|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 30
|
Most underrated binocular....
+
After a month of testing different bins, from the current crop of Chinese ED glass, Monarchs & other roofs, even several porros, I finally found my bins..... I live 2 hours NE of Eagle Optics in Middleton, so I drove down last weekend to find my binoculars. Mike at EO was very open to me and he didn't push any binocular, he asked what I'v used and approx. price range. I told him I owned Zen-Ray ED2s and tried some Nikons, we started to look. After a while of testing CA in various binoculars, I told Mike I was looking for really good build quality, he pulled down a pair of Vortex Vipers (I actually wouldn't have looked at them) oh my!!! * Put it this way,...take the size of Monarchs, the ED glass of Zen-Ray and wrap that in absolutely fantastic Japanese build quality {yes they are actually made in Japan}, you have the Vortex Vipers The Vipers have stellar clarity w/ ED glass & the FOV seems much larger in actual use. Focus is fast, but not so fast as to overshoot your view, true pleasure. What's most amazing to me, that Vipers are not talked about more, maybe people don't want to let the secret out . I was able to get a verrrry good price being there in person ...thanks Mike Last edited by collinvue : Wednesday 20th January 2010 at 19:10. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Used Register
|
they are great. But they show plenty of ca and zr ed2 or zeiss fl got way better glass. I have owned all three.
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
postmodern birder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Washington D.C. area (formerly MA)
Posts: 5,711
|
Quote:
Cheers, Jim
__________________
Please report your bird sightings to eBird (http://ebird.org/content/ebird/about)! Last edited by J. Moore : Wednesday 20th January 2010 at 14:43. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Used Register
|
Both the Viper and Old EL show CA, the chinese EDs does not. If you are used to the EL and is non sensitive to CA , the Viper probably looked good. But they showed too much CA for me, and the ED2/FL is really a step forward in optics evolution.
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Used Register
|
I have not heard about this. Interesting, so new glass in this new Viper?
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 333
|
I tried a pair of Vipers when I was looking at a quality pair of binoculars and was quite impressed. At the time there was a lot of talk about this new bino and it's excellent performance.
In the end the specs and real life performance were very good, but nothing outstanding jumped out. For the price these were nice. I think the 8x were selling for around $425 at the time ( if I remember correctly). Currently the same 8x are pushing $539. This is probably why many have lost interest. I want to ask what warranted the $100+ price increase. I know they got a lot of praise... maybe EO figured they were worth more? If I'm wrong about my memory of pricing please chime in. In the end I came to purchase a Meopta 7x42 (a demo model at a good discount) These had a build quality, FOV, and performance I could not ignore and bought them. There was a big difference between these and the Vipers. Kind of the difference of an Alpha and a viper. The Vipers are no slouch and if I had bought them at the time I'd still be using them. But... once I got a taste of a very wide, flat field (Meopta) I couldn't go back. Cheers Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Just Need One More Pair
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 566
|
I tried Viper and can easily pick up the CA when I looked for it. It is not a big issue for me. But at that time, I was looking for a 7x or 8x and was not too thrilled with the narrow FOV (340ft for 8x). In the end, I got an ED2 7x36. As Oleaf says, $500+ price tag set it back a little. There are some better options out there well below that.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
postmodern birder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Washington D.C. area (formerly MA)
Posts: 5,711
|
347 feet to be exact, which is pretty typical for an 8x42 roof prism. For any 8x42 under $1000 you can get a wider field of view but generally have to add weight and decrease eye relief. The viper is best for those who place a priority on the latter two features. The 5.1 ft close focus is also worth mentioning.
Best, Jim
__________________
Please report your bird sightings to eBird (http://ebird.org/content/ebird/about)! Last edited by J. Moore : Wednesday 20th January 2010 at 16:24. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Used Register
|
I like the handling of the Viper, but not the glass. I donīt like the handling of the ED2, but I like the glass. I like the handling, and the glass of the FL. Only problem was is the price
![]()
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
I agree... the FOV is pretty typical for a mid priced 8x. Same with the build and all other specs. Pretty typical. Good typical 8x run from $275 to $395 currently. So maybe at $500+ it's playing a little out of it's field? No dig... good binocular. I'm sure you've put yours to good use in the field. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 937
|
For what it's worth, I have yet to see ANY bin that has NO CA. The Zens have it. Zeiss FL has it too. I am quite sensitive to it however. I remember trying polycarbonate ("high index") eyeglass lenses once and absolutely couldn't stand them. The whole world fringed out with CA. It was like looking through a fishbowl. My eyes watered for two weeks and then I took them back. The Optometrist tried to tell me something like only 1 or 2 percent of users even notice! I said you'd have to be blind not to notice--but then again . . . clearly many don't.
And now, back to the thread . . . |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Used Register
|
Must be hard to have your eyes. The viper showed alot of CA to me, I canīt see any in the ED2 or FL. And I have perfect eyesight, but not perfect for CA detection then
![]() Quote:
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
I'm a very particular person, if something bugs me even a little, I either fix it or eliminate it. If there were alot of ca on these, there's no way I'd invest in them, period. .....it's that minimal on the latest versions of the Vipers. see post #4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Used Register
|
Ok cool. Vipers without CA would be very nice bins. I really liked my Vipers, except the CA. Nice focus wheel and great handling.
__________________
"It's either death or whisky" |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Conversion of a 7x50 binocular to an 18x90 binocular | birdbrain8 | Binoculars | 1 | Saturday 31st January 2009 15:47 |
| Binocular | raniameid | Binoculars | 3 | Friday 15th August 2008 19:58 |
| Can a Non-Fluorite lens binocular compete with a Fluorite lens binocular? | denco@comcast.n | Binoculars | 48 | Sunday 18th November 2007 19:25 |
| Diafuns Are Underrated!!! | angelo225544 | Zeiss | 3 | Tuesday 31st January 2006 16:50 |
| What is the most underrated bird? | pduxon | Birds & Birding | 69 | Friday 6th August 2004 08:25 |