![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Help pick binoculars for my sister, b-in-law, and kids in South Africa
My sister had a pair of Optolyth 8x30 porros that were fantastic, but one side went fungus on her. Im looking into getting them worked on...but she needs some replacements...ASAP.
They have a pair of 7x35 Fuji Meibos 8x25 Nikon Sportstar III 8.2 degrees FOV 8x30 Japanese classic porro with no coatings (oldest son is using age 9) Kids are aged 2, 7, 9 She really liked the light weight and smallness of the Optolyth 8x30s (about 15 oz.s IIRC. The Optolyth had great optics too. Im thinking Leupold Yosemite 8x30 Bushnell Excursion 8x28 Nikon Monarch 8x36 and another pair of Nikon 8x25 Sportstar III 8.2 degrees. Perhaps a Pentax 8x24 UCF WR? Or I tried some Nikon ATB 8x25 reverse porros today, and they seemed pretty good. Or maybe some Pentax Papillos 6.5x21? What say you? Trying to keep costs down as well. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 88
|
Greetings,
I like my wife's Yosemite 8x30's a lot. They seem almost as sharp as my 8x32 Nikon SE's in the middle, although the sweet spot is smaller on the Yosemite. I also liked the view of the 6x30 Yosemite's as well, but my wife seemed to like the 8x32 better, so that's what she got! ![]() The price is excellent, and the smaller IP distance makes them good for most children as well. Regarsd, Gary Last edited by teamgs : Tuesday 2nd December 2008 at 07:21. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
birder since 2003
|
The Bushnell Excursion 8x32 regular..not EX...will give more full bino feel than 8x28, and does not cost much more. The 8x28 will work too.
__________________
humorblog |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
What do you think about the Monarch 8x36? If Im going to get a 20 oz bino, I think the Monarchs would be better than the Bushnell Excursion 8x32....no? Bigger exit pupil and objectives for brightness at the same weight....but less aparent fov. Plus the Monarch 8x42 seem to have a good reputation. I had some 8x36 Sporters that I liked but they lacked a bit....and the focus wheel/knob had some play. The Monarchs are lighter with better coatings and made in Japan as opposed to China for the Sporters.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Also Vortex Hurricane 8x28 vs Fury 8x28 vs Bushnell Excursion 8x28?
I looked through and handled some 8x32 Vortex Fury's today and was impressed....but that may be out of my price range. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
birder since 2003
|
Um, not the Hurricane. The others OK.
I am not a fan of 8x36 Monarchs. 8x42 OK, both made in China. Typically you pay 500 and up for anything made in Japan. Some Fujinons once in a while for less. http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=93430
__________________
humorblog Last edited by Tero : Tuesday 2nd December 2008 at 02:29. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Monarchs made in China?
Fascinating. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
birder since 2003
|
Yes, the label Nikon Japan is confusing. Another label says Made in China, at least the last 4 years.
But even all the parts for Leupolds are made in China, also some Europeans. Assembly in a another country allows "made in.." sticker for that country.
__________________
humorblog |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
I dont know much about roofs...dont have much experience with them. Weight is a primary concern.
I thought the Monarchs were highly regarded. How about some help on the cheaper roof prism front. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
The Yosemite 8x30 is a lock. Id like to get a decent roof as well, on the lighter weight side.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
birder since 2003
|
I have looked at the 8x36 Monarch from time to time, but Pentax 8x32 SP beats it for a flatter more even view. There may be some 8x36 Pentax models worth looking at. Search the Pentax section. Some are on sale.
these http://www.eagleoptics.com/index.asp?pid=4168 on sale but returnable
__________________
humorblog Last edited by Tero : Tuesday 2nd December 2008 at 03:15. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Those got considerable larger and weigh more.....but thanks for the suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,120
|
Quote:
Leupold Katmai 6x32 or 8x32 (the former gets better reviews Made in Japan, I think. For under $300. Regarding the "Made in Japan" there the Leupold Cascade porros are Made in Japan (IIRC FrankD's comments) for $230. So you don't have to go to $500 for Japanese bins. But more and more of them (especially newer bins) are now Made in China. That said Chinese bins are very good these days. My Pentax HS 8x36 are Chinese though it took me two days to notice the made in china on the Pentax aluminum label not on a piece of sticky plastic! They seem proud enough to use the same style of labeling as their Japanese versions. And they feel very "Japanese" especially in the strap and case (they're thicker than the usual cheap Chinese nylon). I was amused as I though they were Japanese ... they "looked" Japanese to me. And the Pentax HS 8x36 is another one to add to your list. Perhaps a little heavier than you wish (low 20 ounces) though it feels lighter for some odd reason. On sale for $99 to $120 (see the links on the Binocular Bargains thread). Normally $180. I feel it's one of the best roofs below $200 - the nicest balance of features. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Whats the AFOV on the Pentax 8x36 HS?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Looking for a pic of the eyepiece lens.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Im drifting back to the Monarch 8x36.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,120
|
Using the usual approximation for a 6.5 degree FOV the AFOV is 52 degrees.
