|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
To do this, press the menu button, and under the left hand menu (camera icon) scroll to the botton then select the Save Settings option. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
230 and counting!
|
Thanks Steve - I hadn't twigged that 'Save Settings' covered ALL setting i.e. those set under the Function Set as well as via the Menu. But someone I've now got the AF-Point Zoom and AF Frame options greyed out - any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,451
|
I had the same problem last week. After a bit of investigation, it seems that you can't have these on when one of the other settings is on too.
I'm not sure exactly what this was, but try duplicating my settings in the (camera icon) menu. The mode dial on top of the camera should be set to C (custom). |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
230 and counting!
|
hmm
seems very odd! Options are now back after I turned continuous shooting option off. But when I turned it back on again they are still there, which makes me think I'm missing something... |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Registered User
|
Hi all,
Providing some more samples taken with S-95 / Nikon ED82A with the DS30X eyepiece. Conditions were quite windy with wind speed around 7-8 meter/second Pictures taken using RAW format, self-timer, default camera settings, applying some toning and sharpening in Digital Photo Professional before final resizing. Roe Deer (Cloudy) Distance to subject: 200 meters ISO 80 Tv 1/100 s Av 4.0 FL 12.8 mm (on a scale 6.0 mm - 22.5 mm) This one shows OK technical quality, but nothing special. Roe Deer (Sunny) The motif is less interesting with the deer showing their posteriors just as the sun broke through for a few seconds but the technical quality of the picture is clearly better with quite good detail rendering. ISO 80 Tv 1/200 s Av 4.0 FL 9.6 mm (on a scale 6.0 mm - 22.5 mm) Ship Distance to subject: 2-3 km ISO 80 Tv 1/500 s Av 4.0 FL 9.6 mm (on a scale 6.0 mm - 22.5 mm) This one is quite good in my opinion and demonstrates that the camera/scope combo has little chromatic abberation and is capable of delivering a quite stunning level of detail. You can actually discern fine details in the ship's structure. I believe the favorable light conditions helped here. Lessons learned (?): Increase ISO to achieve shorter exposure times? |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#56 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
I think you could go to a higher ISO setting and still not suffer too much from excessive noise (grain). Try up ISO 200 next time if conditions are bright, though from the looks of these I don't think it would make much difference to your images as they all look to be slow moving, especially as you also used the timer. I think atmospheric conditions are your biggest enemy here, unless of course you wanted the heat shimmer to be part of the effect of your pictures. Don't be afraid to get closer to your subject, but most importantly, keep 'em coming.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hong Kong (ex Sydney)
Posts: 9,082
|
[quote=Tord;2060245]Hi,
......All pictures were shot att about 50 meters distance. Please let me know what you think of the quality and what I could do to improve it. " Looking at the pictures the last one seems to be the sharpest, probably because the lens wasn't zoomed as much as the others. I've found that the more you zoom the camera lens the more trouble the camera Auto Focus has . I often will Manual Focus over half zoom. But generally the best photos come with the zoom less than 50/% , particularly over water ( haze ). Nice efforts. Neil |
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 95
|
Tord, nice pictures. FYI, the deer are fallow deer, not roe deer.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Registered User
|
[quote=Neil;2071558]
Quote:
You are right. I have noticed a correlation between FL and sharpness. The FL used for the last picture is 12.8 mm on a scale 6.0 - 22.5 mm. All others are taken at either 15.0 or 18.2 mm. I would say the highest degree of magnification without loosing sharpness is 15.0 mm. At longest FL pictures become "soft". I don't think it's an AF limitation though - pictures are still sharp but resolution is impacted (if you see what I mean). I would guess it is an optical limitation (but I may be wrong). For reference this picture was taken at 15 mm FL: http://www.birdforum.net/attachment....9&d=1298498017 Picture is aken at long distance 2-3 km, heat shimmer noticeable in spite of temperature way below freezing point. If the wheather allows I will do some more tests this weekend, consistently using shorter FL. /Tord |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#60 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
/Tord |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 43
|
Guys
Can I ask please.... re the S95 When using it for digiscoping do you use any form of cable release for firing the shutter or just the shutter button?? Thank you in advance David |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#63 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I therefore use the timer, preset on one second delay and shooting a sequence (found 3 shots usually a good compromise between waste and likelihood of getting a decent shot). Firing manually may work, but due to high risk of blur due to camera shake, shooting a sequence is highly recommended. Second shot and beyond should be sharp. /Tord |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#64 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 61
|
Hi, can I ask how you change the timer from the default 10 seconds to 1 second, I can see how you change the number of shots but not the actual timer.
