird.org/customer/portal/articles/1596582-common-name-translations-in-ebird
The default list of bird names displayed follows the Clements taxonomy, which does indeed spell all instances of Gray with an a. However, with a few clicks you can change those to Es for every single output in eBird to fit your preferences. This includes all data outputs, all data entry (including mobile app), and whatever else may be of interest!
As others have said, we do hope that this won't stand in the way of giving Global Big Day a try.
Best,
Ian
--
Ian Davies
eBird Project Coordinator
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
http://ebird.org/ebird/profile/MTI3NDA0