Hallo Lee,
You are right. I wear two hats, for me that's normal but it could be strange for some one else.
My private "hat" thinks that A brands are A brands because of the perfection.
They should not outsource because of the fact that the customer thinks he/she is buying the original brand stuff.
My retailers "hat" tells me that is does not matters what the customer buys, as long as he buys the optics he needs and the brand or origine is not important as long as it fills the needs. But he/she must know!
The mentioning of "Made in Germany" instead of the legal way Made in Germany how it had to be on the Zeiss catalog raised a lot of questions about the origins of the Conquest HD. This was done on purpose by Zeiss, on marketing level, to prevent problems because they did outsource the model but did not want the future customers to know. A bit naive in this world of internet, but that's how it went down according to my Zeiss representative at the end of this soap.
So the first Zeiss reaction was:
It's true!; then came: is this really an issue?; followed by: it was a misprint in the catalog, but they were allready printed so we handed them out, but the Conquest HD is genuine Made in Germany.
A nice example how Marketing and Sales and Advertisement Departments communicated at Zeiss on this matter (and still do).
I hope this makes it a bit more clear.
My only excuse for my Dutch English is that I am a autodidact.
Jan