Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Magnifying the passion for nature. Zeiss Victory Harpia 95. New!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 373 votes, 4.94 average.
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 01:05   #51
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
I would guess that the HP might be similar to or a bit better than the Diamondbacks given it's price point it seemed to be competing in the Monarch price range. The non-HP version don't appear to be phase-compensated (so they're a rather old design) so that would be rather worse view.

I note that the Equinox HP (and the Equinox) have narrower FOV than the Diamondback (which is a nice feature) but wide FOV also comes with less resistance to stray light (unless like Zeiss you work on it!) so they might be more resistant to veiling glare than Diamondback.

As Tero says even the sale items are returnable for a full refund. Order both and pick one! And then write up a comparative review for BF
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 01:15   #52
w.travis
Registered User

 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 133
thanks for the replies...I would order both if I had the money to order both...or I would just order one pair that was in the 400 dollar range...I read on eagleoptics.com about the Equinox HP and they seem to have higher technology put into the optics than the Diamondbacks...thanks again and any other comments/suggestions from anyone will still be appreciated.
w.travis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 02:28   #53
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Much as I like EO I do take some of their writing with a pinch of salt. It is occasionally a bit too "glowing". I saw one mentioning a "generous field of view" for a bin that had by any reasonable measure a narrow field of view.

Plus that writing could have been done sometime back: we've all see high performance from three years ago being eclipsed (e.g see the Vanguard EDT thread and look out for the review ... 8x42 ED bins for $280 shippped? Who good could they possibly be?)

The buy both (and send one back) would just set you back the cost of one, plus shipping (about $10 UPS for me) and perhaps one months interest if you can't cover the cost on the card.

Trying before you decide is the best way to go with bins.

Or wait for FrankD's EDT review.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 21:54   #54
chartwell99
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston, texas, usa
Posts: 614
[quote=Kevin Purcell;1321851]Much as I like EO I do take some of their writing with a pinch of salt. It is occasionally a bit too "glowing". I saw one mentioning a "generous field of view" for a bin that had by any reasonable measure a narrow field of view.

EO's product descriptions may be occasionally a bit enthusiastic, but their "blow out" deals can make the trip to their website well worthwhile. The best of these in my view is EO's present offer for the Vortex Stokes 10 x 42 DLS at $449, essentially half of the original selling price. These are remarkably good binoculars, offering absolutely top grade Japanese build quality, superb ergonomics and very credible $800+ level optical performance. The Vortex no questions asked warranty is no slouch either. Of all the "binocular bargains" discussed so far, this is the most compelling by a wide margin.
chartwell99 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 22:38   #55
Tero
Master Naturalist, NE
 
Tero's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8,372
OK, I checked them out. The 10x Audubon Raptor* has some quality in the build, but is less relaxed in view than my roofs. Even the dof is less or the same than roofs. Stick to 8x on the Raprors. [though those will also have some glare when looking anywhere near the sun] Good price for a waterproof 8x porro. Focusing smooth. Eye cups do not stay out, but I did actually need them at all. I used them with cups in even without glasses.

*http://www.eagleoptics.com/index.asp?pid=3825
__________________
humorblog
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/ Blackbirds:https://flic.kr/s/aHskVgyDYs Nebraska birds: https://flic.kr/s/aHskVe3cgw
ABA list: 356 black-bellied whistling duck

Last edited by Tero : Friday 31st October 2008 at 12:45.
Tero is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 22:38   #56
NWBirder
Just Need One More Pair

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 566
I am wondering how those local retailers who still have their Stokes marked at $600 survive in the competition. I thought Vortex was firm on their price. My local store clerk will not budge on the price.
NWBirder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 22:59   #57
NWBirder
Just Need One More Pair

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartwell99 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Purcell View Post
Much as I like EO I do take some of their writing with a pinch of salt. It is occasionally a bit too "glowing". I saw one mentioning a "generous field of view" for a bin that had by any reasonable measure a narrow field of view.
EO's product descriptions may be occasionally a bit enthusiastic, but their "blow out" deals can make the trip to their website well worthwhile. The best of these in my view is EO's present offer for the Vortex Stokes 10 x 42 DLS at $449, essentially half of the original selling price. These are remarkably good binoculars, offering absolutely top grade Japanese build quality, superb ergonomics and very credible $800+ level optical performance. The Vortex no questions asked warranty is no slouch either. Of all the "binocular bargains" discussed so far, this is the most compelling by a wide margin.

