Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 27th December 2002, 21:44   #1
Steve
Registered user

 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Uk
Posts: 31
Equipment

So what Equipment do members use? and is it like all things: you get what you pay for??? is it all preference,or is there the holy grail of Bins or scopes for birding?

Steve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 27th December 2002, 21:56   #2
Colin
Axeman (Retired)
 
Colin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In a Shed in a Quarry in Gloucestershire (UK)
Posts: 2,000
Blog Entries: 29
Binnies - Nikon HG are the absolute best but v expensive unless you can do a deal.

Scopes - Kowa 823/824 are the best value for money of all time.

Leica binnies are good optically but the engineering of the focussing wheel with the 'slack' in it make them awful. Many £99.00 binnies have smoother focussing mechanisms.

Swarovski - far too expensive in terms of value for money. The scopes in my opinion for over £1000 are terrible.

Having now upset nearly all the members of this forum one way or another, may I say that each has unique eyes and what may suit one will not suit another so be gentle with me. However, the sloppy focussing wheel of the Leica is nothing to do with eyesight, its just poor engineering.

There is another brand of binnies, sold in WWT shops for £1.99. The spec is 4x16 and although the image leaves a lot to be desired, they must rate as one of the best value for money of all time for binnies. Surely a £600 pair of binnies cannot be 300 times better than the £1.99 ones. (100x better, yes, but not 300x).



*Colin retreats and puts tin hat on*


Controversial Colin
__________________
Colin
Colin is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 27th December 2002, 22:30   #3
tafflad
Registered User
 
tafflad's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ammanford WALES , UK
Posts: 18
What a very good topic , and one that will be very , very informative for others such as myself . To know what other , more experienced people use , can only be of benefit to the less knowledgeable of us . Personally , I use a Kowa 823 scope c/w 20-60 zoom , and a well used pair of swift 8 X 40 bins , both incidentally chosen by virtue of being bargain buys , and not through any prior knowledge .
Cheers Hugh
tafflad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 27th December 2002, 23:21   #4
monkeyman
Aviate. Navigate. Communicate.
 
monkeyman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 655
As a freelance designer, I have to make every penny count. I'd love to spend a coupla grand on really good equipment, but can' t justify that. So, we've got two pairs of Jessop's bins (pocket size) which we got for less than 60 pounds sterling (the pair) and cos I can't aford a Swar or a Leca, just bought the Tasco 15-45x scope which really surprised me with its image quality! Only drawbacks are a very (!) narrow depth of field and light weight (vibration in the wind).

But then again, pencils and paper are a lot cheaper! And that's MY forte!

Well, apart from Photoshop! (and that's even more expesive!)



ps. It's what you get out of birding that counts, not how much you spend!!!!!!
__________________
Aquila non capit muscas
monkeyman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 28th December 2002, 23:32   #5
marcus
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 939
Monkeyman, that is soooooo true!!!!
I just bought a new pair yesterday on my lunch break, the Nikon Sporter I 10x36. It wasn't too expensive, $209.99 (what's that in pounds?). Have any of you birders ever looked through one?
I hope that this spring I'll see some lifer through it.
Oh, by the way, I don't see a key for the pound sign on this Gateway keyboard.
marcus
__________________
Marcus
marcus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 29th December 2002, 08:38   #6
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 40,127
I agree with the sentiments on cost of equipment. I know what I'd like to have but rarely can I afford it.
I have made do with various pairs of binoculars over thirty years of birdwatching and have found my self replacing them every few years. Most had decent optics setting out (or so I thought) but even looking after them very carefully, the image deteriorates or more likely my eyesight !
I picked up a pair of Leica 8x32's secondhand a couple of months back and to be honest the image quality is just so much better, clearer, more defined, greater depth of field, larger viewable image for spectacle wearers ....
I honestly believe that if I had splashed out on a pair several years ago, I would have probably saved money in the long run !
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 29th December 2002, 21:12   #7
alan_rymer
Registered User
 
