Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 2.50 average.
Old Tuesday 18th October 2011, 22:41   #76
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks Ric, you echo a lot of my thoughts about the FZ150 (still awaiting delivery), I think as a camera for bird photographs, it is one of the best around. Its not a DSLR, but seems to produce excellent quality as opposed to the superb quality of a DSLR, although I think that on some occasions (like sunny conditions) it may produce images that are very close in quality. I'm also pleased to hear your practical experiences, as they confirm what I was hoping the camera should do. I currently have the FZ100 and have three batteries myself, but I have never been in a situation where I have needed more than two. I can also get well over a thousand shots out of a single battery, but that involves lots of "bursts". Bursts of 50 shots runs up the numbers quite quickly, but don't seem to drain the battery.


scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 18th October 2011, 22:44   #77
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
I see what you mean, but I don't consider the blurred back leg and antenna a problem. That simply came about because of the wide aperture you used. The bits that are in the front are super clear.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 19th October 2011, 10:14   #78
garry1366
Registered Member
 
garry1366's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beverley
Posts: 888
Does anyone have any hands on thoughts of how the light speed autofocus performs?

I had a Canon S2 several years ago and found speed of focus to be the limiting factor of it when taking bird shots so upgraded to a DSLR, which has died. So I'm trying to decide whether to get rid of my lens and go back to a super zoom or spend lots more money on a new DSLR body. I only ever use my pics for the web so I don't really need the outright quality of a DSLR.

Cheers
G
garry1366 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 19th October 2011, 21:40   #79
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 2,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by ric alexander View Post
......One word of warning, Dont expect 1 battery to be enough. This is the BIGGEST pitfall. no optical viewfinder is going to mean you need some spares. .....
. This, IMO is the best superzoom and is well worth investment
ric alexander WELCOME to BirdForum. And thanks for sharing your experiences. I fully support your opinion that one needs a spare battery. I'd guess a single spare would do for most regular users though.

You certainly have added to my confidence that this ought to become my next camera.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 19th October 2011, 23:31   #80
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Hi Garry, This may or may not answer your question about the "light speed" autofocus. For starters, I don't own an FZ150 - yet. On order still waiting delivery. The "light speed" autofocus is the same system as used on the G3 and GH2. Trusted Reviews said this about the autofocus
"We’re impressed by the G3’s overall performance, especially its super quick autofocus system. Used in good light the G3’s contrast-detect AF system is as good as instantaneous, and also holds up pretty well in less than optimal light too, with a bright orange AF assist lamp coming to the camera’s aid if required. Overall, if you’re looking for a camera that’s quick enough to capture the moment before it’s gone, the G3 is a sound bet. "

Photographyblog's test on the G3 said the following about the "light speed" autofocus

"Panasonic have published marketing data which suggests that the G3's AF is as fast, if not faster, than a typical DSLR camera's, with a claimed speed of less than 0.1 second when used with certain lenses, and a still impressive 0.18 second with the 14-42mm kit lens. In practice I noticed very little difference in speed between the G3 and a DSLR, and there were also very few occasions when the G3 failed to lock onto the subject, especially when using the centre AF point."

While both these reviews apply to a different Panasonic camera, the system used in both is the same, so performance should be similar. Ric is actually using one and hopefully he will be able to add some real life experiences with this camera.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th October 2011, 00:03   #81
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Here's a review by Photographyblog on the FZ150' autofocus

"The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150's new Light Speed auto-focus system lives up to its name and is very fast to determine focus at around 0.1 seconds, plus there's virtually no shutter delay to speak of when you take a shot"
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th October 2011, 06:28   #82
al-Natural
Naturalist 'on-line'
 
al-Natural's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Spain
Posts: 48
Thumbs up FZ150, Yes, it can!

