Darren Williams
Active member
Sorry to go over old ground here this subject must be done to death by now but can any of you guys out there give me an un-biased opinion on which lense to choose?? I use a ( probably by now considered 'fossil' of a Canon 300d!) and really want to get a good lense for wildlife photography. One of the main issues regarding the war between these two lenses is the weight problem this is not a worry for me as i am used to lugging a scope all over the place and have a right arm like Popeye's ! What i am really stuck on is the quality of the end result, sharpness of image, i really strive for excellent quality pictures with minimal faffing about post production. ?For me personally the idea of being stuck on a laptop is time wasted not being in the great outdoors. I am not a pro photographer but just want a bit of guidance from all you ladies and gents out there who know! Is the extra bit of telephoto ooomph on the Bigma worth it compared to the Canon or should i just get better camouflage gear and creep up on unsuspecting subjects better! Sorry to sound so flippant but ive read review after review and still feel brain dead , any advice will be much appreciated as long as it doesn't get too technical cos my brain hurts DER !!! Thanks in anticipation Darren