• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Alula birding magazine publishing has ended (1 Viewer)

Kevin Purcell

Well-known member
Alula birding magazine publishing has ended: the end of Finnish optics reviews?

This was mentioned by Kimmo down a thread I started but it seems like it should get "top billing"

Alula birding magazine publishing has ended
http://alula.fi/gb/

Alula birding magazine publishing has ended

Alula board has decided in the meeting held beginning of December 2008 to stop to publish Alula birding magazine. The last published number is 3/2008. The main reason is that the current amount of subscribers does not cover all the costs to publish four issues of Alula birding magazine.

The efforts made to improve the magazine quality and content did not increase the amount of subscribers. There are several reasons behind. One part of the old subscribers, mainly abroad, has built subscriber groups which are then sharing one magazine among the group members. Much bigger impact has internet where people can find free of charge good numbers of high quality photos with photo captions. The impact of internet will dramatically increase in the coming years.

Alula board had already in the summer 2008 made a decision to raise our subscription rates for the year 2009. However, we realized that most probably it does not help in the current financial situation. Alula has received substantial support from our advertisers which we warmly want thank for. With the help of advertisers we have managed to keep our prices in a very reasonable level. The amount of advertisements could not be increased comparing to the size of the magazine. Thus the only income increase would have been to raise substantially subscription fee.

Alula birding magazine has published in the past years a good number of high quality articles but to keep such quality level requires lots of effort. We want to thank all writers who have helped us to keep Alula birding magazine high standards.

Alula staff and supporters have other full time jobs. With current publishing fee level it has been hard to keep all motivated. The need to increase publishing fees has been evident but Alula has not been able to pay more. We want to thank all Alula staff members and supporters who have made possible to publish the high quality Alula birding magazine until now.

We have received in the past years lots of good feedback for the magazine high quality articles. The decision made two years ago to focus on Alula’s content has been towards correct direction. Alula birding magazine has been important channel for Finnish birdwatchers to publish articles in an international forum.

We are very sorry for Alula subscribers for the decision to stop Alula publishing unexpectedly. We want to thank you for your interest towards Alula birding magazine in the past years.

Thanking for your cooperation,
Alula owners

I thought this bit perhaps the most interesting:

The efforts made to improve the magazine quality and content did not increase the amount of subscribers. There are several reasons behind. One part of the old subscribers, mainly abroad, has built subscriber groups which are then sharing one magazine among the group members. Much bigger impact has internet where people can find free of charge good numbers of high quality photos with photo captions. The impact of internet will dramatically increase in the coming years.

Those sharing foreigners ;)

Most of the content is locked up in paper. There is relatively little on the web site though what is there (especially the reviews) is very, very good. But the web is where most of the optical nutcases are (you're reading this here right ;) ). Isn't that the eyeballs that advertisers want? But they have no advertising on the web site?

Being a specialized paper magazine for the past decade or so is a very odd decision to avoid making a "free" website pay. They should have moved completely to the web (where do most subscribers live?) and perhaps tried another business model. There are plenty of people publishing the bin reviews but few doing as good a job of it as Alula.

I see this a lot in birding magazines hiding their reviews in print and not even giving people the option to subscribe for website access. I just find it odd compared to other magazines and journals I read. Sharing the wealth brings you reputation. And reputation should be convertible into revenue with a decent advertising model.

I guess I'm a product (though I'm 47) of the Internet era even though I started early thinking in 1987 when walking down a corridor that I could sort out a billing problem with an electricity company a lot more easily if I could send them email with all the details.

Still it can be difficult to balance the free and the revenue generating copy but pretty much all the magazines I know (outside academic ones) make the majority of their money from advertising and not from subscriptions or sales.

Perhaps there's a chance for them to release the copyright on their back copies and put scanned versions on the web? It all a sunk cost.

They're selling off back copies for half a Euro each plus shipping.

RIP, Alula. You will be missed.

PS Download the reviews from the site now. One wonders how much longer it will be there.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Kevin, I´ll miss Alula. I´d only started subscribing last year and loved the old-world prospect of getting a quarterly print magazine in the post. Even if I´d no idea what most of the birding articles were about. Beautiful photos and artwork. And great fun trying to read the optics ads in Finnish!;)
 
I have yet to make a birding trip to my native Finland, but there is plenty of info here, some in Finnish. Tiira (tern) still published.
http://www.birdlife.fi/
I may join once I have been there. Quarterly birding magazine
http://www.birdlife.fi/julkaisut/tiira/index.shtml
or two
http://www.birdlife.fi/julkaisut/linnut/index.shtml

No great emphasis on optics in those.

here is their annual back yard birding event
http://www.pihabongaus.fi/

The 10 common birds last January included the usual blue tits, magpies, crows etc
laji % pihoista yksilöä/piha
1. talitiainen 96 9
2. sinitiainen 82 5
3. harakka 68 3
4. viherpeippo 51 12 ....tree sparrow
5. käpytikka 41 1 ..woodpecker
6. keltasirkku 41 18
7. hömötiainen 37 3
8. varis 35 4 ...crow
9. varpunen 33 9 ...sparrow
10. närhi 27 2 ...jay
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't this be in the the books and magazines section, or even birds and birding?? I thought Alula was a general birding publication . . .

And isn't there someone out there willing to do a takeover deal? . . ;) Sad news at any rate . .
 
As a subscriber, very sorry to hear this. There's been some good stuff in this mag over the years, not least the optics reviews.

Sean
 
I have yet to make a birding trip to my native Finland

Well, Tero you'll have to catch up on that.
I was there in August, mainly in Lapland (Sapmi). The weather could have been better but at least I missed the worst of the mosquito plague.
Highlights for me were the Siberian Jay and the Bluethroat. The former is called Unglückshäher (unlucky Jay) in German, heaven knows why. The Finns regard it as a lucky bird.
The Liminka bird sanctuary near Oulu on the gulf of Bothnia is also a must - among others, Caspian Tern, White-tailed Eagle and dozens of Marsh Harriers.
I shall also be sorry to see Alula go but agree with Sancho that it was often a bit too academic i.e. 8 pages on "The mixed song of Chiffchaffs in Northern Russia" in the last issue.

John
 
Shouldn't this be in the the books and magazines section, or even birds and birding?? I thought Alula was a general birding publication . . .

I put it here because it provides some of the best birding optics reviews that I've read and that's what the binocular forum is interested in too.

As some of the reviews are on the web site a chance to download them before they go away might not go amiss either.

The other birding articles are apparently filler. ;)

But perhaps that makes a good point: what were people subscribing for? I would think the reviews and optics reviews could stand alone.
 
Last edited:
I put it here because it provides some of the best birding optics reviews that I've read and that's what the binocular forum is interested in too.

As some of the reviews are on the web site a chance to download them before they go away might not go amiss either.

The other birding articles are apparently filler.

But perhaps that makes a good point: what were people subscribing for? I would think the reviews and optics reviews could stand alone.

Ah, that would explain why most of the references to it I have heard in recent times were within these sub-forums :t: Trying to be helpful, I had thought was a general birding publication. But was beginning to realise that may have been my 2nd 'stoopid' post of the day after posting lol. . .

Internet- how long before it completely takes over from printed publishing??
 
the website seems to have disappeared. Understandable I suppose but one hopes the optics reviews will be made available somewhere soon.

Sean
 
The optics reviews will become available on the net again in the future. I'm still going to discuss some options, so it will take some time before the English-language versions are accessible. Most of the Finnish-language reviews have recently been re-posted on the website of Birdlife Finland's book and birding equipment store, www.lintuvaruste.fi under "optiikka-arvosteluja"

Kimmo
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top