alan_rymer's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,054
I only got into fairly serious birding this spring. I have been using a pair of Sirius 10x25's which optically seem quite reasonable to me and invested in 3 pairs of 8(GBP) cheapies from 7sayshop.co.uk which I keep in the car and jacket pockets ( its better having a cheap pair with you than none at all! ), but at age 54 with eyes that go with the age a new pair of bins will soon be required.
As a first scope I bought an Opticron MM2 with a 25x eyepiece and a Velbon 444 tripod, both are at the lightest ( probably about 2.5lb the pair) and cheapest end of the market. I wanted to get into digiscoping at sometime so I have treated myself to a new scope this week, Opticron ES80 HD with a 32x HDF eyepiece, its so much better that the MM2. However, its so much heavier and the Velbon 444 is not up to scratch, so need a better tripod!. I have an old digital camera ( 640x480 ) no zoom and now see why a Zoom camera is required!. Photo's without zoom are O.K. upto about 20-30 foot, after that things get a little difficult, so, also a new camera required!. Maybe next Christmas.
And I thought fishing was expensive!.

Maybe I should just sit and vegitate, in the warm and dry watching the birdies on the feeders, with a good book on my lap and a Sherry at my elbow ( or maybe the other way round )!.

Hope the weathers better where you are. Wet, Wet, Wet, flooded and even more wet here!.

Anyway, I hope the fat man in the red suit brought you what you desired.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!.
It just looks like it!.
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 29th December 2002, 21:41   #8
Gaye Horn

 
Posts: n/a
WE have Bushnell Bins times 2 and a pocket size pair as well. I also have a pair of Nikon bins..(left in a will to me) and Busnell scope...a friend has the new Swar scope and wow .. but the price is here in Canada to be bled for... no way unless we win the lotto.
We have great cameras, good lens, and super accessories.. but that is that... we like what we have and have had them for years now.. it works for our eyes and frankly Lee has the BEST eye sight of any living mortal ,so most times I do not even have to search.. he finds 'em and I point that direction!!!
Expensive does not always mean better... it sometimes just means that person spent more...
I say whatever works is good enough for me...and as long as you derive enjoyment from that which you have.. then it is all a moot point.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 2nd January 2003, 20:04   #9
wizard
Registered User
 
wizard's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Wales
Posts: 233
Get a good pair to last

For years i used a great pair of 10x50 Pentax, they did the job but i was restricted & living in Sunny Wales waterproof bins is a must, Pentax were not!.
I tried a mates Leica 8x32 and they were good but only trying them for a a few mins you cant really tell.
Before Xmas i got a pair of 8-12x42 Leica and to be very honest here, they are outstanding, used them fist coming upto dusk and looking at a post which was dark on my side looking with the naked eye, with the Duovid's it was like daylight not dusk. the only down side is the weight but this is similar to what i am used to so it just about evens out.
i was told you only get what you pay for and with the Leica this seems to be the case, would i pay the price again...... Yes but only if your really into your birding.
now i am looking for a scope but after reading all the reports on makes, you really have to make up your own mind so i will be looking around all this year for a good pair before i spend any cash.

only advise i can give is speak to people who have them & get first had advise, shops will always tell you "this is best or that is best" make up your own mind then go for it.

hope this helps not makes matters worse:-(
__________________

wizard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 2nd January 2003, 20:52   #10
Andy Bright
2nd in command
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 6,485
Get the best and they should last a lifetime....that's where the money goes, build quality and after sales service!
I've heard amazing stories of how far Swarovski go to keep their customers happy.... givng replacement equipment whilst they send off the sick optics off to Austria, often free of any charge....even if you did something stupid!

How these scopes and binos feel in use is vital, optically they are often similar at the top end.... so weight and comfort over extended periods of use becomes the deciding factor in many cases.

