|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
passionate binophilo "poet"
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mid-Atlantic Region
Posts: 3,099
|
£400=$256.42 My, how the Almighty Dollar has fallen.
Most of the "entry level price" roofs I've tried have been full sized models. Some pretty good for the price like the Vortex 8x42 Fury. As close as I've gotten to midsized at this price point is the Pentax 8x36 NV, which is within your budget. It's lightweight, but it's not small - 6" long! As long as most full sized roofs. Longer than some. But you pay another kind of price when playing "Honey I Shrank the Bins". All the 8x32 roofs that I have tried with the exception of the 8x32 EL have two things in common - they all showed a shallow perception of depth and an image that is more 2-D than 3-D. I wouldn't recommend any of them for that reason. Also, the larger FOV usually comes at the expense of field curvature (fuzzy edges) at this price point. If I were going to buy an 8x32/30, I'd go for a porro. More "crown for the pound" than £400 roofs, and you don't lose nearly as much depth perception and 3-D effect. To me this important, because it helps birds "pop out" from their background environment, and it's easier on my eyes because it means less fuss focusing. I haven't tried the Leupold 8x30 Yosemite, but thought the 6x30 model was good for its price point. If the 8x is as good quality, that would be the best bang for your buck. You could buy two! Since sample variation runs rampart at this price point, that might be a good idea. Here's a thread on this model: http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=74014&page=3 If you buy a midsized porro within your budget and like it, in the future you might want to double your investment and buy better quality optics for twice the price, maybe a Nikon 8x32 SE or a 8x30 EII. Note that neither the SE or EII are waterproof if that's a major concern. Brock
__________________
The human impact on biological diversity... |
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 732
|
Quote:
Still for sale by the way.... Perry |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Whiston, Staffordshire
Posts: 22
|
Brock, i appreciate what you say about a good pair of porro's against a similarly priced set of roofs. However i do prefer the compactness of the roof design and think thats the way i'll be going. Incidentally how do they produce superior porro's for the money, it is something that I have wondered about.
On another note, I've visited the RSPB shop at Carsington Water today and tried a number of different pairs, I was particularly impressed with the RSPB HD 8x32, I even compared them with the Leica Ultravid 8x32 and struggled to see a real difference especially considering that they are three times the price. The list of candidates is getting longer and I will have to set a day aside when i can compare them. Cheers Stonesy. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 973
|
Brock I think you have your currency calculator backwards as 1 pound equals 1.56 $$ Last edited by lilcrazy2 : Sunday 2nd October 2011 at 16:42. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
|
I'm not sure if you have your new bins yet but heres my 2p's worth:
Minox 8x33 HG MIG - I agree with the other poster about its slow performance. I sold mine due to the fussy focusing and for some reason couldn't get the diopter adjustment spot on. They are very good but not a birders binocular. Meopta Meopro - Too narrow FOV, not as good as the Meostar which would be the best if you can find a used pair, they are very very good. Sharp and a wide FOV of 138m Vortex Viper - very good build and sharpness, good in the hand but only 122m FOV if i'm not mistaken Opticron Imagic/verano - well worth a try, good birders bins. Nikon HGL 8x32 now available for £550 if you shop around. Over your budget but ace optics but heavy and bulky. Jason |
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: northland
Posts: 10,540
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 141
|
On the Viper's FOV: the 8x42 does have a rather paltry 122m, but the 8x32 Stonesy66 was considering has abt. 133m- not stunningly expansive, but pretty good.
Last edited by SEOW : Sunday 15th January 2012 at 18:06. Reason: grammatical correction |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CA on low to mid price roofs? | gweller | Binoculars | 20 | Friday 18th April 2008 10:13 |
| Best 7x42 (low/mid-price) | solentbirder | Binoculars | 33 | Saturday 9th September 2006 07:55 |
| Best low-mid price 10x50 roofs ? | solentbirder | Binoculars | 11 | Wednesday 26th October 2005 16:58 |
| Mid-price bins? Opinions please. | smallblueplanet | Binoculars | 11 | Sunday 11th April 2004 07:41 |
| Mid price Binoculars. | Tamir | Binoculars | 14 | Tuesday 9th December 2003 11:34 |