|
Welcome, Guest. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Opus Editor
|
Common Stonechat
Discussion thread for Common Stonechat. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#2 |
|
Opus Editor
|
"sometimes" considered conspecific - what authority splits, what authority lumps?
also, torquata vs. torquatus?
__________________
--Alex (formerly 'overworkedirish') My Gallery | My *NEW* Life List of Life (updated 30 August 2008) "Work is the scourge of the drinking class." ~Oscar Wilde |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#3 |
|
Opus Editor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portsmouth, Dominica
Posts: 4,763
|
Torquatus. I don't have the full data present, but no split was preferred by the first Sibley and Monroe and HBW, while e.g., clements is on the side of three species. I am not entirely sure where the H&M is on this particular issue. Several more subspecies has been proposed for splitting if my memory serves me right (See the taxonomy forum)
Niels |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| winchat/common stonechat | ekopa | Bird Identification Q&A | 7 | Friday 12th October 2007 13:27 |
| Stonechat? | maarten1 | Bird Identification Q&A | 5 | Sunday 28th January 2007 15:42 |
| Common Stonechat | Rakesh | Photos of New Species for OPUS | 1 | Monday 22nd January 2007 17:57 |
| Is this a Stonechat? | Roy C | Bird Identification Q&A | 2 | Friday 30th June 2006 21:00 |
| For Stonechat | Jasonbirder | Lists | 45 | Thursday 29th July 2004 01:35 |