But the narrow FOV is what helps its performance: a wide FOV makes suppressing stray light a lot more difficult. Everything in a bin is a compromise. IMHO making decision based on the AFOV is not a good idea. FOV I can understand. And of course if you fix the magnification then FOV and AFOV scale together. But if you really like AFOV go for 10x ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Well, FOV is important too. Ill take a wider FOV with edge dropoff over a tight FOV sharp to the edge.
The 8x36 Monarchs seem to have a decent FOV and AFOV. 367ft and 56 degrees. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
birder since 2003
|
If I had Monarchs 8x36 and Yosemite 8x30 to pick from, I would go for the Yosemite. Very cute too.
__________________
humorblog |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Basin, Oregon
Posts: 1,422
|
The Monarchs are just OK binoculars. I have one in 8x42. They are not as good as the Vortex Fury, which is where I would go, were I in your shoes looking for a decent roof without breaking the bank. CameralandNY has demos right now. The Fury is brighter, the resolution is a tad better, and the FOV is better than the Monarch. The x32 Fury has exceptional fov, 445' @ 6.5x (I have one of these, and like it a lot) and 414' @ 8x. They are $239/demo at Cameraland.
The Yosemite choice can't be faulted. It is the stand out choice for youngsters or for anyone needing narrower than average IPD.
__________________
Steve "Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
What do you think about Papillos for a kids bino?
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
birder since 2003
|
Well, they seem fairly rugged. In fact most reverse porros are almost unbreakable. Here is a pretty good one.
http://www.eagleoptics.com/index.asp?pid=4833 I still have a 9x Nikon, hardly use it, I use 8x32s even on short trips, and 8x28s are my pocket size in winter.
__________________
humorblog |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
I handled some 8x32 Vortex Fury's the other day at Sportsmans Warehouse. I liked them, very nice. The highest priced Chinese bino on the extensive rack. I definitely liked the views and solid feel/build(particularly the focus wheel) these had over the Nikon Monarch 8x36.....but the Monarchs were lighter with bigger objectives....its all a compromise.
Last edited by orbitaljump : Tuesday 2nd December 2008 at 18:52. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,120
|
I think the Papilo's could make rather good kids bins.
Someone here commented a long time ago that kids (especially younger (elementary/primary school age) look to look at close things as well as distance things. And by close we mean "portable microscope" close. Only down side if toughness and lack of waterproofing. Though I agree with Tero's comments of reverse porros with internal focussing being pretty tough in general these are a little different. They move the objectives to focus on both along the axis and tilt (or move) them relative to the axis (to "toe in" for close up views). So they have largish objects moving in two dimensions which gives more ways to fail ... which I suspect might contribute to the comments of "miscollimation out of the box" I've seen. The Yosemites would be tougher but not as good at close focus. Awaiting a pair to play with ... |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 287
|
Maybe some Nikon 7x35E or Swift Ultralite 7x42 or Swift Audubon 8.5x44 804Rs....instead of spending $200 plus on a roof?
Id like to get them a roof though. I think my sister would like a roof prism bino. Another plus for the Nikon Monarch 8x36...its a name she can recognize and might appreciate more for that simple foolish reason. Last edited by orbitaljump : Wednesday 3rd December 2008 at 00:21. |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| South-West of Ireland April with kids | Visitor | Ireland | 2 | Sunday 6th April 2008 14:21 |
| Kids bird watching for the first time (and in KNP in South Africa) | SpeakerMike | Tips For New Birders | 8 | Friday 20th July 2007 14:52 |
| Binoculars for Kids | morrisos | Binoculars | 9 | Wednesday 21st March 2007 19:57 |
| Hi im from south africa too! | blommetjie | Say Hello | 7 | Tuesday 5th December 2006 11:06 |
| Binoculars for kids? | Otto McDiesel | Binoculars | 8 | Friday 27th October 2006 20:52 |