I'm planning on building my own
http://www.stefanavalos.com/microphones/smallcardioids/diymic01.htm
http://microphone-parts.com/
-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Astroscope + DSLR = Gallery! (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter cango
- Start date
I'm planning on building my own
http://www.stefanavalos.com/microphones/smallcardioids/diymic01.htm
http://microphone-parts.com/
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
I have a VIDPRO mike that I bought from B&H in the US. I hesitate to recommend it because it is the only one I have ever used but it works to my satisfaction and the price is right. It comes with all the needed accessories, cables and adapters.
There are all sorts on eBay and some are very cheap. I have been told by a knowledgeable person that an expensive mike is not needed for good results.
I haven't done much video but your post reactivated my interest. I may give it a go this week.
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
Make sure the following are included:
Audio cable and connector to your camera
Wind filter
Camera flash socket adapter (I modified my adapter so that I can use the flash socket on the camera or the finder scope socket on my scope)
Uses AA batteries
Cardioid or shotgun pattern. some look like directional but are not. Important to get rid of surrounding noises.
Good luck with your purchase
Jules
agree!
(7 months waiting for summer to come, and now all is too green, and birds hard to spot...)
Tord
Well-known member
Thanks Jules and Carlos. With summer having made good progress I agree it's getting a bit challenging by now to locate the birds in the foilage. So why not shoot what's in the sky?
TLAPO804 (480mm), 75% frames. Action was takaing place less than 20 meters from ground.
TLAPO804 (480mm), 75% frames. Action was takaing place less than 20 meters from ground.
Attachments
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
Also nice, particularly the second one.
Tord
Well-known member
The microphone I ordered was just delivered. Looking OK, however now I realize an adapter is needed (SEMA-1 I think), price tag is quite high. I suppose I will use the mike on the E-5 (has 3.5mm mike input).
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
Nice !
Tord
Well-known member
Thanks Jules,
I had quite high keeper rate that day, around 1/3, I guess I was lucky. Here are a few more, I think they are OK though they are ~50% crops. Shame the light on the last one is a bit harsh.
I had quite high keeper rate that day, around 1/3, I guess I was lucky. Here are a few more, I think they are OK though they are ~50% crops. Shame the light on the last one is a bit harsh.
Attachments
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
"Practice makes perfect" In my case, it is more like "Luck makes perfect" but my keeper rate is way low... I find it too big a lens to focus manually on BIF unless the bird is quite far and the flight pattern is predictable, like geese. Also, a focus button instead of a focus ring makes it even more difficult. Let's not forget that scopes are made to focus on stationary objects.
Regards
Jules
Last edited:
Tord
Well-known member
Jules,
Though the scope is primarily meant for static subjects, however since much of the action takes place in the air (at least where I live) there are opportunities not to be missed. Mounted on a gimbal head the operation is free from effort and provides good ergonomy, however the final result is a bit of luck since the difference between good and perfect focus is a matter of a slight twist on the focuser knob that can be hard to assess with 100% certainty.
I too find that Geese are easiest, flying in a predictable way and often flying low enough to get detailed pictures. Gulls are relatively easy too, provided the wind direction is right. Waders and ducks are more difficult, but the plumage can create beautiful effects. Terns are a challenge and require good preparations from the photographer.
Though the scope is primarily meant for static subjects, however since much of the action takes place in the air (at least where I live) there are opportunities not to be missed. Mounted on a gimbal head the operation is free from effort and provides good ergonomy, however the final result is a bit of luck since the difference between good and perfect focus is a matter of a slight twist on the focuser knob that can be hard to assess with 100% certainty.
I too find that Geese are easiest, flying in a predictable way and often flying low enough to get detailed pictures. Gulls are relatively easy too, provided the wind direction is right. Waders and ducks are more difficult, but the plumage can create beautiful effects. Terns are a challenge and require good preparations from the photographer.
JGobeil
Nature Photographer
Wow!
harrier
Got lucky here.
The harriers are - easier - as they fly low and return now and then. But though it was early and not that hot, hot air became a problem fast as he was very low over the field. Detail suffered on pic 1, because of this I think.
Very rare that I get these opportunities, since I raely shoot wetlands, and not all have harriers, so it was fun.
Got lucky here.
The harriers are - easier - as they fly low and return now and then. But though it was early and not that hot, hot air became a problem fast as he was very low over the field. Detail suffered on pic 1, because of this I think.
Very rare that I get these opportunities, since I raely shoot wetlands, and not all have harriers, so it was fun.
