Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Thursday 12th June 2008, 12:16   #1
matt green
Registered User
 
matt green's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
Comparing 8x42/8x32 BL BR

Has anyone any thoughts on the above, I've been looking at the specs for these two and wondering if the extra field of view and close focusing of the 8x32 would outweigh the optical advantages (if any?) of the bigger 8x42 model?

Matt

matt green is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 12th June 2008, 21:02   #2
iveljay
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wiltshire, England
Posts: 183
To be honest its the lighter weight, size and handling that sold me the 8x33 HG (next model up - but the comments still apply).
I do have some reasonable 8x40 something in another brand but after seeing what I grabbed most of the time it was the smaller 8x32.
If you are doing a lot of low light birding then you may find that the x42 is marginally better, also as everyones eyes are different you may find that either one is easier to use, but only you can decide that.
My views alone and you can find folks who prefer the bigger bins for equally valid reasons. Best of luck with whatever you choose anyway.

J
iveljay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 13th June 2008, 13:41   #3
postcardcv
Super Moderator
 
postcardcv's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 14,806
Strangely according to Minox's literature the 8x32 are the same weight as the 8x42! I was surprised to read this, but they do feel much the same in the hand, must check it on the scales.
__________________
www.blueskybirds.co.uk
postcardcv is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 13th June 2008, 16:20   #4
Hauki
Registered User
 
Hauki's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 18
On the Minox UK website they give 80g difference between the two.
Hauki is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 22nd June 2008, 22:17   #5
davem
Registered User

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 250
Ignore the Germans.....

Believe what we put on the Newpro / Minox UK website....

8x32 BL - 525g

8x42 BL & 10x42 BL - just a tad over 600g each (Sorry, I'm at home and have no access to those binos or scales....!)

ATB,

Dave.
__________________
Dave Morgan
Newpro UK website
davem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 22nd June 2008, 23:44   #6
John Cantelo
Registered User
 
John Cantelo's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canterbury, UK
Posts: 2,299
I recall reading somehwere that the difference between 8x32s and 8x42s is about 25 minutes at either end of the day! Mind you, on the basis that somewhen that 25 mins might be vital I use 8x42s!
John
John Cantelo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd June 2008, 01:19   #7
Pileatus
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Far West
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cantelo View Post
I recall reading somehwere that the difference between 8x32s and 8x42s is about 25 minutes at either end of the day! Mind you, on the basis that somewhen that 25 mins might be vital I use 8x42s!
John
John,

We go to Jasper, Alberta each summer where daylight lingers past 2300 hours.
I bird all day with my SE 8X32 and around 2100 switch to the Ultravid 7X42. The only downside is sleep deprivation!

John
Pileatus is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 25th June 2008, 22:57   #8
matt green
Registered User
 
matt green's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
Finally had a chance to try out the Minox 8x32 today at Cleyspy's new showroom next door to the Cley visitor centre and was invited to compare it with the Opticron Verano BGA 8x32 and Nikon Monarch 8x36 at my leisure!

First impressions the Nikon seemed to be a bit brighter than both the Opticron and Minox but the Minox had slightly more clarity at midrange, the design of all three was very impressive but the Minox has to be handled to truely appreciate the build quality, also felt very compact in the hands.

After enjoying the larger field of view and extra close focusing and compactness of these 8x32 models I've answered my own question!!!

Matt
matt green is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 30th June 2008, 20:30   #9
Tero
birder since 2003
 
Tero's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 6,603
With 8x, 32mm will win most times. At 10x, I prefer 42mm.
__________________
humorblog
Tero is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Tuesday 26th August 2008, 03:58   #10
KorHaan
Registered User
 
KorHaan's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilversum, The Netherlands
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt green View Post
Finally had a chance to try out the Minox 8x32 today at Cleyspy's new showroom next door to the Cley visitor centre and was invited to compare it with the Opticron Verano BGA 8x32 and Nikon Monarch 8x36 at my leisure!

First impressions the Nikon seemed to be a bit brighter than both the Opticron and Minox but the Minox had slightly more clarity at midrange, the design of all three was very impressive but the Minox has to be handled to truely appreciate the build quality, also felt very compact in the hands.

After enjoying the larger field of view and extra close focusing and compactness of these 8x32 models I've answered my own question!!!

Matt
Hello Matt,

I just bought a pair of BL 8x32 BR's this weekend on the annual bird festival in Holland.
After six months of using big 985 gram porro's, I couldn't be happier with these small, lightweight bins! Even for 32 mm bins they are lightweight at 525 grams. Clarity and sharpness are excellent, FOV is 130 m/1000m, and the handling... well, only hours after I bought them and played with them, they felt as comfortable in my hands as if I've had them for years. Amazingly good fit, quite compact and just right. A delight to carry around.
No more neck problems in the future, I've finally come to my senses. Even my 685 gram Bynolyt roofs were a problem I couldn't cope with, and I got rid of them in the end.
The 4 mm exit pupil will do for 95 % of my birding, I can live with that.

Now I'll have to find a lightweight Minox scope as well and toss out the Zeiss.

Am I glad I popped in on the Minox stand last sunday!

Best regards,

Ronald
KorHaan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8x32 v 8x42? amh2029 Binoculars 23 Sunday 30th December 2007 14:37
8x32 or 8x42? Thomas T. Binoculars 31 Wednesday 5th December 2007 13:46
8x32 or 8x42 for woodlands? calbirder Binoculars 4 Thursday 16th November 2006 12:59
Comparing a Leica 8x32 BN to my Nikon Monarch's 8x42 denco@comcast.n Binoculars 2 Tuesday 4th July 2006 10:54
8X32 FL vs 8X42 FL henry link Zeiss 28 Sunday 20th November 2005 22:31

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.14827991 seconds with 20 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09.