![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,166
|
Chandler S. Robbins amazing bins
This actually started on this thread but I think it's worth hoisting to the top (for a couple of reasons!).
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?p=1508068 Many thanks Fugolman for IDing these as Chandler Robbins' bins. That's Chandler S. "Golden Guide" Robbins for those that forgot. Like me. Not that I'll forget again! And the Breeding Bird Survey. And Breeding Bird Atlas. Yikes! Amongst others. http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/research/sc...s_Robbins1.pdf Quote:
http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/whatsnew/ev...to_gallery.cfm Like this one http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/whatsnew/ev...s/Robbins2.jpg and more clearly http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/whatsnew/ev...s/Chan2_lg.jpg and perhaps best of all http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/whatsnew/ev...t_IMG22_lg.jpg The photo, taken by Laura Erickson, is in Flicker too in the original size too and the meium I've attached to this post. http://www.flickr.com/photos/4801458...09880/sizes/l/ Anyone care to ID the bins? Laura Erickson took this photo on February 17, 2007 and helpfully placed the original photo on Flickr. High resolution is very useful. It shows some lettering around the inside of the barrels. Pushing the exposure in an image viewer and I can read most of them. The right barrel has " X 50mm" and "7° 10'" (I think) and "FULLY COATED". I think the magnification is "10 X 50mm". It's certainly two characters. The mangled left barrel appears to have "BUSHNELL" and "...TED" which I presume is "COATED" also. So just those mangled letters after bushnell remain unidentified. So a fullly coated Bushnell 10x50mm porro. With quite a wide field for a 10x at more than 7 degrees (you won't see that today ... 6.8° seems to be the largest FOV one can find and that only in the "Top Four"). From the 1960s? 1970s? Any model ID? The closet descendent I can find is the non-waterproof Bushnell Bausch & Lomb 10x50 Legacy Wide Angle Porro Prism Binocular with 7.2° FOV and 9mm ER. No longer sold (and replaced by a more ordinary waterproof Legacy WP). I presume harking back to even earlier Bushnell wide angle porros. The leather armor I presume is an aftermarket addition. Clearly an expert birder using a wide angle 10x bin. Now that's "old school" ![]() Last edited by Kevin Purcell : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 03:41. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: East Kootenay
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Québec
Posts: 59
|
Ha ha ha!
When I looked at the picture in the article (other thread), I laughed. Funny joke. Then I realized that the optics was in good shape. Then I told myself "hey, someone migh actually still use them". Hell, good optics is good optics. I mean I'm still using the Bushnell Audubon 7x26 that are an heritage from my father. He died in 1987... So they are probably over 20 years old and they are still good. Too bad I cannot post picture here. We should make a thread about old binoculars that peoples still use. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,059
|
A question here, if you please, about the left barrel's objective housing. Is it possible it served double duty as a lug wrench?
![]() Bob Last edited by ceasar : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 04:17. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,166
|
I asked Laura Erickson where she took the photo and if she had any more details and she said:
Quote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48014585@N00/3636839653/ I love the camouflage Hawaiian shirt (works well in any tropical environment!) ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/48014585@N00/3636833675/ Bob: it reminded me of a lug wrench too. Though the interesting thing is the housing is messed up but the objective glass is in great condition (see the high res original). I presume these have been repaired a few times. I guess it probably says something about Chandler's generation: born in 1918 and grew up in the depression and then his early 20s in WW2. Make do and mend, as they used to say in the UK (until about 1955). Last edited by Kevin Purcell : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 18:49. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 2,018
|
Looks like a center focus version of the USOL Featherlights seen on Fan Tao's site here:
http://fantao.home.att.net/fpo10x50.htm Do I see part of the word "Feather" inside the mangled left barrel? Last edited by henry link : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 19:08. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,166
|
Quote:
I think you are right. That last piece of text I couldn't read does look like "FEATHER". Just like this photo of a new one. http://fantao.home.att.net/images/bfl10x50o.jpg The bin does match in body shape and the FOV. Though the Eps look different. The spec of the "USOL Version" of the Bushnell Featherlight 10x50 Wide Field Mfr: J-B138, J-E4 Date: circa 1960 AFOV: ~72 degrees TFOV: 7 degrees 10' Eye Relief: ~13mm Prisms: high index Weight: ~970g So at least it has BaK4 prisms! Fan Tao also makes the comment: Quote:
Mystery solved! Those bins are approaching 50 years old. Last edited by Kevin Purcell : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 20:44. |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Basin, Oregon
Posts: 1,427
|
I guess when you achieve his status, nobody is going to say much about your binocular. One of the binoculars my Ornithology professor had way back when was a Bushnell 10x50 that looked pretty much like the fan tao pictures (a lot less like Chandler's).
I wonder if he ever had to get them serviced, or if he had some basic repair skills. Hard to imagine dings like that not doing something to collimation. Hard to imagine a company servicing that without replacing it. If I was him, I'd like to keep it too. Sort of a badge of honor or at least personal trademark. Too bad that binocular can't talk.
__________________
Steve "Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,166
|
Quote:
Quote:
The book is perhaps better known as the "Golden Guide" or "Zim's" which I really don't think gets as much credit as it should nor gives enough credit to Chandler Robbins. I love the sonograms in there. BTW, who are the authors of the National Geographic guide ... ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,059
|
Born in 1918? And still going strong traveling the world!
He is even more remarkable than his binocular! Bob Last edited by ceasar : Thursday 18th June 2009 at 21:49. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 2,018
|
I like this photo of David Bushnell displaying his wares from the very early days. It comes from the binocular images at Peter Abraham's excellent site.
http://www.europa.com/~telscope/binotele.htm There's a very interesting 1999 interview of David Bushnell about the origins and history of the company here: http://www.europa.com/~telscope/bushnell.txt Last edited by henry link : Friday 19th June 2009 at 00:14. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Corvus brachyrhynchos watcher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Posts: 247
|
These look familiar. A Bushnell. Frank Nicollete, the former counter at Hawk Ridge in Duluth, MN (and many places prior to that) i think was using these when i first meet him.
They were replaced when someone got him a pair of Leica 10x50 BA's. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 254
|
The binoculars may not be able to talk, but Chandler Robbins is happy to. I was just in touch with him. He tells me he still uses these binoculars "several times a week" and did not realize they were heavy until he was in his nineties. He still keeps an office at Patuxent WRC.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,166
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Steadiness - Long bins vs. short bins? | APSmith | Binoculars | 16 | Sunday 4th March 2007 02:28 |
| saw something amazing!! JUST now | scuba0095 | Birds Of Prey | 2 | Tuesday 23rd May 2006 07:30 |
| Specific budget, bins vs bins & scope | RobConnel | Binoculars | 38 | Sunday 17th July 2005 16:18 |
| Amazing! | D T Lakeman | Say Hello | 15 | Tuesday 16th November 2004 11:58 |
| I've Just Seen Something Amazing! | GrahamR | Birds & Birding | 5 | Tuesday 3rd August 2004 18:29 |