Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 9th January 2012, 18:58   #1
Tinbum
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 56
Nikon sportstar or hawke frontier?

While on a bike ride with the mrs today, we saw what we think was a ray swimming along near the shore. Later we cycled around swanpool and along swanvale, all packed with feathered critters. This has highlighted a need for pocket sized compact bins!
As luck would have it, it's my birthday tomorrow so we popped into our local camera shop to have a look. I tried several and narrowed it down to Nikon and Hawke 8x25 models retailing at £129 and £109. I've since found them for £50 less online, but am unsure which to go for.

Your advice please

Ooh, another thing... I assume 8x would be better than 10x for general wildlife watching. Am I barking up the wrong tree?



Last edited by Tinbum : Monday 9th January 2012 at 19:03.
Tinbum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 9th January 2012, 22:11   #2
typo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,413
I'm not sure I can be a lot of help.
The Hawke Frontier PC 8x25 got some favourable comments recently:
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=217398
I think an older model is still about and wasn't too impressed with that. Do you know which one it was?

I think the Nikon Sportstar has been discontinued. I've not tried it, but I'm pretty sure it's not phase coated, unlike the Hawke mentioned. In this style of binocular (roof prisms) polarisation occurs which causes something like 30% light loss and reduces contrast. Phase coating prevents this light loss. On paper at least, the Hawke should produce a brighter sharper view.

Although not quite as compact, in this price range, the Olympus PCI 8x25 (also called Tracker) receives a lot of positive reviews on the forum. It's not waterproof if that is an issue. This style of binocular (reverse porro) doesn't require phase coating.

Hope this helps a little.

David

PS. Forgot to comment on the magnification. I suggest you go for the 8x. It will give a brighter and steadier view.

Last edited by typo : Monday 9th January 2012 at 22:21.
typo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 10th January 2012, 06:27   #3
typo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,413
Happy Birthday!
typo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 10th January 2012, 18:21   #4
Tinbum
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by typo View Post
Happy Birthday!
Thank you very much
Tinbum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon Monarch 10X42 DCF (Mk III) OR Hawke Frontier ED 10x36 toadoftoadhall Binoculars 5 Monday 4th April 2011 22:53
Hawke Frontier v Frontier ED g0ukb Hawke Optics 6 Friday 11th February 2011 23:28
hawke frontier ed versus nikon monarch harold9649 Others 14 Tuesday 13th January 2009 09:49
Nikon Monarchs or Opticron Imagic se or Hawke frontier ed harold9649 Binoculars 4 Thursday 30th October 2008 21:54

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.15751696 seconds with 13 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:18.