Hello to all,
I am a proud owner of a Lumix FZ150, also owning a FZ45. I used to be a Nikon DLSR addict but also a professional naturalist, birdwatcher and wildlife tour leader, so it came a day that telescope, tripod1, cameras, tripod 2, binoculars, books, notebook, GPS and other stuff turned me into a kind of Mediterranean Sherpa. No way, I thought! and I sold my heavy photo stuff.

After having tested many models I arrived to the Panasonic Lumix FZ series pier, where I first bought a FZ100 model. After a couple of days, I gave it back because of the poor quality of the images taken with zoom at high range which gave a 'watercolour effect' more than neat images, due to the noise effect driven by the CMOS sensor.

Then I tested a FZ45 camera, where Panasonic partially solved the former noise effect as the camera has a built-in CCD sensor. Images started to be crispy enough for me. I have enjoyed many pictures with this gear, but I consider that speed focusing and a tilting LCD screen is a must for Nature photography, that's why I tested -and then bought- a FZ150.

FZ150 is a superb camera for me. Its new MOS sensor 'not an old CMOS one' on the FZ100 is a kind of CCD and CMOS hybrid, and the the sensor noise given now is lesser than the previous one in the FZ45 model. Superb!

But... have in mind! A bridge camera IS NOT a DSLR, and a wildlife image probably never will beat one taken with a 600 mm f:2.8 tube and a Nikon/Canon professional camera body, but who can afford expensive gear like that?

If you, as me, are interested in very decent shots, a satisfactory zoom range (unbeateable to document rarities or species seen very far), a superb macro with a comfortable Manual focus mode for insects and wildflowers, a very good quality landscape and general shots, the FZ150 should be nominated as your camera.

'The better the light, the better the shot', an obvious saying that in a brigde camera is a must. This, and use a tripod as oftenly as you can!!!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/6303749...7627865634808/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/6303749...7627741299431/

Saludos

Jorge
PS. I enclose links to both pictures taken with a FZ150. Hope you like them!
al-Natural is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th October 2011, 07:48   #83
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Hi Jorge, I agree with everything you've said, although I kept my FZ100. I got the FZ150 today and really haven't had a proper play with it yet, as its getting dark here in Australia. Tomorrow I'll give it a better test. I like your pics as well.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th October 2011, 07:59   #84
speckled wood
Tea and Coffee Maker
 
speckled wood's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Torbay, Devon
Posts: 1,231
I had the FZ45 until I dropped it, the only downside for me on the FZ45 was the lack of a tilting screen, (other than the lack of a tilting screen) ,I would have been happy with it now had I not dropped it and would certainly not be upgrading to the FZ47 or the FZ150.

As it is after I dropped my FZ45 and not being able to quickly obtain another FZ45 or FZ100 at a reasonable price I took an alternative route to the Fuji HS10 and then HS20 and I don't see myself making an upgrade from there any time soon.
speckled wood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st October 2011, 00:22   #85
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Today I was going to try out the FZ150, but currently its raining, so I'll have to wait a little while and hope it clears. However, I have a couple of thoughts on the camera, both positive. Firstly the Ai mode now allows you to set the size of the image, eg 8mp, the result being that it then allows you to use the izoom feature, which isn't available in the Ai mode on previous FZ models. The other interesting feature (especially for bird shots) is that when you are in autofocus and you half depress the shutter button to focus (which seems quite fast), if the side lever is set to focus, you can then manually focus the camera. In other words, if the camera focuses on some leaves or branches, rather than the bird, all you have to do is continue to hold the focus button down and at the same time move the lever up or down to focus on the subject. How good is that? That's way better than the arrangement on the FZ100. Another feature is that the 12 fps will fire at that rate even when the ISO is greater than 100, unlike the FZ100, where once you upped the ISO the burst rate dropped to around 5 fps. I hope to have more information about the camera once I really get into using it properly.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st October 2011, 09:54   #86
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 2,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by scodgerott View Post

....izoom feature
...... you can then manually focus the camera......
Great news, indeed. Not sure what the izoom feature brings, though. But that manual focus is exactly what I need. Now if only the EVF were a bit better to allow more precise focus adjustments.

