|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
|
How does Zen ED2 work in the rain?
I use the 8x42 Leupold Cascades porros when it's wet out, and leave my Nikon SE's home. Besides the narrow FOV, the biggest downside of the Cascades is that it doesn't have the water-repellent coating. Since I enjoy going out in the rain a lot, I've been trying to justify an upgrade of my rainy-day bins. The Zen ED2 (haven't decided on 7x or 8x) seems a very good candidate. Wide FOV, and water-repellent coating. I just wonder how does the water-repellent coating actually works in the field. Does it shed raindrops as well as the coatings on the more expensive bins? If it doesn't work well, I may try the Meostar or Nikon LX instead, as their flat field and edge sharpness may be closer to the views of the Nikon SE's than the ED2's. Thanks.
Ning |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Used Register
|
I am probably quite capable answering your question. I have soaked my ED2 three times last weeks, it rains so much here at the moment. However I have never used any other bin with water-fobic coatings so I have nothing to compare with. They work well in the rain but I never get water on the objective, only oculars. I bring some soft paper with me to wipe them off. I could never have a non-waterproof bin, the rain always surprises me.
Quote:
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
. So you still need to wipe the lenses with tissue to soak up the water. Hmm, that's what I do now and what I had hoped to be able to avoid with the water-repellent coating. Ning |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Used Register
|
Yes, the ocular, that you look through, do need to be wiped of. Is the anti-water coatings on the more expensive bins that effective? As in no need to wipe them of. Would be a great feature then, i often get soaked.
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
Ning |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 664
|
When I browsed through the Bushnell brochure. Their explanation for water replellant is to break large water running on the surface into smaller droplets. I doubt there is anything available to keep lens dry all the time. I could be wrong though. I used my ED2 in light drizzles a couple of times. They worked fine.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Posts: 1,699
|
I've used my Swarovski 8x32 EL (with "Swaroclean") in the rain a few times. I just flick my wrist and the water is ejected fairly effectively, with no need for wiping to allow a usable view. Maybe fine mist wouldn't accumulate enough to generate the critical mass/volume of water that is necessary for that technique to work? I don't have enough experience yet to say more.
--AP Last edited by Alexis Powell : Monday 23rd November 2009 at 22:41. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Basin, Oregon
Posts: 2,386
|
The repellent coated Promaster ELX ED and the ZEN ED 2 both repel water better than the original ZEN ED. I can't say I see much difference in the Promaster and the ED 2. Both tend to break the droplets up into much finer particles, which seem to move to the outer edges of the lens, and seem to give the effect of there being much less water on the lens. I suppose Alexis's technique of flinging the water off the lens might work with the ZEN, but I did not get into much rain yet with mine and have yet to see enough water to try that. Additionally, I nearly always use the ocular covers anyway and try to minimize water on the lens in the first place. But we all know that when there is enough water to foul up the image, it will be at the worst possible time.
__________________
Steve "Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
|
Can't say anything about Zen, only about the water repellent coating in my Leica Ultravid. I can see some difference in rain compared to bins without that coating, eg. drops can be blown off more easily. But to me the coating does not solve the problem completely, eg. blowing off works, but then the lense is condensed for a while. So I still use rainguard and try to avoid drops getting on the ocular at the first place. To me, the main advantage of water repellent coating is the much more easy cleaning of the lenses, and not really a better behaviour in rain.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 692
|
Thanks everyone for your input. I read a little more about the water-repellent coatings from various manufacturers. Like you said, it seems that their main advertised benefit is easy cleaning. Clearer viewing in the rain is mostly a side-effect.
Ning |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Zen-Ray ED2 | AhmedBow | Zen Ray | 13 | Saturday 21st November 2009 18:50 |
| Need new strap for Zen Ed2 | kristoffer | Zen Ray | 7 | Monday 14th September 2009 10:27 |
| Zen ED2 7X36 available on ZEN Ray for pre order | mannukiddo | Zen Ray | 198 | Tuesday 1st September 2009 20:45 |
| 7x36 Zen ED2 Sold out...But how many ? | gcole | Others | 1 | Sunday 16th August 2009 01:49 |