My own opinion is that Swarovski are currently producing the best sporting optics. The EL range of binos (I have 10x42) only have the Nikon HG's as serious competition to my eyes, and the HG's seemed very heavy and bulky to me. I thought the Leica BN's were best for colour though.....so it depends on your priorities (brightness, contrast, colour or sharpness).
Consequently, I prefer the Swarovski 80HD scopes, but this is down to optical quality more than a friendly design (never liked the sharp edges on them, new ATS is more cuddly!). Kowa 823/4 would be my next choice.... great value.
Andy B
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 9th January 2003, 19:27   #11
Steve Gross
Registered User
 
Steve Gross's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 275
I own the following optics:

Binocs:

Pentax DCF WP 8x42 - waterproof, phase-corrected, roof prisms.
I love 'em and am still astonished from time to time with the bright, clear image. A friend bought a pair of these, but their eyecups kept sliding back down. He gave them to his wife and bought a pair of Nikon Venturers (8x). These are $1000+ binocs (the Nikons). I had him try my Pentaxes, which do not have the sliding eyecup problem, and he said that if his were like mine (and a return to the seller for a replacement would have accomplished this), he never would have gotten the Nikons. After rebate, he got the Pentaxes for less than $200!!!!!

Backup binocs: Nikon Action series 7x35. Good to keep in the car, and a very wide field of view (good for beginning birders, IMHO).

Scope: Eagle Optics Raven 78mm, w/20-60x zoom eyepiece. I've posted in another forum about this scope, and would only change out the eyepiece for a 30x wide-angle (which hopefully will come out from Eagle Optics).

Tripod: Bogen (Manfrotto) 3021, with Bogen 3130 fluid head. Works like a charm.

I'm pretty pleased with my setup, especially considering my budget (I'm a teacher). I shopped for a long time and read everything I could get my hands on before deciding on binocs or scope.
__________________
Steve in Houston
Steve Gross is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 9th January 2003, 20:41   #12
Geoff Pain
Rural Member
 
Geoff Pain's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stackhouse,North Yorkshire
Posts: 1,660
My equipment is as follows
Bins Leica 8x32BA

Scope Swarovski AT80HD,20-60 zoom eyepiece

Tripod Velbron Delta with a Manfrotto 128RC mini video fluid head

The only item that I may upgrade would be the tripod,but not the head,as for everything else I'm hoping it will see me out the rest of my days.


Geoff
__________________
Geoff

In order to see birds it is necessary to become part of the silence. Robert Lynd
Geoff Pain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 9th January 2003, 21:24   #13
peter hayes

 
Posts: n/a
Geoff


Which tripod would you upgrade to? And have you a digital camera?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 11th January 2003, 22:51   #14
Geoff Pain
Rural Member
 
Geoff Pain's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stackhouse,North Yorkshire
Posts: 1,660
Yes I do have a digital camera Peter,a Nikon CP995.I don't really know which tripod I would upgrade to,I've not given it a lot of though,any suggestions anybody?
__________________
Geoff

In order to see birds it is necessary to become part of the silence. Robert Lynd
Geoff Pain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 11th January 2003, 23:05   #15
peter hayes

 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Geoff.

How would compare the 4500 with the 995? And what about the 5700? Any thoughts?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 11th January 2003, 23:35   #16
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
Peter: If you can get hold of the November issue of Bird Watching, they did a side-by-side comparison of the 4500 and the 995. If you can't get it I can scan it and send you a copy if you like. My digiscoping acquaintance uses the 4500 and he gets some great photos, which he gets developed at Asda, as he doesn't have a computer. The article in BW puts the 995 at the top. I'm still confused as I'm getting quite mixed results with the 995, but as I've stated before, this could be the camera's focus at fault. Unless I'm just expecting too much perfection.

Geoff: I recently upgraded my Manfrotto 190 tripod to the 443 carbon-fibre. I kept the 128RC head though. It's quite a bit lighter and is very stable, although I haven't been out in any strong winds yet. It really does absorb the movement quickly. I tested it in the shop by taking my scope and camera and setting it all up on the tripod. Looking through the camera monitor, I touched the tripod leg and watched how long it took for the image to stabilise. The proof of the pudding is in my recent photos, some of which I've put in the Gallery. These were taken in a packed hide, with people moving and coming in and out. With my other Manfrotto, I had loads of shots from hides that were clearly spoiled due to camera shake - and I thought I'd waited for everyone to stop moving.

Diane.
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 12th January 2003, 13:55   #17
ralph
Old Hand
 
ralph's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tenby
Posts: 322
Well,

Bins: Leica 8x42BN (Green Ones)
Digital Camera: Nikon Coolpix 775 (Biggest Mistake EVER)
Scope: Some unidentifiable Greenkat job, extremely old, extremely rubbish!

