|
Welcome, Guest. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
|
Comparing 8x42/8x32 BL BR
Has anyone any thoughts on the above, I've been looking at the specs for these two and wondering if the extra field of view and close focusing of the 8x32 would outweigh the optical advantages (if any?) of the bigger 8x42 model?
Matt |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
|
To be honest its the lighter weight, size and handling that sold me the 8x33 HG (next model up - but the comments still apply).
I do have some reasonable 8x40 something in another brand but after seeing what I grabbed most of the time it was the smaller 8x32. If you are doing a lot of low light birding then you may find that the x42 is marginally better, also as everyones eyes are different you may find that either one is easier to use, but only you can decide that. My views alone and you can find folks who prefer the bigger bins for equally valid reasons. Best of luck with whatever you choose anyway. J |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 14,806
|
Strangely according to Minox's literature the 8x32 are the same weight as the 8x42! I was surprised to read this, but they do feel much the same in the hand, must check it on the scales.
__________________
www.blueskybirds.co.uk |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 18
|
On the Minox UK website they give 80g difference between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 250
|
Ignore the Germans.....
![]() Believe what we put on the Newpro / Minox UK website.... 8x32 BL - 525g 8x42 BL & 10x42 BL - just a tad over 600g each (Sorry, I'm at home and have no access to those binos or scales....!) ATB, Dave. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canterbury, UK
Posts: 2,299
|
I recall reading somehwere that the difference between 8x32s and 8x42s is about 25 minutes at either end of the day! Mind you, on the basis that somewhen that 25 mins might be vital I use 8x42s!
John |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Far West
Posts: 1,060
|
Quote:
We go to Jasper, Alberta each summer where daylight lingers past 2300 hours. I bird all day with my SE 8X32 and around 2100 switch to the Ultravid 7X42. The only downside is sleep deprivation! John |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
|
Finally had a chance to try out the Minox 8x32 today at Cleyspy's new showroom next door to the Cley visitor centre and was invited to compare it with the Opticron Verano BGA 8x32 and Nikon Monarch 8x36 at my leisure!
First impressions the Nikon seemed to be a bit brighter than both the Opticron and Minox but the Minox had slightly more clarity at midrange, the design of all three was very impressive but the Minox has to be handled to truely appreciate the build quality, also felt very compact in the hands. After enjoying the larger field of view and extra close focusing and compactness of these 8x32 models I've answered my own question!!! Matt |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#9 |
|
birder since 2003
|
With 8x, 32mm will win most times. At 10x, I prefer 42mm.
__________________
humorblog |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilversum, The Netherlands
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
I just bought a pair of BL 8x32 BR's this weekend on the annual bird festival in Holland. After six months of using big 985 gram porro's, I couldn't be happier with these small, lightweight bins! Even for 32 mm bins they are lightweight at 525 grams. Clarity and sharpness are excellent, FOV is 130 m/1000m, and the handling... well, only hours after I bought them and played with them, they felt as comfortable in my hands as if I've had them for years. Amazingly good fit, quite compact and just right. A delight to carry around. No more neck problems in the future, I've finally come to my senses. Even my 685 gram Bynolyt roofs were a problem I couldn't cope with, and I got rid of them in the end. The 4 mm exit pupil will do for 95 % of my birding, I can live with that. Now I'll have to find a lightweight Minox scope as well and toss out the Zeiss. Am I glad I popped in on the Minox stand last sunday! Best regards, Ronald |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 8x32 v 8x42? | amh2029 | Binoculars | 23 | Sunday 30th December 2007 14:37 |
| 8x32 or 8x42? | Thomas T. | Binoculars | 31 | Wednesday 5th December 2007 13:46 |
| 8x32 or 8x42 for woodlands? | calbirder | Binoculars | 4 | Thursday 16th November 2006 12:59 |
| Comparing a Leica 8x32 BN to my Nikon Monarch's 8x42 | denco@comcast.n | Binoculars | 2 | Tuesday 4th July 2006 10:54 |
| 8X32 FL vs 8X42 FL | henry link | Zeiss | 28 | Sunday 20th November 2005 22:31 |