Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Magnifying the passion for nature. Zeiss Victory Harpia 95. New!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 9th January 2018, 22:30   #26
Patudo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: London
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by denco@comcast.n View Post
One big advantage of the Canon is it has an AFOV of 65 degrees
Apparent field of view of the 10x42L is 59.2 degrees according to Canon themselves - see https://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/pro.../10x42l_is_wp/

I'm just wondering how many commentators in this thread, kabsetz apart, have had a good look through both instruments?

Last edited by Patudo : Tuesday 9th January 2018 at 22:32.
Patudo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 00:29   #27
henry link
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 4,039
Looks like Canon's AFOV spec is a calculation using the ISO method. Neither that method nor the 65 simple calculation takes distortion into account. Swaovski's spec appears to be an actual measurement of the "true" AFOV including distortion.

Without measuring it we can't know the "true" AFOV of the Canon, but since we know it has some pincushion distortion, it's reasonable to to assume a value somewhere close to the midpoint between 59.2 and 65.
henry link is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 10:46   #28
adhoc
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Anon.
Posts: 247
Canon IS 10x42 vs an "alpha" non-IS 12x (e.g. Swaro. EL 12x50): can anyone comment from experience? Thanks!
adhoc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 12:48   #29
wllmspd
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hampton
Posts: 77
Depends how still you reckon you can hold the 12x as the stabilisation allows you pick out really small details as the view isnt moving about.

Peter
wllmspd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 17:00   #30
adhoc
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Anon.
Posts: 247
Yes, I based the question on that concept--also aware that different non-IS 12x models, with differing weight and balance, will differ in stability in the hands of different users--but I am seeking reports of actual experience of "side-by-side" comparisons, in terms of seeing detail.
adhoc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 17:19   #31
doug el10x32
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 95
Hi Adhoc.

I think that you will find that if both are handheld, the Canon IS model will show far more detail. I didn't have a 12x Swarovski, but all of my Canon IS models run circles around my Swarovski 10x EL's and SLC's.

Doug.....

Last edited by doug el10x32 : Wednesday 10th January 2018 at 17:37.
doug el10x32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 10th January 2018, 20:37   #32
elkcub
Registered User
 
elkcub's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 4,097
I've tried the Canon 10x42L IS WP several times, but the 16mm eye relief always turned out to be a deal breaker. Those who use prescription eyeglasses owe it to themselves to evaluate this aspect before buying. Near sighted folks will probably be more comfortable than far sighted ones.

Ed
__________________
Understanding optics is child's play compared to understanding child's play.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts." Richard Feynman

Last edited by elkcub : Wednesday 10th January 2018 at 21:16.
elkcub is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Friday 12th January 2018, 21:43   #33
maico
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 244
As a Canon owner I'll throw in my 1 cents worth.

If you have a narrow IPD with a big nose or wear glasses when viewing try before you buy. Clearance can be tight.

The Canon performs optically slightly better with the IS off. If the IS were to fail it's not the end of the world.

Swarovski are sold by specialist dealers and it's hard to get a substantial discount. I tried and failed to buy a SLC 8x56 recently.
Canon on the other hand, is carried by places who sell washing machines and computers and here in England you can get great deals if you keep your eyes open !

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/CANON-Bin...72.m2749.l2649


I used to run an arbitrage business selling prestige German brands into the US in situations where the official US importers jacked the prices up to unrealistic levels.
maico is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swarovski slc 10x56 batvenci Swarovski 3 Friday 8th September 2017 13:10
nikon se, canon is or swarovski slc 10x42 Hati Binoculars 19 Thursday 17th August 2017 17:39
Eden XP 10x42 and 10x56 typo Others 3 Wednesday 23rd May 2012 19:50
Canon IS 12x36 v. Swarovski EL 10x42 Sancho Canon 36 Tuesday 21st October 2008 16:55

{googleads}
£100 Cashback on Opticron DBA VHD Binoculars. Click to find out more.

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.13898897 seconds with 19 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:29.