I notice, by the way, that the price of the camera is starting to drop a bit. At least on US internet platforms.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 22nd October 2011, 16:54   #87
firstreesjohn
Registered User
 
firstreesjohn's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by scodgerott View Post
when you are in autofocus and you half depress the shutter button to focus (which seems quite fast), if the side lever is set to focus, you can then manually focus the camera.
I tried this out today. It also magnifies an area in the EVF.

It proved almost impossible to get the focus sharp 'in' the EVF- but I will try again and take some test pix.

Here's a link to the same shot, just cropped and then edited: http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.ph...ostcount=13661
__________________
A Conifer ID Information Collective (ACIDIC)
Avian Considerations Examined, then Rare Bird Information Communicated (ACERBIC)
Information Recall Oblast- Nature In Charge (IRONIC)
Specific Area Research Done; Observations Not Initially Confirmed (SARDONIC)
firstreesjohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 24th October 2011, 19:58   #88
Mabs
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Shetland/Edinburgh
Posts: 26
Hi there folks.
I'm thoroughly enjoying this camera and I've had some lovely portraits out of it and action shots of my dog jumping.
I've not had any good bird shots yet but here's a link to a video I shot today of a squirrel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIRGt_bHCiE

I need to resize the photos but in the meantime here is a link to one on facebook. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...1&l=7e3030b1b5

Cheers.
Mabs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th October 2011, 12:20   #89
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 2,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swissboy View Post
....You certainly have added to my confidence that this ought to become my next camera.
Ok, mine is on the way now. It will still take a bit till I actually have it though.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 26th October 2011, 06:41   #90
al-Natural
Naturalist 'on-line'
 
al-Natural's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Spain
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mabs View Post
Hi there folks.
I'm thoroughly enjoying this camera and I've had some lovely portraits out of it and action shots of my dog jumping.
I've not had any good bird shots yet but here's a link to a video I shot today of a squirrel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIRGt_bHCiE
Hi Mabs,
Congrats for the clip, I find it very good indeed. How did you edit it to become a Youtube video?

Thanks in advance.

Jorge
__________________
From Andalucía, sharing the amazing snowy summits in Sierra Nevada and the superb Doñana marshes.
Web: http://www.al-natural.eu
Check my TWITTER channel.
al-Natural is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 26th October 2011, 08:29   #91
al-Natural
Naturalist 'on-line'
 
al-Natural's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Spain
Posts: 48
Sierra Nevada scenery

Here I am again
Just to show you one of the FZ150 shots I took last night at sunset, using the tripod, and no crops!!! Zoom at about 50% of its total range!!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/6303749...4694/lightbox/

Saludos!
Jorge
__________________
From Andalucía, sharing the amazing snowy summits in Sierra Nevada and the superb Doñana marshes.
Web: http://www.al-natural.eu
Check my TWITTER channel.
al-Natural is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 26th October 2011, 14:55   #92
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Beautiful shot Jorge. I am getting some good results with mine as well. I will do some posting on Flickr soon.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th October 2011, 19:39   #93
al-Natural
Naturalist 'on-line'
 
al-Natural's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Spain
Posts: 48
Thank you!! I will do an autumn tour tomorrow hoping to get shots to show you. Waiting for your images to see!!
Saludos!

Jorge
__________________
From Andalucía, sharing the amazing snowy summits in Sierra Nevada and the superb Doñana marshes.
Web: http://www.al-natural.eu
Check my TWITTER channel.
al-Natural is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 12:25   #94
Marys1000
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 74
Heres a rather stupid question....are the 150 and 150K the same thing?
Price on Amazon US is now 419.00 dollars.
My priorities are ease of use and sharp pictures, no tripod. Don't care about much else. Have an old Z3 and must say that the viewfinders, both electric and optical were awful. Sometimes it was just point and hope. This has made me wonder about other brands but honestly it just gets too exhausting to try to figure out. Don't understand why the tilt viewfind is so important, just hoping its better than the old one.
Marys1000 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 15:44   #95
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 2,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marys1000 View Post
Heres a rather stupid question....are the 150 and 150K the same thing?
Price on Amazon US is now 419.00 dollars.
......... Don't understand why the tilt viewfind is so important, just hoping its better than the old one.
Can't answer the first part, but I have wondered about that too.

