Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 28th January 2004, 00:48   #1
laika
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 33
Testing binoculars

Here are some examples from www.kikkertspesialisten.no

Swarovski 10x50 SLC WB get 10/12points for resolution and 9-/12 for image brightness.
Swarovski 8x32 EL get 10/12 for resolution and 7+/12 for image brigthness.

Everyone accept that the biggest binocular is the brightest one,but why give both binoculars 10 points for resolution? You can of course see more details with the one with highest magnification!.

Someone will of course say it is wrong to compare 8x magnification to 10x,but why is it then OK to compare a 50mm lense with a 32mm when speaking about brightness?

laika is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 28th January 2004, 03:34   #2
Art Thorn
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
In fact, resolution is related to aperature (Dawes Limit), so comparing binoculars with different objective lens sizes makes no technical sense. So why compare at all? I think these comparisons are just so people can have a starting point. My personal favorite binoculars are 10 power, one pair with 32 mm objectives and one pair with 42 mm objectives, and one pair roof prism and one pair porro prism. But that is only after using many different binocs. I still found all of the reviews usefull, as a starting point.
Art Thorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 28th January 2004, 08:56   #3
Leif
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hindhead, Surrey
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Thorn
In fact, resolution is related to aperature (Dawes Limit), so comparing binoculars with different objective lens sizes makes no technical sense. So why compare at all? I think these comparisons are just so people can have a starting point. My personal favorite binoculars are 10 power, one pair with 32 mm objectives and one pair with 42 mm objectives, and one pair roof prism and one pair porro prism. But that is only after using many different binocs. I still found all of the reviews usefull, as a starting point.
In practice resolution is determined not just by aperture, but also by optical quality, and optical design. Aperture sets the upper theoretical limit.
Leif is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 28th January 2004, 14:13   #4
laika
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 33
At www.betterviewdesired.com Steven Ingram use a so called NEED chart,perhaps that's a better way to evaluate resolution?
laika is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 28th January 2004, 15:30   #5
Art Thorn
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
That does not solve the problem, because you will see that more magnification increases the NEED score.
Art Thorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coloured binoculars? digi-birder Binoculars 16 Friday 23rd July 2004 22:47
Who makes Falkenhorst binoculars? Swissboy Others 7 Wednesday 14th January 2004 15:37
Digiscoping with binoculars CliffMartin Andy Bright's Digiscoping Forum 4 Friday 3rd October 2003 19:55

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.10880303 seconds with 15 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25.