|
Welcome, Guest. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas
Posts: 65
|
Category:Locations
Discussion thread for Category:Locations. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas
Posts: 65
|
The Buzzard of the new world are not inside of the Falconiformes order. Last time they put it in the Ciconiiformes order, but now nobody dont know where it belongs or maybe to intruduce a new order Carthatiformes.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Opus Editor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portsmouth, Dominica
Posts: 4,763
|
When it was decided to go ahead and do a taxonomic system in Opus, a rather arbitrary decision was made to follow Clements 2007. Changes to this may happen when a new version of the major checklists come out, but not as individual scientific papers come out. This is similar to the way common and scientific names are handled in Opus: status quo is maintained unless there is a consensus for a change among the checklists.
And yes, Clements treat all day raptors as falling within falconiformes, including new world vultures. There may be data out there to dispute that placement, but the editors (all of us) of Opus are not taxonomic experts and cannot decide which papers to believe and which not. By waiting until a clear position is taken by the checklist makers, Opus is somewhat more stable than what it would otherwise be. It would, however, be perfectly acceptable, even great, if you could add a little on the position of these birds to the appropriate Category, probably best to Category:Cathartidae, saying that recent papers suggest another placement, and give a reference if at all possible. Cheers Niels |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Category B to A upgrades | Ben Rackstraw | Birds & Birding | 13 | Thursday 24th March 2005 20:44 |