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
Don't forget to save this setting in the menu, or it will revert back to 10 seconds next time you use the camera. Last edited by SteveClifton : Wednesday 2nd March 2011 at 19:56. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 1,168
|
I really like the cable release, almost indispensible. When I get the bird in focus, press fully and let the good times roll until not seen in monitor. To set it up isn't that big a deal and it sure pays with results.
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 61
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 16
|
[quote=Neil;2041650]
Quote:
I'm also trying to find this adapter in Hong Kong. Would you please let me know the shop name in Mongkok if you found it. Cheers, Davis |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hong Kong (ex Sydney)
Posts: 9,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 16
|
I see... Thanks a lot!
Davis |
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wootton Bassett
Posts: 68
|
The light has improved in the UK and I have managed to get out with my S95. With the right settings it is taking pictures almost as nice as the 7D.
Here is a Tawny Owl that was prepared to pose for me. ![]()
__________________
Rod Canon 7D, 17-85mm f4-5.6, 50mm f1.4, 100-400mm f4.5-f5.6 Canon S95, Swarovski 80 ATM HD, 20-60x EP, TLS800, UCA |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 1,343
|
This thread has been very useful so thanks Steve in particular!
What do you use to connect the Jackar adapator to the lens of the scope itself? I've always hand held for digiscoping before so all this is new to me.
__________________
Jonathan Newman World 6768 latest Giant Ibis, Chestnut-headed Partridge Garden moth list 752 latest Wax Moth |
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
230 and counting!
|
I use a simple step down ring - my Baader 13mm has 42 mm threads so after a couple of false starts when I managed to get thread sizes wrong and then buy a step rather than a step down ring I'm sorted. The technique for screwing onto the lens is to loosen the locking collet on my PF65ED scope so that the lens (with step down ring in place) can screw into the adaptor - that way you're not rotating the camera/adaptor combination which would be very awkward.
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-...warovski%20DCA If you are not sure what this is, it basically allows a 'quick-release' connection between the Jackar Adapter and the scope's eyepiece. It has an inner and outer sleeve. The inner part stays attached to the eyepiece, and the outer part remains attached to the camera/adapter. The outer sleeve slides quickly over the inner part and is secured by a single screw. There is a picture of it all connected up in post 28 of this thread, (pic 2, and again in pic 5) A cheaper method might be to use John's method, utilising a step-ring directly to an eyepiece thread such as on the Baader eyepieces, but you would lose the rapid removal function which I find invaluable for birding. Below is a video demonstrating the DCA with a DSLR camera. You can also connect a compact camera using the same method, but most modern compact cameras lack any form of lens threads, hence the use of the Jackar Adapter to hold the camera via it's tripod thread: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acsu332q9w4 And the DCA with a compact camera: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoDE_...eature=related Last edited by SteveClifton : Saturday 16th April 2011 at 10:18. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 1,343
|
Thanks Steve and John.
__________________
Jonathan Newman World 6768 latest Giant Ibis, Chestnut-headed Partridge Garden moth list 752 latest Wax Moth |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Canon S95 first digiscoped pics/review on the net | Paul Hackett | Digiscoping cameras | 28 | Monday 13th June 2011 01:45 |
| Is the Canon S95 really an improvement over the Canon S90? | TheBirdGarden | Digiscoping cameras | 16 | Saturday 8th January 2011 21:03 |
| Canon powershot A1100 IS and Canon 590 Is any good for digiscoping | kevin crisp | Digiscoping cameras | 1 | Wednesday 20th January 2010 22:47 |
| Best Canon for digiscoping ? | cymruboy | Canon | 10 | Saturday 6th January 2007 15:23 |
| Anyone tried digiscoping with the new Canon G6? | steveblain | Canon | 5 | Thursday 23rd September 2004 12:52 |