As for the viewfinders, the one most important feature on ANY camera to me is an EVF, or an optical one for that matter. But one that allows to stabilize the camera while taking pictures or videos, and one that works under all light conditions.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 16:20   #96
njlarsen
Opus Editor
 
njlarsen's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portsmouth, Dominica
Posts: 12,861
With Pana, letters following the number often denotes color, but can also seemingly be filler. The GH2 for example, have the following two models:
DMC-GH2K-K Black
DMC-GH2K-S Silver

according to Amazon.com. What the first K means I don't know, but it makes me believe that the 150 and 150K indeed are the same thing.

Niels
__________________
Support bird conservation in the Caribbean: SCSCB
njlarsen is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 16:30   #97
Dryocopus
Was Eagle before...still am in life!
 
Dryocopus's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by scodgerott View Post
The other interesting feature (especially for bird shots) is that when you are in autofocus and you half depress the shutter button to focus (which seems quite fast), if the side lever is set to focus, you can then manually focus the camera. In other words, if the camera focuses on some leaves or branches, rather than the bird, all you have to do is continue to hold the focus button down and at the same time move the lever up or down to focus on the subject.
iA? or A?

which side focus - MF ?

I found ia was great for scenery - but not for birds in trees - this would help -
just need clarity above thanks
__________________
Eagles Rule!

C


http://eagles-eye-on-life.blogspot.com/
Dryocopus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 19:37   #98
firstreesjohn
Registered User
 
firstreesjohn's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marys1000 View Post
Don't understand why the tilt viewfind is so important
It’s particularly useful when taking, for example, insects that may be too high for one’s eye or at an odd angle.

Also, and similarly, video.

I have noticed that there is a concentration of ‘buttons’, on the rear of the camera and around the thumb plate: it is very easy to activate one of these inadvertently. The ‘Playback’ and ‘Video’ could also do with being less flush to the body and, as a result, are slightly difficult to locate by feel- usually necessitating a quick glance.

I am still more than happy with it, though.
__________________
A Conifer ID Information Collective (ACIDIC)
Avian Considerations Examined, then Rare Bird Information Communicated (ACERBIC)
Information Recall Oblast- Nature In Charge (IRONIC)
Specific Area Research Done; Observations Not Initially Confirmed (SARDONIC)
firstreesjohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 19:48   #99
scodgerott
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princes Hill Victoria Australia
Posts: 311
Hi, yes the fz150 and fz150k are the same camera.
Not sure why the now superceded fz100 is more expensive
than the fz150. The K stands for black. There is no other colour
variant on this model.

Last edited by scodgerott : Sunday 30th October 2011 at 19:54.
scodgerott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 30th October 2011, 19:53   #100
Hobbes2
Registered User
 
Hobbes2's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,525
Apologies if this has already been covered in the thread (if so, please point me back in the right direction ), but I wondered if it was possible to attach the 1.7 teleconverter to the FZ150 (with a suitable adapter)?
Thanks
Hobbes
Hobbes2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the best Panasonic for me TheBirdGarden Digiscoping cameras 11 Thursday 21st October 2010 22:35
Panasonic G1 El CID Digiscoping cameras 14 Wednesday 28th July 2010 05:28
panasonic fz 28 sonofelvis Panasonic 2 Friday 31st July 2009 09:27
Which panasonic? Steve Babbs Panasonic 2 Monday 22nd October 2007 11:28
Which is the best Panasonic-fz? lvn600 Panasonic 7 Tuesday 11th October 2005 11:13

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.21613407 seconds with 35 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53.