And yes Al - Photoshop prices are extortionate. Version 7 has just crippled my business!
__________________
"Help! She's touching my special area!"
ralph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 12th January 2003, 16:48   #18
Doug
Registered User
 
Doug's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 612
For a cost effective alternative to Photoshop try Adobe Photoshop Elements - It has done everything I have needed and is under £100.
__________________
Which way is up?
Doug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 12th January 2003, 17:04   #19
ralph
Old Hand
 
ralph's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tenby
Posts: 322
Thanks Doug,

Got Photoshop Elements 2 bundled with Photoshop 7. It's still sitting in the box unused, and I expect that's where it will stay, unless there's something on there that Photoshop can't do (which is highly unlikely).
__________________
"Help! She's touching my special area!"
ralph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 12th January 2003, 22:36   #20
peter hayes

 
Posts: n/a
digi-birder

Thanks very much for that advice. I'll take a look at the mag to see how they compare the two models.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 12th January 2003, 22:57   #21
Vogelman
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, Texas USA
Posts: 227
Digital Cameras:

Canon D60 w 70-200 F4L (Looking for longer lens maybe Canon 100-400 F 5.6 L or Sigma 50-500 EX), Nikon Coolpix 700 (No Good for Birding as no zoom)

Binocs:

Nikon 7 x 21 7.1 (Circa 1980) I would really like to get a new pair with a little more power though I would keep these as they are nice and compact and still work like new. I have looked at the Canon 10 x 40? IS model and was impressed with how well the IS worked and the apparent value (<$400 US). Anybody have any experience with IS binocs? From my test at the store I think I might even be able to go for a higher power with the IS, but am not sure I would care for the extra weight and really need the extra power.

Vogelman
Vogelman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 13th January 2003, 05:14   #22
bcurrie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 979
Vogelman, I have used the Canon IS binocs. The image stabilization is very good. However, for a 10 X 40 they are pricey. The IS is really only needed if you go out on boats frequently (which is where I tried mine, and it was fantastic). If you do not go out on pelagic trips, you will find that you rarely will use the IS. I don't think a higher power is made with the IS, is it?
__________________
Brian
bcurrie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 13th January 2003, 19:30   #23
Andy Bright
2nd in command
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 6,485
I've tried the Canon IS 15X50 and wasn't impressed with the optical performance compared with the typical high-end binos (way behind my 10x42 Swaro' EL), probably fair enough as much of the price goes into the IS system (and very clever it is too). They are heavy and not comfortable in my hands.....maybe better for others.
I.S. was good....slight feeling that you are on a boat with a gentle swell underneath... don't have a heavy breakfast before extended use?
Andy B
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 23rd January 2003, 23:17   #24
andyb
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: peterborough
Posts: 9
(my first post)
bins - swift audubon 8.5 x 44 - newer waterproof ones
My first pair of 'serious' bins. I'd been using some old and appallingly bad Tasco zoom bins before then. They were well past their best too. Optics way out of alignment and the images were different sizes through each eyepiece. Friends were amazed I could see anything at all through them but it's surprising what you can get used to! I absolutely love the swift bins ...

scope - opticron es80 with hdf zoom eyepiece
My first scope. I saved for ages and I haven't had it long but it's transformed my birdwatching. I don't use the maximum zoom very much though because the field of view gets very small and quite dark unless conditions are perfect.

tripod - velbon delta
A tripod - had no problems with it really. The coating on the legs seems to get scratched quite easily but then I'm a bit of an 'off-road' birder :)

andyb (another one)
andyb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 23rd January 2003, 23:28   #25
wizard
Registered User
 
wizard's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Wales
Posts: 233
Wink

Hi andyb

glad to hear your getting on with your new optics. i too am a bit of an off roader. scrabling through brambles & the like is the norm for me. or spending hours in a forrest. all good fun though.
i am saving for a scope next or it could be a lap top which would be handy to log all my data. scope i think first though

just had a pair of Leica duovid and they are out standing.

welcome to the forum
__________________

wizard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.22156906 seconds with 30 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:31.