Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 10th January 2012, 15:16   #1
YellowBudgie
Registered User
 
YellowBudgie's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 564
Taken with the Sigma 50-500mm

Just wanted to thank everyone who has helped me with advice on this forum. These are my first bird photos taken with the Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM.


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 004.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	364161  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 012.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	274.0 KB
ID:	364162  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 001.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	294.7 KB
ID:	364163  
__________________
YellowBudgie
YellowBudgie is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 11th January 2012, 13:07   #2
Musoman
PETE -Nikon birder
 
Musoman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,334
You first bird shots eh ? That 3rd one is hairier than any bird i've ever seen

Only kidding ya!

1st and 3rd shots look sharp enough at their downsized size. Did they look that sharp at their full original size ?

2nd shoot looks a little soft

I would up the exposure in post processing a bit on all three, plus a bit of saturation

There's no Exif data with your pix, so we dont know any of your settings.

When i used to own the 150-500 Sig OS model, sharpest pix were at f8
__________________
RSPB + Dogs Trust member
NIKON D300 + NIKON AF 70-210mm + Nikkor 20mm MF + Manfrotto / Giottos
BF Photos

Last edited by Musoman : Wednesday 11th January 2012 at 13:10.
Musoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 16:21   #3
YellowBudgie
Registered User
 
YellowBudgie's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musoman View Post
You first bird shots eh ? That 3rd one is hairier than any bird i've ever seen

Only kidding ya!

1st and 3rd shots look sharp enough at their downsized size. Did they look that sharp at their full original size ?

2nd shoot looks a little soft

I would up the exposure in post processing a bit on all three, plus a bit of saturation

There's no Exif data with your pix, so we dont know any of your settings.

When i used to own the 150-500 Sig OS model, sharpest pix were at f8
Hey Musoman,

They look pretty much the same as RAW files in lightroom as the exported versions. I had to add quite a bit of fill light (40) and noise reduction (58/50). I wonder if what I did in lightroom softened the photos up a little. I'll post them how they are pre-post processing except I'll crop them still.

Before I uploaded the files my exif data was intact. Strange.... Here's what I was shooting at:

File
Comment
Camera
Make Canon
Model Canon EOS 40D
X resolution 240/1
Y resolution 240/1
Resolution unit inches
Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom
Date/time 1/10/2012 11:12:39 AM
Image
Image description
Artist
Copyright
Exposure time 1/1000 s
F-number f/8
Exposure program Manual
ISO speed ratings ISO 800
Date/time original 1/9/2012 11:51:55 AM
Date/time digitized 1/9/2012 11:51:55 AM
Shutter speed value 1/1000 s
Aperture value f/8
Exposure bias value 0.00 eV
Max. aperture value f/6.2
Metering mode Pattern
Flash Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
Focal length 450 mm
User comment
Subsec time 0
Subsec time original 1
Subsec time digitized 1
Pixel X dimension 800
Pixel Y dimension 533
Focal plane X res. 3888000/876
Focal plane Y res. 2592000/583
Focal plane res. unit inch
Custom Rendered Normal process
Exposure mode Manual exposure
White balance Auto white balance
Scene capture type Standard
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 004.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	341.1 KB
ID:	364580  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 012.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	286.2 KB
ID:	364581  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 001.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	273.8 KB
ID:	364582  
__________________
YellowBudgie
YellowBudgie is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 16:33   #4
YellowBudgie
Registered User
 
YellowBudgie's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musoman View Post
You first bird shots eh ? That 3rd one is hairier than any bird i've ever seen

Only kidding ya!

1st and 3rd shots look sharp enough at their downsized size. Did they look that sharp at their full original size ?

2nd shoot looks a little soft

I would up the exposure in post processing a bit on all three, plus a bit of saturation

There's no Exif data with your pix, so we dont know any of your settings.

When i used to own the 150-500 Sig OS model, sharpest pix were at f8
I'll try increasing the exposure and add a little saturation and see how they come out.
__________________
YellowBudgie
YellowBudgie is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 17:00   #5
YellowBudgie
Registered User
 
YellowBudgie's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by YellowBudgie View Post
I'll try increasing the exposure and add a little saturation and see how they come out.
The increased saturation brought out the nice darkish reds in the birds, thanks for the tip! The photos look better with more exposure, it's too bad the noise comes out with the exposure as well. Time for a new DSLR, hehe. I think the new version of lightroom is supposed to have a new alogrithm for noise reduction.

Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 005.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	361.1 KB
ID:	364596  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 012.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	264.1 KB
ID:	364597  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 001.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	311.7 KB
ID:	364598  
__________________
YellowBudgie
YellowBudgie is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 19:01   #6
Musoman
PETE -Nikon birder
 
Musoman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,334
Processing can be a personal thing, so some people like it one way, some like it another etc etc,..but i like your last one's more that the others

I had a play too if you dont mind YB, and ran these through the Shadows & Light tool of CS4 mainly, with a tweak here and there of other tools, but not much to speak of.

I was trying to be relatively quick, and slightly over did the yellow bird, but didnt have time to correct it !
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 001.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	174.5 KB
ID:	364607  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 004.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	159.3 KB
ID:	364608  Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 012.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	139.3 KB
ID:	364609  
__________________
RSPB + Dogs Trust member
NIKON D300 + NIKON AF 70-210mm + Nikkor 20mm MF + Manfrotto / Giottos
BF Photos
Musoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 19:06   #7
Musoman
PETE -Nikon birder
 
Musoman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,334
This what i meant it to look like
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Birds - Wild Bird Crossing - 1-9-2012  - 004.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	159.9 KB
ID:	364614  
__________________
RSPB + Dogs Trust member
NIKON D300 + NIKON AF 70-210mm + Nikkor 20mm MF + Manfrotto / Giottos
BF Photos
Musoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 20:57   #8
YellowBudgie
Registered User
 
YellowBudgie's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musoman View Post
This what i meant it to look like
Thanks!

I like the black around the birds eye, it's much more solid than my version. I'll have to play around with lightroom 2.5 until I can get that nice and solid, there's a blacks setting in the main exposure settings, which brings out the other colors like the birds rufous coloring.

I have photoshop CS3 but haven't used it since lightroom came out. Man have I forgotten how CS3 works after years of lightroom.

Thanks again,

Dana
__________________
YellowBudgie
YellowBudgie is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 12th January 2012, 21:12   #9
Musoman
PETE -Nikon birder
 
Musoman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,334
I think i've probably used about 10% of what CS4 is capable of - its quite a deep program.

Anyways, as long as you are happy with your processing , thats all that counts
__________________
RSPB + Dogs Trust member
NIKON D300 + NIKON AF 70-210mm + Nikkor 20mm MF + Manfrotto / Giottos
BF Photos
Musoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 200-500mm vs. Sigma 50-500mm DG JSI Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 30 Monday 19th January 2009 08:07
Tamron 200-500mm vs. sigma 170-500mm shutterflyd50 Nikon 27 Thursday 15th January 2009 18:45
Sigma 135-400mm vs Sigma AF 170-500mm markyb2 Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 4 Saturday 15th March 2008 21:31
SIGMA 400mm F5.6 APO HSM or Sigma 170-500mm CurtMorgan Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 7 Saturday 4th November 2006 02:07

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.17178988 seconds with 19 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:52.