• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

1/4" to 3/8" adapter for tripod (1 Viewer)

Roy C

Occasional bird snapper
I have just taken delivery of the Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head. This head has a 3/8" female screw but my tripod has a 1/4" male screw - is there a adapter that can convert the 1/4" to 3/8"?

Cheers
Roy
 
Roy C said:
I have just taken delivery of the Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head. This head has a 3/8" female screw but my tripod has a 1/4" male screw - is there a adapter that can convert the 1/4" to 3/8"?

Cheers
Roy
Yep, these little bits should cost next to nothing from a photographic shop, I've got a couple laying around (or maybe being used, not too sure)... although I have to admit that I don't remember ever buying one, perhaps they came supplied with heads/legsets.

Try this HERE

If you had 3/8 thread on your tripod and had a 1/4 on the head, you'd be in trouble though.

cheers,
Andy
 
Roy C said:
I have just taken delivery of the Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head. This head has a 3/8" female screw but my tripod has a 1/4" male screw - is there a adapter that can convert the 1/4" to 3/8"?

Cheers
Roy

Have you checked that the screw isn't reversible with 3/8 one side and 1/4 other? Some tripods include this, but I suppose it would be obvious if it did.
 
Thanks for the feedback guys - I have just picked-up a pack of two adapters from Jessops for £1.99. Problem solved.

Cheers
Roy
 
Roy C said:
Thanks for the feedback guys - I have just picked-up a pack of two adapters from Jessops for £1.99. Problem solved.

Cheers
Roy
If only all photography problems could be solved with a product costing £1.00 ;)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top