I will probably seriously consider Razor if their price comes down from where they are right now. With the superior quality of Hawke Frontier ED over Razor, I may just get a Hawke and be done with it.
NWBirder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:00   #58
chartwell99
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston, texas, usa
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWBirder View Post
I am wondering how those local retailers who still have their Stokes marked at $600 survive in the competition. I thought Vortex was firm on their price. My local store clerk will not budge on the price.
Vortex is firm on their price as a general rule but the Stokes DLS 10 x 42 bins are being discontinued. I "need" another 10 power bin like a hole in the head but I simply couldn't resist this one at this price.
chartwell99 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:27   #59
Tero
Master Naturalist, NE
 
Tero's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8,372
Sounds like a good deal. Everyone needs one good 10x.
__________________
humorblog
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/ Blackbirds:https://flic.kr/s/aHskVgyDYs Nebraska birds: https://flic.kr/s/aHskVe3cgw
ABA list: 356 black-bellied whistling duck
Tero is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:35   #60
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartwell99 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Purcell View Post
Much as I like EO I do take some of their writing with a pinch of salt. It is occasionally a bit too "glowing". I saw one mentioning a "generous field of view" for a bin that had by any reasonable measure a narrow field of view.
EO's product descriptions may be occasionally a bit enthusiastic, but their "blow out" deals can make the trip to their website well worthwhile. The best of these in my view is EO's present offer for the Vortex Stokes 10 x 42 DLS at $449, essentially half of the original selling price. These are remarkably good binoculars, offering absolutely top grade Japanese build quality, superb ergonomics and very credible $800+ level optical performance. The Vortex no questions asked warranty is no slouch either. Of all the "binocular bargains" discussed so far, this is the most compelling by a wide margin.
I do find the EO site useful for two thing: price and specs. I have bought quite a few "hot deals" from them (and some regular priced bins).

I have looked through Stoke DLS 8x42 in real life late last summer. Some friends have a pair at a holiday home very near the beach and some saltwater and freshwater lagoon habitats. Unfortunately the only bins I'd brought with me to compare was my Yosemite 6x30 and the Eagle Optics Raptors (Vixen Foresta) 10x42 porros so no direct comparisons for power or for prism type (and both of these bins hit above their price when compared to roofs). I was very enthused though: $800 bins ... they must be great.

But ... I was not as impressed as I thought I'd be! The "Wow" is at low price levels e.g. the wide field would be impressive but I'd felt that with a Diamondback and the EO Raptor is pretty good for a 10x (with better color). The DLS had some other subtle improvements.

FOV is good (7.3 degrees), bright and flat but with notable stray color at the edges of the field. ER was good with eyeglasses. The image is sharp but I suspect not as sharp as the Hawke or Promaster today. I did check for stray stray light control and I suspect they are better than the Diamondbacks (which do have problems with that) but they didn't differ a huge amount from the two porros I had with me. This is not a recent design so those results are not too surprising.

They paid around $800 for them and I rather though them overpriced at that. More time and a couple of other bins would have resulted in a better comparison but they didn't move me for $800 like I thought I should have been moved

Now we have very good ED bins at the $500 and below price point and competition from other bins (like the Razor and Viper) that make one wonder if they were good for their time but not so good now. Both the Hawkes and the Promaster control stray color very well (much better than the DLS at the edge of field where it is worst).

The build quality was good. The grip was excellent: the armor is rather thin but I could wrap my fingers around the barrel (and pointed out how thick the barrel walls are in the plastic enclosure of the Diamondbacks). They felt solid perhaps a little heavier than I'd like: at 26oz heavier than the EO porros but the same as the new EDs.

Next time I'm up there I'll take my bins with me and try a more detailed comparison.

I don't think I'm totally alone in these views either e.g. see

http://www.birddigiscoping.com/2005/...s-leupold.html
http://www.birddigiscoping.com/2007/...42-review.html

The 10x FOV seems narrow too: < 6 degrees.

But perhaps for some the the tradeoff might be worthwhile (the warranty is good!) but I disagree with the last sentence: the new Chinese ED bins are the current bargain. This is Stokes an old model on closeout.

This "mid range bin" region between $200 and $800 is changing dramatically right now with the top end being attacked by $500 bins. I the next year I suspect most of the "brands" including Vortex will have Chinese made ED bins at lower price points. I rather suspect that's why these bins have come to EOL.

Last edited by Kevin Purcell : Thursday 30th October 2008 at 23:50.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:45   #61
FrankD
Registered User
 
FrankD's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,365
Let me know how those 8x42 Raptor porros are optically after you guys get them. Tero's comments have me interested but I really don't need another 8x42 porro right now. Still the field of view is very respectable and at that price.....
FrankD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:49   #62
Tero
Master Naturalist, NE
 
Tero's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8,372
The 10x Raptors [see above link, not Kevin's Raptors] reminded me a lot of the 10x Fujinons. And we know of course that the 7x Fujinons were the best of the three.
__________________
humorblog
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/ Blackbirds:https://flic.kr/s/aHskVgyDYs Nebraska birds: https://flic.kr/s/aHskVe3cgw
ABA list: 356 black-bellied whistling duck

Last edited by Tero : Friday 31st October 2008 at 15:49.
Tero is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Thursday 30th October 2008, 23:54   #63
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWBirder View Post
I am wondering how those local retailers who still have their Stokes marked at $600 survive in the competition. I thought Vortex was firm on their price. My local store clerk will not budge on the price.
I think the market they're targeted at aren't that price sensitive or as "well-informed" as we are (read that as "normal people aren't obsessive optic geeks" ).

