Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 19th August 2011, 05:50   #1
BodyResults
Registered User
 
BodyResults's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 395
Gitzo GT1531 sturdy enough for Canon 300mm f2.8II (when it's out)

I'm looking to get a new tripod for my wife. I would like to get about the lightest tripod possible that will still have enough stability. She currently uses the 100-400 lens on a 7D. In the future I'm considering the Canon 300mm f2.8 II lens for her that will only weight 5 pounds.

In your opinion do you think the GT1531 Mountaineer 6X Carbon Fiber Tripod is suitable for that lens?

Thanks
Doug


BodyResults is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2011
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 19th August 2011, 12:22   #2
Jaff
Super Moderator
 
Jaff's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 12,325
They say as a rule of thumb your tripod's maximum weight rating should be at least twice that of the kit your putting on it for the best stability. It'd be fine for the 100-400mm but for the other lens you would be best with a tripod rated to 10-12kg (22-26lbs).
__________________
The views and opinions expressed by me on this Forum are not necessarily those of my brain.
Check me out on Flickr too http://www.flickr.com/photos/adam_l_jarvis/
My Website http://aljphotography.zenfolio.com/
Website Updated 18/03/2013
Jaff
Jaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 19th August 2011, 15:41   #3
johnf3f
johnf3f

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Wales UK
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaff View Post
They say as a rule of thumb your tripod's maximum weight rating should be at least twice that of the kit your putting on it for the best stability. It'd be fine for the 100-400mm but for the other lens you would be best with a tripod rated to 10-12kg (22-26lbs).
+1
Also consider the focal lenths you will be using - Gitzo give (conservative) recommendations as to what is appropriate, have a look at their site.
My personal suggestion would be to go for the GT2531 rater than the 1 series. I have the GT2531 and rate it very highly. It is a little heavier but the additional vibration damping and rigidity is worth it IMO.
johnf3f is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 19th August 2011, 16:01   #4
BodyResults
Registered User
 
BodyResults's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 395
Thanks for the feedback guys.

The weight ratio of tripod rating divided by Canon 7D + 300mmf 2.8II + ext 2x iii = 2.3 add a flash like the 430ii and it is still 2.1

You do make a good point about the focal length recomendation. I suppose for $40 less, 66% higher weight rating and .5 pounds more it probably better my needs.

Thanks
Doug
BodyResults is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2011
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 19th August 2011, 17:15   #5
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,447
Have you considered the new Gitzo Safari Range?

They're now doing a birding kit which I was fortunate to review for Bird Forum - http://www.birdforum.net/reviews/sho...7/limit/recent

I was using it mostly with a Canon 7D and Canon 400mm f5,6 +/- teleconverters. It's compact, lightweight and very sturdy.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 20th August 2011, 22:54   #6
johnf3f
johnf3f

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Wales UK
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by BodyResults View Post
Thanks for the feedback guys.

The weight ratio of tripod rating divided by Canon 7D + 300mmf 2.8II + ext 2x iii = 2.3 add a flash like the 430ii and it is still 2.1

You do make a good point about the focal length recomendation. I suppose for $40 less, 66% higher weight rating and .5 pounds more it probably better my needs.

Thanks
Doug
Sorry I didn't realise you were intending to use a 2x extender as well! Defintely 2 series or bigger. I know it sounds like overkill when you look at the weight ratings as Gitzo's will hold FAR more than their rated weights - my 3530LS has, once, supported 100Kilo (me!) not bad considering it's 18 Kilo rating! The problem is long focal lengths (you will be approaching a 1 meter field of view) so IMO rigidity and vibration damping become the top priorities. I use both the GT2531 and CT3530LS and they both do well with my 600 F4 & 1D4 but the 3 series is significantly better at damping vibration. With your lighter (but similar focal length) setup I would go 2 series or better, it's well worth the extra weight!
johnf3f is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 21st August 2011, 02:24   #7
Jaff
Super Moderator
 
Jaff's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 12,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnf3f View Post
Sorry I didn't realise you were intending to use a 2x extender as well! Defintely 2 series or bigger. I know it sounds like overkill when you look at the weight ratings as Gitzo's will hold FAR more than their rated weights - my 3530LS has, once, supported 100Kilo (me!) not bad considering it's 18 Kilo rating! The problem is long focal lengths (you will be approaching a 1 meter field of view) so IMO rigidity and vibration damping become the top priorities. I use both the GT2531 and CT3530LS and they both do well with my 600 F4 & 1D4 but the 3 series is significantly better at damping vibration. With your lighter (but similar focal length) setup I would go 2 series or better, it's well worth the extra weight!
I won't ask how you tested that out but you've given me the rather amusing mental image of you balancing on your tripod with one foot while you're arms and free leg flail wildly as you try to maintain your balance.

On a more serious note, don't forget the head Doug! You'll need a good gimbal head as well as a good tripod for that list of kit you posted.
__________________
The views and opinions expressed by me on this Forum are not necessarily those of my brain.
Check me out on Flickr too http://www.flickr.com/photos/adam_l_jarvis/
My Website http://aljphotography.zenfolio.com/
Website Updated 18/03/2013
Jaff
Jaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 21st August 2011, 05:18   #8
BodyResults
Registered User
 
BodyResults's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 395
Thanks for all the advice guys. This is exactly why I posted here. thanks for helping me avoid a mistake. Looks like GT2531 is the one I'll go with.
BodyResults is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2011
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 21st August 2011, 21:08   #9
kurakura
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 172
I would go for a 3-series. That is what I use with a Tokina 300mm 2.8
kurakura is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 22nd August 2011, 22:21   #10
johnf3f
johnf3f

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Wales UK
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaff View Post
I won't ask how you tested that out but you've given me the rather amusing mental image of you balancing on your tripod with one foot while you're arms and free leg flail wildly as you try to maintain your balance.

On a more serious note, don't forget the head Doug! You'll need a good gimbal head as well as a good tripod for that list of kit you posted.
Just sat on it to prove a point after comments about me using it as a prop to help me gat up after some low level photography - dodgy knees and arthritic hip! Sorry to spoil the image but:
1. it's a Sytematic - so it's wider at the top!

2. it wan't fully extended! At my weight I am NO ACROBAT!

P.S. - don't know if it's true but I read of another idiot (smaller 77 Kilo model) who reportedly suspended himself under a Gt2531! Page 4 of my 2007 Gitzo Catalogue shows a Mountaineer (3 series?) with the legs splayed at their second widest setting, but not extended, with 99Kilo on top!

Last edited by johnf3f : Monday 22nd August 2011 at 22:29. Reason: Post Script
johnf3f is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras JMomOhio Canon 4 Sunday 30th March 2008 18:38
Canon 75-300mm EF III or Sigma 70-300mm Macro DG CurtMorgan Canon 3 Monday 14th May 2007 04:28
Canon 350D w/Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofoc geraleigh Canon 4 Thursday 2nd February 2006 12:19

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.19815612 seconds with 19 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:47.