Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 24th March 2004, 22:48   #1
mickporter
Oswaldtwistle birder
 
mickporter's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Question for Andy or whoever.....

So far I have followed Andy Bright's camera settings on my Nikon 4500 blindly.

I have no intention of questioning the great man, but I more often than not get blurred pictures (not caused by camera shake), I think sometimes it would be good to have a faster shutter speed, which is not possible in Apeture Priority. I suppose I could try Manual Mode, but I am not confident enough to adjust both Apeture and Shutter.

Why should I not use Shutter priority?? Surely with a moving bird (I haven't found one yet that sits still, except for a sleeping owl!) I would have a better chance of less blur with a reasonable shutter speed of at least 1/60??

Andy obviously thinks this is wrong but why??


mickporter is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 24th March 2004, 23:07   #2
Andy Bright
Administrator
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 4,150
Hi Mick, sorry to hear that you're struggling. When you are in aperture priority mode (with aperture set at lowesst f#) the shutter speed shown will be the fastest available for correct exposure of the image. As you say, there's nothing to stop you going into full manual and choosing a faster shutter-speed but the resulting image will be under-exposed....you are governed by the amount of light in getting a fast shutter-speed.

I often use full manual and deliberately under-expose at times (judge exposure by the linear meter on the display) to get the all important faster shutter-speed as you can brighten up the image in-computer to some extent and in any case, a dark but sharper photo is better than a bright blurred one, but in general aperture priority is the best option for newcomers in terms of consistant results. Raising the iso setting is the better option for many to achieve a faster shutter-speed....as is zooming back and not having the subject as large in the frame.
regards,
Andy
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 25th March 2004, 06:11   #3
Jay Turberville
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickporter
Why should I not use Shutter priority?? Surely with a moving bird (I haven't found one yet that sits still, except for a sleeping owl!) I would have a better chance of less blur with a reasonable shutter speed of at least 1/60??

Andy obviously thinks this is wrong but why??
Most digicams have a very limited range of apertures. For instance, at a medium zoom setting, I think the CP4500 has a range from something like f4 to f10 or about three stops. So if you set the camera to a particular shutter speed, the likelihood that there will be a suitable f-number for proper exposure can be rather low depending on what shutter speed you set. To make matters worse, when digiscoping the indicated f-number may not really be the effective f-number.

So Andy is correct. Use aperture priority. If you use a relatively low camera and eyepiece zoom, there should be a fair bit lof light available. But regardless, if you shoot with the camera aperture wide open, you will automatically get the fasted shutter speed that the camera thinks is possible.

I use the +/- control for tweaking exposures. You can always dial in a minus 1 for to force a faster shutter speed at the expense of a somewhat underexposed image. And as Andy says, you can try shooting at ISO 200.
__________________
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Jay Turberville is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another question on moth traps Surreybirder Butterflies and Moths 90 Saturday 3rd April 2004 13:24
SpiderTech adapter question miller.rob Digiscoping Adapters 2 Tuesday 20th January 2004 10:15
Bunting question ArnelGuanlao Bird Identification Q&A 7 Thursday 26th June 2003 17:24
Birdforum and Birds-pix -- a question of netiquette rb_stern Birds & Birding 6 Thursday 1st May 2003 17:23

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.16007209 seconds with 12 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:57.