Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 11:45   #1
roypotter
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hasketon
Posts: 9
100 - 400IS with 1:4 converter

Has anyone used a 1:4 canon converter with the 100-400IS lens & a 10D ?
Does the lens still auto focus ?
How great is the light & image quality loss ?
Any advice / guidance appreciated as I'm considering adding the converter to the armoury but am unsure of the capabilities regarding lower light levels or faster shutter speeds.

Roy

roypotter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 11:49   #2
CJW
Grumpy Git
 
CJW's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,618
Hello Roy and welcome to Bird Forum from all the Moderators and Admin. Staff
A mate of mine (peteh) is a member on here and I know he has used that combo on his 10D. With any luck, he'll be on sometime today to help you with your query.
__________________
Chris
Isle of Man Birding
CJW is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 12:09   #3
roypotter
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hasketon
Posts: 9
Thumbs up

Thanks for that Chris.
Will look out for him


roy
roypotter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 12:20   #4
CJW
Grumpy Git
 
CJW's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,618
In the meantime, have a look at his photos on the Gallery:

http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...500&ppuser=826
__________________
Chris
Isle of Man Birding
CJW is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 12:30   #5
Steve G
RAINBIRDER
 
Steve G's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: FIFE, SCOTLAND
Posts: 6,949
Hi Roy,
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the 10D will not autofocus with apertures smaller than f5.6. The 100-400 lens has has a 4.5-5.6 smallest aperture & will lose a further 1 stop of light with a 1.4 convertor >effectively becoming f8 when extended to 400mm & fitted with the convertor so it will not autofocus. The image stabilisation, etc will work however & there is next to no drop in image quality.
Regards,
Steve
Steve G is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 13:27   #6
peteh
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 748
Hello Roy,

I have the 1.4TC autofocusing on the 100-400L IS by just doing the "sellotape trick".
Its no big deal just a matter of putting ordinary sellotape over 3 pins, its really easy and it doesnt damage the camera or lens.
The autofocus does hunt for a second or two in the not perfect light conditions but it still works which is the most important thing. Ive used the 1.4TC with autofocus on to take photos of birds in flight so its certainly not slow in picking things up.
Its definately worth have a TC in your armoury, theres always times when birds are further away than you want.
I would say though, if your wanting really sharp shots with the TC then the camera definately needs to be on a tripod.

Hope that helps
Pete.
peteh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 13:38   #7
roypotter
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hasketon
Posts: 9
Hi Pete,

Thanks for the info, it sounds like a 1:4TC is a good addition & will be perfectly usable in most conditions.I've heard of the taping trick but could you explain which pins to tape & are they on the lens or converter ?
I'm of to trawl the net for a S/H 1:4 now !

Roy
roypotter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st May 2004, 13:45   #8
peteh
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 748
I followed the advice on this link.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/TipsPage/

Tip 1 it is.

Regards
Pete.
peteh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 22nd May 2004, 17:55   #9
christineredgate
Winner of the Copeland Wildlife Photographer Of The Year Comp-2009
 
christineredgate's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Haverigg,South Cumbria
Posts: 23,064
Roy,thankyou for asking the question and Pete,thankyou for the link.I had seen this info earlier,but did not want to look a com plete idiot by asking what sort of tape,or where one put it,but have copied the image.
__________________
Haverigg.com

Ride Free,Fly Free.
Avatar by Tracker(Tom)
Christine
christineredgate is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 22nd May 2004, 18:49   #10
Charlie M
Registered User
 
Charlie M's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wilts, UK
Posts: 294
Hi,
I p/exed an old style 1.4x T/C for a new version 2x and to be honest really wish I hadn't. There was virtually no image loss with the 1.4x (used with the Canon 300D and 100-400IS), but can I get a sharp shot with the 2x - not so far, and I doubt I will. Everything just softens up and doesn't look "real". If my pride doesn't get in the way, I guess I'm going to have to swallow the cash loss and try to p/ex the "new" for "old" again...(I should have come to BF for advice first!)
Charlie M is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 22nd May 2004, 21:40   #11
peteh
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 748
Im sure getting a sharp shot with a 2x TC can be done. Just that you would have to work extra hard on stopping the vibrations. Like using a tripod, remote, probably mirror lock up etc etc.
Ive seen in Steve Young's books he sometimes stacks TCs! and still gets sharp shots.
peteh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 23rd May 2004, 07:18   #12
LzyPhotographer
Registered User
 
LzyPhotographer's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 936
You can get sharp images with the 2x TC... *IF* you're in really bright light and use a tripod and don't breathe!
__________________
My latest project: www.RedRockAudubon.org
LazyPhotographer: One who uses a telephoto lens to shoot pictures out the car window or from a balcony
LzyPhotographer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 23rd May 2004, 09:11   #13
Charlie M
Registered User
 
Charlie M's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wilts, UK
Posts: 294
To not breathing, using a tripod and a remote release, only using it in bright light (all of which I've tried) I would add - only photograph when there is no air pollution, no haze, no high contrast, no movement of anything (including the earth's spin), your circadian rhythm is just right to release your inner "Steve Young", and the world is your best friend between the shutter opening and the shutter closing: like I said, not impossible, just that I doubt I'll ever get the perfect alignment of mental state and the planets that I need...:))
Charlie M is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 23rd May 2004, 09:32   #14
Andy Bright
2nd in command
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 6,485
Talking of stacking tc's ....I've tried that on a few very desperate occasions in the last couple of months (1.4x, 2x, 500mm). Good light & stop down to f8+ & crank the iso up to get a sensible shutter-speed if needed & expect to do much in-computer & a prayer to whatever god you can think of.

Don't expect miracles...but it may save your bacon in those once in a lifetime opportunities where you just can't get close ....wallcreeper 100 yards away across mine field. Though I may just gamble on not stepping on any mines
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 30th May 2004, 17:50   #15
Paulyoly
Senior Member
 
Paulyoly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 252
I've seen plenty of sharp images with a 2x converter, but not on a canon 100-400L IS. Mostly using the canon 500 f4L.
Paulyoly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 100-400L lense + x2 converter pdackerman Canon 10 Saturday 3rd April 2004 17:18
Canon eos30 +100-400 and 1.4 converter LeeDavis Say Hello 3 Saturday 14th February 2004 21:26
Using a video converter lens on a cp4500 stevo Andy Bright's Digiscoping Forum 4 Saturday 6th September 2003 23:13

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.16942596 seconds with 25 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:45.