The folks that had the DLS I played with are retired, upper-middle class, casual birdwatchers (not birders!). DLS stays at their second home where they aren't most of the time. I think that's pretty much the "Stokes" market.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 31st October 2008, 00:04   #64
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tero View Post
The 10x Raptors reminded me a lot of the 10x Fujinons. And we know of course that the 7x Fujinons were the best of the three.
Not the Raptors I'm talking about above are the Eagle Optics Raptors aka Vixen Foresta are essentially a Japanese-made $300 porro and not the Audubon Raptors (which retailed for about half that and are Chinese-made (I think). Though I will do a comparison when they appear.

You'd think with all the birds families out there we'd have fewer name clashes

Audubon Icterids, perhaps?

Or the Promaster Parids? Or the Swift Apodids (perhaps a bit redundant).

Or the Bushnell Fringillids? Hawke Accipters?

Leica Larids? Zeiss Tyrannids (after the Conquest and the Victory what else could it be?)

Plenty of choices.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 31st October 2008, 15:44   #65
OwenM
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AL
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWBirder View Post
I will probably seriously consider Razor if their price comes down from where they are right now. With the superior quality of Hawke Frontier ED over Razor, I may just get a Hawke and be done with it.
Can you point me to where that comparison was made? I've apparently missed it...thanks.
OwenM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 31st October 2008, 16:05   #66
NWBirder
Just Need One More Pair

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwenM View Post
Can you point me to where that comparison was made? I've apparently missed it...thanks.
I was google searching Promaster and came upon several sites that have reviewed these binos. There are few places these two were briefly mentioned together by a couple of respected experts. My take-away impression is "Promaster/Hawke is better optically". I need to go back to check Frank's review to decide whether I want a wider angle version from Hawke or narrower angle version from Promaster.
NWBirder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 31st October 2008, 18:35   #67
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Hawke/Promaster reviews from people other than "us"? Do post the links (perhaps on a new thread).
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 1st November 2008, 00:42   #68
Steve C
Registered User
 
Steve C's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon
Posts: 3,375
I just could not reist this.

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...ct_id=10104725

__________________
Steve

"Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt.
Steve C is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2009 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 1st November 2008, 00:59   #69
ceasar
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 10,742
Steve,
Re the Walmart Bins link: Why don't you be the first to ask a question? (about them)
Bob
ceasar is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 1st November 2008, 01:13   #70
Tero
Master Naturalist, NE
 
Tero's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8,372
But Steve, they are extremely portable. They might be worth at least 10 dollars of the price just for that.

The Olympus may be worth a look
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...ct_id=10104727
__________________
humorblog
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/ Blackbirds:https://flic.kr/s/aHskVgyDYs Nebraska birds: https://flic.kr/s/aHskVe3cgw
ABA list: 356 black-bellied whistling duck

Last edited by Tero : Saturday 1st November 2008 at 01:15.
Tero is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 1st November 2008, 02:12   #71
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
I see they must be collector's items (they're not available in stores and not available online) that would justify that price
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 1st November 2008, 03:19   #72
Steve C
Registered User
 
Steve C's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon
Posts: 3,375
Says they're in stock. I even got brave and clicked the add to cart button. Still said $7,844.00, ready to ship. I was far too cowardly to go further, lest I inadvertantly hit the wrong button.
__________________
Steve

"Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt.
Steve C is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2009 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Sunday 2nd November 2008, 08:45   #73
ceasar
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 10,742
Eagle Optics just notified me that they would send me a Binocular for reconfirming my address and e-mail. Now that's a bargain! Even if it is a 7 x 18. It looks like one of the Sportoptics they list.

I wonder if Henry Link is interested in testing it?

Bob
ceasar is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Sunday 2nd November 2008, 21:14   #74
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
I got one of those too ... not sure to reply or not.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 5th November 2008, 16:01   #75
FrankD
Registered User
 
FrankD's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,365
Darn. I didn't get it.

So what is the verdict on those 8x42 Raptors?
FrankD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Craghopper bargains Baron Birder Outdoor Clothing 16 Sunday 8th August 2010 18:27
Binocular bargains Bubbs Nikon 8 Wednesday 30th May 2007 17:23
Paramo November bargains Chris Oates Outdoor Clothing 18 Saturday 2nd December 2006 22:44
Bargains graham_t Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD 4 Wednesday 31st August 2005 18:57
Book Bargains s.g. Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD 3 Sunday 3rd July 2005 00:08

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.21174788 seconds with 35 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07.