Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 9th April 2008, 23:18   #1
Gustavo Jimenez
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas
Posts: 65
Category:Locations

Discussion thread for Category:Locations. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

Gustavo Jimenez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 9th April 2008, 23:23   #2
Gustavo Jimenez
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas
Posts: 65
The Buzzard of the new world are not inside of the Falconiformes order. Last time they put it in the Ciconiiformes order, but now nobody dont know where it belongs or maybe to intruduce a new order Carthatiformes.
Gustavo Jimenez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 10th April 2008, 01:32   #3
njlarsen
Opus Editor

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portsmouth, Dominica
Posts: 4,763
When it was decided to go ahead and do a taxonomic system in Opus, a rather arbitrary decision was made to follow Clements 2007. Changes to this may happen when a new version of the major checklists come out, but not as individual scientific papers come out. This is similar to the way common and scientific names are handled in Opus: status quo is maintained unless there is a consensus for a change among the checklists.

And yes, Clements treat all day raptors as falling within falconiformes, including new world vultures. There may be data out there to dispute that placement, but the editors (all of us) of Opus are not taxonomic experts and cannot decide which papers to believe and which not. By waiting until a clear position is taken by the checklist makers, Opus is somewhat more stable than what it would otherwise be.

It would, however, be perfectly acceptable, even great, if you could add a little on the position of these birds to the appropriate Category, probably best to Category:Cathartidae, saying that recent papers suggest another placement, and give a reference if at all possible.

Cheers
Niels
njlarsen is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Category B to A upgrades Ben Rackstraw Birds & Birding 13 Thursday 24th March 2005 20:44


Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.09841490 seconds with 13 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:38.