|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,093
|
Cormorant question
Question.
What 'type' of feet do Cormorants have? I presume they are webbed, but how can they perch in 'flimsy' type trees? Question. What sort of population change have you experienced over the past ten years? Question. I heard somewhere that these 'new' inland populations are continental birds? is this correct? Question. How much (in weight) does an average Cormorant eat per day? Any ideas. Stevie. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Winner of the Copeland Wildlife Photographer of the Year Comp 2009/2010
|
Stevie,I do hope someone can answer your questions.We have lots of Cormorants here.They perch on poles in the sea,they perch for hours on some dead tree trunks in the Lagoon,they sit on the shore line fanning their wings,fascinating birds.
Christine. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,805
|
Steve
As an angler I did make it my business to find out something about them: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Alan Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!. Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012 |
||||
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
|
Definitely webbed.
__________________
Durham Bird Club -Teesmouth Bird Club---RSPB Saltholme---Durham Birding---Local patch - Cowpen Bewley Woodland Park |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
|
I've seen them perched on high tension cablees... never seen them land though, I imagine that is the hard bit!
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
|
I've seen them landing on some pretty thin braches in the tops of tall trees, at Low Barns actually Stevie in the tops of the tall trees to the right of the island from the south hide. They don't seem least bothered when the branch drops four or five feet before rebounding. They just hang on and then settle down. Sometimes two or three perch together like this.
__________________
Durham Bird Club -Teesmouth Bird Club---RSPB Saltholme---Durham Birding---Local patch - Cowpen Bewley Woodland Park |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#7 |
|
conehead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: .
Posts: 6,794
|
The re-colonising inland populations in Britain are made up of a mixture of of Atlantic race (carbo) from the coast and Continental race (sinensis) from Holland, etc., interbreeding freely.
Note re-colonising. This is not a new phenomenon - there is plenty of historical evidence that Cormorants used to be widespread inland breeders in the past, before the invention of accurate guns made them easy to kill off (circa 1750-1800). Cormorants also have a long evolutionary history of nesting in trees; just because a foot is webbed, doesn't mean it can't perch on a branch! May actually give it a better grip. Michael |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,093
|
Hi, Many thanks for all replies.
Been watching birds roost at Durham (BrassPond) last few weeks They all sit on islands made of pallets, then at dusk take to the air before going into roost trees. The trees are Silver Birch approx 35'-40' on an island. To see these birds trying to land is comical, the adults seem to have it sussed out & aim for the more substancial branches with less flex, kind of stalling just before landing. The younger birds on the other hand very often 'crash-land' falling through the branches! Sometimes knocking off their neighbours, some try to grab branches with their bills while falling! I wondered if the continental inland breeding birds had differently developed feet & 'gripping' toes?, as some birds seen to land & hold quite effortlessly. As Ian says branches often sway quite violently, but the birds try their hardest to hang on. As for population/numbers, the pond here isnt huge, but is in the fly-way of the River Wear valley. 10 year ago the max recorded was 12 birds, but mostly only 5-8 seen. (tree roosting was Not carried out then at site) Now there are up to 38!! birds roosting each night. Quite a large % increase. The trees are showing signs of distress due to the numbers involved. Over the same time period the site has lost 4 breeding pairs of GCGrebe, previously being the main colony in the County. (this may well be due to loss of nest sites though) Although 38 birds X 400grams = lots of fish! On the whole i think its our 'common' birds which are often the most interesting, but perhaps overlooked...? Stevie. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,093
|
MF
Had not realised it was a re-colonisation. Wasn't there was a lot of talk to it being linked to decline in N.Sea fish stocks..? What do you think has triggered the return of them inland? Stevie. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
conehead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: .
Posts: 6,794
|
Hi Stevie,
I doubt the Cormroants are responsible for the decline in GCGrebes, they eat very different size fish - in fact, cormorants could help grebes by eating some of the larger predatory fish that are eating the same size fish that the grebes eat. What triggered the return inland - reduced persecution. Quote:
![]() The decline in North Sea fish stocks is due to human overfishing, no more, no less. One trawler can catch as many fish in a day, as a thousand cormorants eat in a year. Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Revere,MA
Posts: 127
|
I watched a cormorant surface next to my boat with a Winter Flounder that I was sure was too big to swallow. I was wrong. It seemed to be stuck in it's throat for a time but the lump soon disapeared.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,805
|
Quote:
I think he meant that the decline of North Sea fish stocked caused by overfishing drove the cormorants from the North Sea where they would normally get their food!. Maybe that was the original reason but I doubt it. Now the living in the Inland Waterways has proved easy. Aand they've grown soft!.
