Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 16:05   #1
spacepilot
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
How does Zen ED2 work in the rain?

I use the 8x42 Leupold Cascades porros when it's wet out, and leave my Nikon SE's home. Besides the narrow FOV, the biggest downside of the Cascades is that it doesn't have the water-repellent coating. Since I enjoy going out in the rain a lot, I've been trying to justify an upgrade of my rainy-day bins. The Zen ED2 (haven't decided on 7x or 8x) seems a very good candidate. Wide FOV, and water-repellent coating. I just wonder how does the water-repellent coating actually works in the field. Does it shed raindrops as well as the coatings on the more expensive bins? If it doesn't work well, I may try the Meostar or Nikon LX instead, as their flat field and edge sharpness may be closer to the views of the Nikon SE's than the ED2's. Thanks.

Ning


spacepilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 16:08   #2
kristoffer
Used Register
 
kristoffer's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,705
Blog Entries: 2
I am probably quite capable answering your question. I have soaked my ED2 three times last weeks, it rains so much here at the moment. However I have never used any other bin with water-fobic coatings so I have nothing to compare with. They work well in the rain but I never get water on the objective, only oculars. I bring some soft paper with me to wipe them off. I could never have a non-waterproof bin, the rain always surprises me.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spacepilot View Post
I use the 8x42 Leupold Cascades porros when it's wet out, and leave my Nikon SE's home. Besides the narrow FOV, the biggest downside of the Cascades is that it doesn't have the water-repellent coating. Since I enjoy going out in the rain a lot, I've been trying to justify an upgrade of my rainy-day bins. The Zen ED2 (haven't decided on 7x or 8x) seems a very good candidate. Wide FOV, and water-repellent coating. I just wonder how does the water-repellent coating actually works in the field. Does it shed raindrops as well as the coatings on the more expensive bins? If it doesn't work well, I may try the Meostar or Nikon LX instead, as their flat field and edge sharpness may be closer to the views of the Nikon SE's than the ED2's. Thanks.

Ning
__________________
"It's either death or whisky"
kristoffer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 16:23   #3
spacepilot
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by kristoffer View Post
I am probably quite capable answering your question. I have soaked my ED2 three times last weeks, it rains so much here at the moment. However I have never used any other bin with water-fobic coatings so I have nothing to compare with. They work well in the rain but I never get water on the objective, only oculars. I bring some soft paper with me to wipe them off. I could never have a non-waterproof bin, the rain always surprises me.
Thanks, kristoffer. I usually get rain on both the ocular and objective lenses . So you still need to wipe the lenses with tissue to soak up the water. Hmm, that's what I do now and what I had hoped to be able to avoid with the water-repellent coating.

Ning
spacepilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 16:35   #4
kristoffer
Used Register
 
kristoffer's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,705
Blog Entries: 2
Yes, the ocular, that you look through, do need to be wiped of. Is the anti-water coatings on the more expensive bins that effective? As in no need to wipe them of. Would be a great feature then, i often get soaked.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacepilot View Post
Thanks, kristoffer. I usually get rain on both the ocular and objective lenses . So you still need to wipe the lenses with tissue to soak up the water. Hmm, that's what I do now and what I had hoped to be able to avoid with the water-repellent coating.

Ning
__________________
"It's either death or whisky"
kristoffer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 16:45   #5
spacepilot
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by kristoffer View Post
Yes, the ocular, that you look through, do need to be wiped of. Is the anti-water coatings on the more expensive bins that effective? As in no need to wipe them of. Would be a great feature then, i often get soaked.
I have no idea how well LotuTec or AquaDura or whatever works. But come to think about it, I probably wouldn't expect that either. I apply RainX on the windshield of my car. Big raindrops bead up and roll right off, but small drops stays on and I have to use windshield wiper. I suspect all the water-repellent coatings on bins probably don't work much better than that. I probably got caught up on the notion and had my expectation too high.

Ning
spacepilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 19:28   #6
falcondude
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 664
When I browsed through the Bushnell brochure. Their explanation for water replellant is to break large water running on the surface into smaller droplets. I doubt there is anything available to keep lens dry all the time. I could be wrong though. I used my ED2 in light drizzles a couple of times. They worked fine.
falcondude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 23rd November 2009, 22:38   #7
Alexis Powell
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Posts: 1,699
I've used my Swarovski 8x32 EL (with "Swaroclean") in the rain a few times. I just flick my wrist and the water is ejected fairly effectively, with no need for wiping to allow a usable view. Maybe fine mist wouldn't accumulate enough to generate the critical mass/volume of water that is necessary for that technique to work? I don't have enough experience yet to say more.

--AP

Last edited by Alexis Powell : Monday 23rd November 2009 at 22:41.
Alexis Powell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 24th November 2009, 01:13   #8
Steve C
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Basin, Oregon
Posts: 2,386
The repellent coated Promaster ELX ED and the ZEN ED 2 both repel water better than the original ZEN ED. I can't say I see much difference in the Promaster and the ED 2. Both tend to break the droplets up into much finer particles, which seem to move to the outer edges of the lens, and seem to give the effect of there being much less water on the lens. I suppose Alexis's technique of flinging the water off the lens might work with the ZEN, but I did not get into much rain yet with mine and have yet to see enough water to try that. Additionally, I nearly always use the ocular covers anyway and try to minimize water on the lens in the first place. But we all know that when there is enough water to foul up the image, it will be at the worst possible time.
__________________
Steve

"Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt.
Steve C is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Tuesday 24th November 2009, 01:54   #9
dalat
Registered User
 
dalat's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 780
Can't say anything about Zen, only about the water repellent coating in my Leica Ultravid. I can see some difference in rain compared to bins without that coating, eg. drops can be blown off more easily. But to me the coating does not solve the problem completely, eg. blowing off works, but then the lense is condensed for a while. So I still use rainguard and try to avoid drops getting on the ocular at the first place. To me, the main advantage of water repellent coating is the much more easy cleaning of the lenses, and not really a better behaviour in rain.
dalat is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 24th November 2009, 16:47   #10
spacepilot
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
Thanks everyone for your input. I read a little more about the water-repellent coatings from various manufacturers. Like you said, it seems that their main advertised benefit is easy cleaning. Clearer viewing in the rain is mostly a side-effect.

Ning
spacepilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Zen-Ray ED2 AhmedBow Zen Ray 13 Saturday 21st November 2009 18:50
Need new strap for Zen Ed2 kristoffer Zen Ray 7 Monday 14th September 2009 10:27
Zen ED2 7X36 available on ZEN Ray for pre order mannukiddo Zen Ray 198 Tuesday 1st September 2009 20:45
7x36 Zen ED2 Sold out...But how many ? gcole Others 1 Sunday 16th August 2009 01:49


Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.14814806 seconds with 19 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38.