Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Sunday 2nd October 2011, 05:12   #26
brocknroller
passionate binophilo "poet"
 
brocknroller's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mid-Atlantic Region
Posts: 3,099
£400=$256.42 My, how the Almighty Dollar has fallen.

Most of the "entry level price" roofs I've tried have been full sized models. Some pretty good for the price like the Vortex 8x42 Fury.

As close as I've gotten to midsized at this price point is the Pentax 8x36 NV, which is within your budget. It's lightweight, but it's not small - 6" long! As long as most full sized roofs. Longer than some.

But you pay another kind of price when playing "Honey I Shrank the Bins".

All the 8x32 roofs that I have tried with the exception of the 8x32 EL have two things in common - they all showed a shallow perception of depth and an image that is more 2-D than 3-D.

I wouldn't recommend any of them for that reason. Also, the larger FOV usually comes at the expense of field curvature (fuzzy edges) at this price point.

If I were going to buy an 8x32/30, I'd go for a porro. More "crown for the pound" than £400 roofs, and you don't lose nearly as much depth perception and 3-D effect. To me this important, because it helps birds "pop out" from their background environment, and it's easier on my eyes because it means less fuss focusing.

I haven't tried the Leupold 8x30 Yosemite, but thought the 6x30 model was good for its price point. If the 8x is as good quality, that would be the best bang for your buck. You could buy two! Since sample variation runs rampart at this price point, that might be a good idea.

Here's a thread on this model:

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=74014&page=3

If you buy a midsized porro within your budget and like it, in the future you might want to double your investment and buy better quality optics for twice the price, maybe a Nikon 8x32 SE or a 8x30 EII.

Note that neither the SE or EII are waterproof if that's a major concern.

Brock


brocknroller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 2nd October 2011, 10:50   #27
Perry Grin
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoayo View Post
There is a pair of hawke 8x36 ED for sale in this forum for 180 pounds...This model and brand have already a solid reputation,at least in this forum!..They are a variant brand of the same binocular,(ED glass, open bridge ) sold in the USA,by ZEN and EO,even Vortex has similar models (at a higher price)...I have owned the 8x43 and 7x36 ZEN versions and they are SUPER NICE...for 180 pounds ,they are a a great pair..I doubt any of the pairs you mentioned at double the price are better than this binoculars..including the Minox HG...by the way ,Is the Minox the old (japan)or new (Germany) versions?..If Its the German made model,it is a fair price,and worth the money ,because it will keep a good resale value,if you decide that you dont want them
Thanks for the plug!

Still for sale by the way....

Perry
Perry Grin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 2nd October 2011, 16:08   #28
Stonesy66
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Whiston, Staffordshire
Posts: 22
Brock, i appreciate what you say about a good pair of porro's against a similarly priced set of roofs. However i do prefer the compactness of the roof design and think thats the way i'll be going. Incidentally how do they produce superior porro's for the money, it is something that I have wondered about.
On another note, I've visited the RSPB shop at Carsington Water today and tried a number of different pairs, I was particularly impressed with the RSPB HD 8x32, I even compared them with the Leica Ultravid 8x32 and struggled to see a real difference especially considering that they are three times the price.
The list of candidates is getting longer and I will have to set a day aside when i can compare them.

Cheers Stonesy.
Stonesy66 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 2nd October 2011, 16:40   #29
lilcrazy2
Registered User
 
lilcrazy2's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by brocknroller View Post
£400=$256.42 My, how the Almighty Dollar has fallen. Brock




Brock
I think you have your currency calculator backwards as 1 pound equals 1.56 $$

Last edited by lilcrazy2 : Sunday 2nd October 2011 at 16:42.
lilcrazy2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 15th January 2012, 08:39   #30
mosschops
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Crewe
Posts: 205
I'm not sure if you have your new bins yet but heres my 2p's worth:
Minox 8x33 HG MIG - I agree with the other poster about its slow performance. I sold mine due to the fussy focusing and for some reason couldn't get the diopter adjustment spot on. They are very good but not a birders binocular.
Meopta Meopro - Too narrow FOV, not as good as the Meostar which would be the best if you can find a used pair, they are very very good. Sharp and a wide FOV of 138m
Vortex Viper - very good build and sharpness, good in the hand but only 122m FOV if i'm not mistaken
Opticron Imagic/verano - well worth a try, good birders bins.
Nikon HGL 8x32 now available for £550 if you shop around. Over your budget but ace optics but heavy and bulky.

Jason
mosschops is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 15th January 2012, 17:55   #31
flossiepip
Registered User
 
flossiepip's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: northland
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonesy66 View Post
Brock, i appreciate what you say about a good pair of porro's against a similarly priced set of roofs. However i do prefer the compactness of the roof design and think thats the way i'll be going. Incidentally how do they produce superior porro's for the money, it is something that I have wondered about.
On another note, I've visited the RSPB shop at Carsington Water today and tried a number of different pairs, I was particularly impressed with the RSPB HD 8x32, I even compared them with the Leica Ultravid 8x32 and struggled to see a real difference especially considering that they are three times the price.
The list of candidates is getting longer and I will have to set a day aside when i can compare them.

Cheers Stonesy.
Is there a RSPB shop at Carsington now? Dont remember that but miss Carsington though! For what its worth I have a Vortex 8x32 and can recommend it. My pick would be the Viper.
flossiepip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 15th January 2012, 18:06   #32
SEOW
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 141
On the Viper's FOV: the 8x42 does have a rather paltry 122m, but the 8x32 Stonesy66 was considering has abt. 133m- not stunningly expansive, but pretty good.

Last edited by SEOW : Sunday 15th January 2012 at 18:06. Reason: grammatical correction
SEOW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CA on low to mid price roofs? gweller Binoculars 20 Friday 18th April 2008 10:13
Best 7x42 (low/mid-price) solentbirder Binoculars 33 Saturday 9th September 2006 07:55
Best low-mid price 10x50 roofs ? solentbirder Binoculars 11 Wednesday 26th October 2005 16:58
Mid-price bins? Opinions please. smallblueplanet Binoculars 11 Sunday 11th April 2004 07:41
Mid price Binoculars. Tamir Binoculars 14 Tuesday 9th December 2003 11:34

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.17309999 seconds with 16 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46.