__________________
Alan Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!. Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012 |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,805
|
Quote:
These Cormorants were working the inland waterways the other side of the channel, they have just crossed over and extended their range much as the Collared Dove has extended its range. I don't think overfishing of the sea's has affected this race of Cormorants much at all!. How much have the other fish eating seabirds been affected?. When was the last time you saw a Gannet fishing in your local pond.
__________________
Alan Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!. Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012 |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 91
|
Good point Alan.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Usually on a different wavelength
|
Quote:
Do Gannets eat freshwater fish? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 91
|
I don't know, I have never seen one on a freshwater lake or river.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,805
|
Quote:
Pedants Anonymous |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST YORKSHIRE
Posts: 52
|
I've read somewhere that cormorants and shags are some of the most ancient of birds.
I suppose they do look a bit dinasaurish. However if this is true, what happened to natural selection? Why haven't they developed more waterproof feathers,that don't need spreading out to dry? Auks,ducks,grebes or divers don't need to do this. regards Tony |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
conehead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: .
Posts: 6,794
|
Hi Tony,
They 'deliberately' don't have waterproof feathers (more accurately, have evolved not to). If the feathers get wet, it means they don't trap any air when they dive. That means they can dive deeper, faster, and chase fish more efficiently, because they're not having to fight against the buoyancy of air trapped in their feathers. The downside is that they need to eat more food to supply the body warmth when living in cold water. But it is still a successful strategy. Michael |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Moment
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Plymouth, Devon
Posts: 6,409
|
I thought no one was really sure why Cormorants held out their wings. Certainly some doubt that they do it to dry them - especially since they've been seen doing it in the rain. I even saw that myself once (at Radipole). There used to be a suggestion that the wing-spreading was perhaps to aid digestion. Not sure that theory was ever very popular and I haven't kept up with the arguments.
__________________
Jason Come doleful owl, the messenger of woe, Melancholy's bird, companion of Despair, Sorrow's best friend and Mirth's professed foe The chief discourser that delights sad Care. O come, poor owl, and tell thy woes to me. Which having heard, I'll do the like for thee. (Anon c.1607) |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#22 |
|
conehead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: .
Posts: 6,794
|
Hi Jason,
They'll hold their wings out in the rain, and they'll also hold their wings out even when they've caught nothing and have nothing to digest. Let's face it, they are FISHERMEN . . . "You should've seen the one that got away . . . it was this big . . . . HONEST!!!" |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 72
|
Maybe no one told the cormorants that drying their wings in the rain doesnt really work :-)
Animals in nature often behave in set patterns, even when its innaproriate to do so. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Watch the birdie...
|
Cormorants do present some interesting dilemmas, don't they?
As a birder, it's hard not to be impressed by the critters - they are clearly filling their niche very effectively, and I enjoy watching them immensely - common birds or not. But as a(nother) angler, I can't help but resent the same birds for eating "my" fish! Of course, there has also been an (apparent) increase in the numbers of other fish eating birds in this part of the world - goosander seem to becoming seasonally as common on some rivers as herring gulls - and I wonder what might be the cause of that influx - assuming there has been an actual increase, and not simply the paranoid imaginings of worried anglers! I actually fish the "Brasspond" mentioned by Stevie Evans and hadn't realised the cormorant presence was quite as significant - I'll have a closer look next time...
__________________
Keith Reeder Canon 7D, Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 OS, TCs. www.capture-the-moment.co.uk Last edited by blythkeith : Thursday 20th May 2004 at 11:41. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST YORKSHIRE
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
If I say the word penguins, should the same not apply,or do penguins have feathers and/or blubber? Regards Tony |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cormorant or Shag? | DaveN | Bird Identification Q&A | 5 | Wednesday 17th September 2003 09:44 |
| Bunting question | ArnelGuanlao | Bird Identification Q&A | 7 | Thursday 26th June 2003 17:24 |
| Birdforum and Birds-pix -- a question of netiquette | rb_stern | Birds & Birding | 6 | Thursday 1st May 2003 17:23 |
| Strix question | Bert VDK | Birds Of Prey | 4 | Wednesday 12th March 2003 16:30 |